Best Quality Bikes?
#26
Originally Posted by Barabaika
I wonder how it is possible.
For example, there are two bike companies that have $300 bikes.
How can one company use good components and another bad if they both buy them from Shimano? I understand if the second company uses noname components that can fail.
For example, there are two bike companies that have $300 bikes.
How can one company use good components and another bad if they both buy them from Shimano? I understand if the second company uses noname components that can fail.
But if one bicycle is $300 and the other bicycle is $3000, you can bet there will be a big difference!
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#27
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 890
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Machka
But if one bicycle is $300 and the other bicycle is $3000, you can bet there will be a big difference!
A bike for $3000 will have no built-in DVD player, no auto transmission, no fan, no gold chain.
Last edited by Barabaika; 01-09-07 at 12:12 AM.
#28
Originally Posted by DieselDan
If you want to spend $300 on a new bike, why not spend that money on a better rear wheel? The rest of the bike is in good order, and the rear axle broke. Broken rear axles were commonplace before the advent of freehubs and cassettes, which widen the bearing support. You have a freewheel now, which is screwed onto the rear hub. The axle broke from hard riding or a manufacturing defect. The LBS should replace it under warrenty.
It is ironic, to be sure.
#29
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Canby, Oregon
Bikes: Gary Fischer mtb, Specialized Allez, Cannondale Jekyl, Trek 8700, Motobecane Sprint (just ordered)
I agree with its the components not the bike. Unless you are breaking frames the bike has nothing to do with it. The cheaper the bike the cheaper the components. I have been riding the same Trek since 1991 and have used and abused it with all weather/any weather riding, cyclecross, and mtb racing. I have only had to true the front wheel once when not clearing a ditch. Other then that regular maintenance has kept it bullet proof.
#32
Everyone keeps trashing Alivio components. My bike has Alivio
Seems to work fine. The gears shift smoothly and quickly.
I really don't get this component elitist thing. Frames I get. My bike is kind of heavy, and I really feel the bumps and jolts. I'd go for
I'm sure nicer components are more responsive, but is it really so significant? Are they more reliable?
Seems to work fine. The gears shift smoothly and quickly. I really don't get this component elitist thing. Frames I get. My bike is kind of heavy, and I really feel the bumps and jolts. I'd go for
I'm sure nicer components are more responsive, but is it really so significant? Are they more reliable?
#33
Originally Posted by supercub
I'm sure nicer components are more responsive, but is it really so significant? Are they more reliable?
I changed a worn XT front mech for a Deore. Same cables. The Deore was noticeably slower. I've done a similar comparison with X.7 and XT derailleurs.
And the front mech is dead simple. I assume that the difference would be even more pronounced with the more complicated rear.
No significant difference with non-mechanical or non-stressed parts like seatposts and handlebars though, unless you call minor weight reductions "responsive".
#34
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Plaistow, NH
Bikes: '78 Chris Kvale, '87 Paramount
Also, not sure why you'd want a hybrid for the road, when you've got a mountain bike. Get a road bike, leave it in the shed with the mountain bike, and see what comes out in the spring!







