![]() |
One of a Kind.
https://scontent.fjan1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...RA&oe=67157797
I thought some of you might enjoy seeing this custom build from the 50's. |
My back is hurting just looking at it.
|
I use to have a bike exactly like that. But it was a different geometry. <grin>
|
DON'T show this to the UCI...
They may decide to incorporate some of this into new rules... :eek: Ride On Yuri |
I'm breaking my brain trying to figure out why someone would deliberatelly do that, and all I can come up with is they huffed spray paint cans....
|
I don't think my body bends like that....
|
No kidding, after one ride it was quickly decided that one such bike was enough.
|
'Sometimes the road less traveled is less traveled for a reason.' - Seinfeld
|
What group set are you running on there?
|
There was a guy in my town that had a bike similar to that and it was spray painted yellow. He rode it to work everyday.
|
needs more unused bottom brackets.
edit: How many clowns does it take to ride that thang? |
Looks like some kind of medieval torture device.
|
Originally Posted by RH Clark
(Post 23372495)
https://scontent.fjan1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...RA&oe=67157797
I thought some of you might enjoy seeing this custom build from the 50's. I also don't know how they could sit, have their legs that far up and forward, and still be able to pedal, and reach the handlebars without interference. This is a bike to put in front of a physics 1 class and say, "What is wrong with this picture? List every design aspect that is wrong." |
Originally Posted by Duragrouch
(Post 23374025)
Oh dear. Just on paper I could tell you that is extremely unstable, the tire contact patch is so far ahead of the steering axis, assuming I have the intended riding direction correct. Even a small offset like that has been proven to be unstable. That much might be too much for the rider to even control with both hands on the handlebars.
I also don't know how they could sit, have their legs that far up and forward, and still be able to pedal, and reach the handlebars without interference. This is a bike to put in front of a physics 1 class and say, "What is wrong with this picture? List every design aspect that is wrong." |
it's not from the 50s. It was built for a RatRodBikes.com build-off in 2008. It's called the Get Lucky. It was entries with ergos like this that prompted the rule that a riding video had to be entered with the final pictures for judging.
Gaskill made great bikes. He's an artist. Here's another entry for a different build off. It's called Josephine: https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...3d37890e23.png |
Originally Posted by RB1-luvr
(Post 23374150)
it's not from the 50s. It was built for a RatRodBikes.com build-off in 2008. It's called the Get Lucky. It was entries with ergos like this that prompted the rule that a riding video had to be entered with the final pictures for judging.
Gaskill made great bikes. He's an artist. Here's another entry for a different build off. It's called Josephine: https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...3d37890e23.png |
Horses for courses
|
My very first thought in seeing the pic was "I hope the shorts are double-padded."
Then I had another thought or two after looking at the whole bike... (which have been addressed nicely by others :) ) |
Originally Posted by wheelreason
(Post 23372786)
I'm breaking my brain trying to figure out why someone would deliberatelly do that, and all I can come up with is they huffed spray paint cans....
|
”The low rider, rides a little higher” which apparently he was during creation.
Psst: the fairing in on backwards creating additional drag, IF you can get the thing moving. |
I feel like the alt bike culture forum would really like this.
|
Originally Posted by rsbob
(Post 23374444)
”The low rider, rides a little higher” which apparently he was during creation.
Psst: the fairing in on backwards creating additional drag, IF you can get the thing moving. |
Originally Posted by RH Clark
(Post 23372495)
I thought some of you might enjoy seeing this custom build from the 50's.
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...04660476f6.jpg |
At least there will be one well illuminated front tire.
|
Originally Posted by Duragrouch
(Post 23374025)
Oh dear. Just on paper I could tell you that is extremely unstable, the tire contact patch is so far ahead of the steering axis, assuming I have the intended riding direction correct. Even a small offset like that has been proven to be unstable. That much might be too much for the rider to even control with both hands on the handlebars.
I also don't know how they could sit, have their legs that far up and forward, and still be able to pedal, and reach the handlebars without interference. This is a bike to put in front of a physics 1 class and say, "What is wrong with this picture? List every design aspect that is wrong." |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.