Qualifications of a bike route vs bike lane
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Qualifications of a bike route vs bike lane
I hope this doesn't sound like a silly question. I'm genuinely puzzled by what my city would have me interpret of the two.
We certainly have a few bike lanes, which I take are actually sections of a public road which have been designated specifically for bike travel. Those are easy to spot.
However, I'm puzzled by various signs (and maps) we have around for "bike routes" Generally there is a road with general traffic with no shoulder, and usually a sidewalk to the side. Am I to assume that a bike route is just a sidewalk for me to ride on next to a road? They vary in size from a typcal sidewalk width, to maybe a driveway's width. Or does the bike route intend for me to make use of the actual road-way?
We certainly have a few bike lanes, which I take are actually sections of a public road which have been designated specifically for bike travel. Those are easy to spot.
However, I'm puzzled by various signs (and maps) we have around for "bike routes" Generally there is a road with general traffic with no shoulder, and usually a sidewalk to the side. Am I to assume that a bike route is just a sidewalk for me to ride on next to a road? They vary in size from a typcal sidewalk width, to maybe a driveway's width. Or does the bike route intend for me to make use of the actual road-way?
#2
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
Originally Posted by Bud_311
I hope this doesn't sound like a silly question. I'm genuinely puzzled by what my city would have me interpret of the two.
We certainly have a few bike lanes, which I take are actually sections of a public road which have been designated specifically for bike travel. Those are easy to spot.
However, I'm puzzled by various signs (and maps) we have around for "bike routes" Generally there is a road with general traffic with no shoulder, and usually a sidewalk to the side. Am I to assume that a bike route is just a sidewalk for me to ride on next to a road? They vary in size from a typcal sidewalk width, to maybe a driveway's width. Or does the bike route intend for me to make use of the actual road-way?
We certainly have a few bike lanes, which I take are actually sections of a public road which have been designated specifically for bike travel. Those are easy to spot.
However, I'm puzzled by various signs (and maps) we have around for "bike routes" Generally there is a road with general traffic with no shoulder, and usually a sidewalk to the side. Am I to assume that a bike route is just a sidewalk for me to ride on next to a road? They vary in size from a typcal sidewalk width, to maybe a driveway's width. Or does the bike route intend for me to make use of the actual road-way?
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I believe denver defines bike routes as street routes with low traffic. Though I find this incorrect at times.
So, you ride on the streets with bike routes.
Bike lanes are generally seperate lanes of travel on busy streets. Again this is not entirely true.
The only time I ride on sidewalks is when directed to, albeit begrudgingly.
So, you ride on the streets with bike routes.
Bike lanes are generally seperate lanes of travel on busy streets. Again this is not entirely true.
The only time I ride on sidewalks is when directed to, albeit begrudgingly.
#4
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bike routes in California (and in most parts of the U.S., I believe) are pretty much the same thing that DataJunkie and wahoonc described in their states: they're the city or county's suggestions for good roads to ride on. Sometimes they're excellent suggestions, other times they're flat-out lousy...and no two riders will always agree on which ones are which. In any case, you're certainly never limited to riding on official "bike routes"; take them as a suggestion, but choose the roads that get you where you're going the most smoothly, safely, and enjoyably.
To address your question about riding on sidewalks -- that's almost never a good idea. Sidewalk riding may or may not be legal where you live, but it's almost always inefficient and unsafe (not just because you may be endangering pedestrians, but because cars which turn across your path at driveways and intersections won't be expecting to encounter a fast-moving cyclist on the sidewalk, and you and the driver often will lack a good line of sight to one another.)
By the way, the Advocacy and Safety subforum has a long thread on the question of sidewalk riding; you can find zillions of opinions there, links to relevant studies, and advice on those (rare) times when it really IS better to take the sidewalk.
Good luck, and enjoy your ride!
To address your question about riding on sidewalks -- that's almost never a good idea. Sidewalk riding may or may not be legal where you live, but it's almost always inefficient and unsafe (not just because you may be endangering pedestrians, but because cars which turn across your path at driveways and intersections won't be expecting to encounter a fast-moving cyclist on the sidewalk, and you and the driver often will lack a good line of sight to one another.)
By the way, the Advocacy and Safety subforum has a long thread on the question of sidewalk riding; you can find zillions of opinions there, links to relevant studies, and advice on those (rare) times when it really IS better to take the sidewalk.
Good luck, and enjoy your ride!