Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Qualifications of a bike route vs bike lane

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Qualifications of a bike route vs bike lane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-06, 04:34 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Qualifications of a bike route vs bike lane

I hope this doesn't sound like a silly question. I'm genuinely puzzled by what my city would have me interpret of the two.

We certainly have a few bike lanes, which I take are actually sections of a public road which have been designated specifically for bike travel. Those are easy to spot.

However, I'm puzzled by various signs (and maps) we have around for "bike routes" Generally there is a road with general traffic with no shoulder, and usually a sidewalk to the side. Am I to assume that a bike route is just a sidewalk for me to ride on next to a road? They vary in size from a typcal sidewalk width, to maybe a driveway's width. Or does the bike route intend for me to make use of the actual road-way?
Bud_311 is offline  
Old 09-12-06, 04:45 AM
  #2  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Bud_311
I hope this doesn't sound like a silly question. I'm genuinely puzzled by what my city would have me interpret of the two.

We certainly have a few bike lanes, which I take are actually sections of a public road which have been designated specifically for bike travel. Those are easy to spot.

However, I'm puzzled by various signs (and maps) we have around for "bike routes" Generally there is a road with general traffic with no shoulder, and usually a sidewalk to the side. Am I to assume that a bike route is just a sidewalk for me to ride on next to a road? They vary in size from a typcal sidewalk width, to maybe a driveway's width. Or does the bike route intend for me to make use of the actual road-way?
It may depend on the area. Where I live in NC, Bike Routes are signed routes where you ride on the street, for the most part. Unfortunately they aren't always up to date. There is one bike route that I helped install signs for over 30 years ago, the signs are still there and the road has gone from a fairly quiet 4 lane residential street to a 6 lane raceway. It isn't uncommon for vehicles to be exceeding the speed limit by 20mph or more

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 09-12-06, 09:20 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I believe denver defines bike routes as street routes with low traffic. Though I find this incorrect at times.
So, you ride on the streets with bike routes.
Bike lanes are generally seperate lanes of travel on busy streets. Again this is not entirely true.

The only time I ride on sidewalks is when directed to, albeit begrudgingly.
DataJunkie is offline  
Old 09-12-06, 11:19 AM
  #4  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bike routes in California (and in most parts of the U.S., I believe) are pretty much the same thing that DataJunkie and wahoonc described in their states: they're the city or county's suggestions for good roads to ride on. Sometimes they're excellent suggestions, other times they're flat-out lousy...and no two riders will always agree on which ones are which. In any case, you're certainly never limited to riding on official "bike routes"; take them as a suggestion, but choose the roads that get you where you're going the most smoothly, safely, and enjoyably.

To address your question about riding on sidewalks -- that's almost never a good idea. Sidewalk riding may or may not be legal where you live, but it's almost always inefficient and unsafe (not just because you may be endangering pedestrians, but because cars which turn across your path at driveways and intersections won't be expecting to encounter a fast-moving cyclist on the sidewalk, and you and the driver often will lack a good line of sight to one another.)

By the way, the Advocacy and Safety subforum has a long thread on the question of sidewalk riding; you can find zillions of opinions there, links to relevant studies, and advice on those (rare) times when it really IS better to take the sidewalk.

Good luck, and enjoy your ride!
Paul Graham is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.