Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Best Quality Bikes?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Best Quality Bikes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-07 | 11:12 PM
  #26  
Machka's Avatar
In Real Life
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 52,159
Likes: 772
From: Down under down under

Bikes: Lots

Originally Posted by Barabaika
I wonder how it is possible.
For example, there are two bike companies that have $300 bikes.
How can one company use good components and another bad if they both buy them from Shimano? I understand if the second company uses noname components that can fail.
If both bicycle choices are $300, there probably isn't much difference in components between the two.

But if one bicycle is $300 and the other bicycle is $3000, you can bet there will be a big difference!
Machka is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-07 | 12:06 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 890
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Machka
But if one bicycle is $300 and the other bicycle is $3000, you can bet there will be a big difference!
Probably, the difference won't be as significant as in the case of a Toyota car, which the author of the topic says to be of the highest quality, for $30000 and a new car for $3000.

A bike for $3000 will have no built-in DVD player, no auto transmission, no fan, no gold chain.

Last edited by Barabaika; 01-09-07 at 12:12 AM.
Barabaika is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-07 | 05:26 AM
  #28  
mike's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,391
Likes: 2
From: Snowy midwest
Originally Posted by DieselDan
If you want to spend $300 on a new bike, why not spend that money on a better rear wheel? The rest of the bike is in good order, and the rear axle broke. Broken rear axles were commonplace before the advent of freehubs and cassettes, which widen the bearing support. You have a freewheel now, which is screwed onto the rear hub. The axle broke from hard riding or a manufacturing defect. The LBS should replace it under warrenty.
Like so many things, the sum cost of the parts exceeds the price of a whole new unit. In the case of a new higher quality wheel, what would you expect to pay? I am thinking it might be around $150 for a good quality rear wheel. That is already half the price of the $300 budget for a new mountain bike.

It is ironic, to be sure.
mike is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-07 | 12:59 PM
  #29  
GaryA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Canby, Oregon

Bikes: Gary Fischer mtb, Specialized Allez, Cannondale Jekyl, Trek 8700, Motobecane Sprint (just ordered)

I agree with its the components not the bike. Unless you are breaking frames the bike has nothing to do with it. The cheaper the bike the cheaper the components. I have been riding the same Trek since 1991 and have used and abused it with all weather/any weather riding, cyclecross, and mtb racing. I have only had to true the front wheel once when not clearing a ditch. Other then that regular maintenance has kept it bullet proof.
GaryA is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-07 | 02:53 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 779
Likes: 1
From: Portland, Maine USA

Bikes: Trek 850 Antelope

I will NEVER, EVER buy a bicycle from a big-box, con-man, or on e-bay.

DOWN WITH WAL-MART!!
powerhouse is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-07 | 03:27 PM
  #31  
Dr.Deltron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by powerhouse
I will NEVER, EVER buy a bicycle from... e-bay.
Afraid of getting a good deal?
 
Reply
Old 01-10-07 | 01:25 AM
  #32  
supercub's Avatar
Baka dakara
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Everyone keeps trashing Alivio components. My bike has Alivio Seems to work fine. The gears shift smoothly and quickly.

I really don't get this component elitist thing. Frames I get. My bike is kind of heavy, and I really feel the bumps and jolts. I'd go for

I'm sure nicer components are more responsive, but is it really so significant? Are they more reliable?
supercub is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-07 | 03:34 AM
  #33  
womble's Avatar
No longer in Wimbledon...
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Originally Posted by supercub
I'm sure nicer components are more responsive, but is it really so significant? Are they more reliable?
Yes, yes they are.

I changed a worn XT front mech for a Deore. Same cables. The Deore was noticeably slower. I've done a similar comparison with X.7 and XT derailleurs.

And the front mech is dead simple. I assume that the difference would be even more pronounced with the more complicated rear.

No significant difference with non-mechanical or non-stressed parts like seatposts and handlebars though, unless you call minor weight reductions "responsive".
womble is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-07 | 02:11 PM
  #34  
rmikkelsen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Plaistow, NH

Bikes: '78 Chris Kvale, '87 Paramount

Also, not sure why you'd want a hybrid for the road, when you've got a mountain bike. Get a road bike, leave it in the shed with the mountain bike, and see what comes out in the spring!
rmikkelsen is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.