Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

"Bootless" Shocks?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

"Bootless" Shocks?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-03 | 07:46 PM
  #1  
CeleronXL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: United States Of America
"Bootless" Shocks?

Is there an advantage to "bootless" shocks? I'm not sure if that's the correct term for them, but I'm referring to shocks that don't have a rubber "boot" type thing over the shock. It seems like mostly the higher end shocks are "bootless" - is there an advantage to this?

EDIT:
Boot:


VS
Bootless:

Last edited by CeleronXL; 07-10-03 at 07:58 PM.
CeleronXL is offline  
Reply
Old 07-10-03 | 08:20 PM
  #2  
Dirtgrinder's Avatar
Dances with Rocks
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
From: Jefferson City, MO
The "bootless" shocks supposedly have better seals to keep the dust/dirt out. I've found that the ones I've had with boots just seem to keep the crud inside better though. I cut them off or take them off when I service them.
__________________
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough...

To become a registered member of BikeForums Click Here
Dirtgrinder is offline  
Reply
Old 07-10-03 | 08:25 PM
  #3  
Dutchy's Avatar
We drive on the left.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Just another marketing gimmick.

CHEERS.

Mark
Dutchy is offline  
Reply
Old 07-10-03 | 08:31 PM
  #4  
CeleronXL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: United States Of America
Originally posted by Dirtgrinder
The "bootless" shocks supposedly have better seals to keep the dust/dirt out. I've found that the ones I've had with boots just seem to keep the crud inside better though. I cut them off or take them off when I service them.
You can cut them off? What would you use to do so? Can you get it all off?
CeleronXL is offline  
Reply
Old 07-10-03 | 08:39 PM
  #5  
Dirtgrinder's Avatar
Dances with Rocks
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
From: Jefferson City, MO
Just start at one end with a knife and cut to the other end. They'll come right off. You could probably even use scissors.
__________________
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough...

To become a registered member of BikeForums Click Here
Dirtgrinder is offline  
Reply
Old 07-10-03 | 08:48 PM
  #6  
CeleronXL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: United States Of America
So just slice top to bottom, or around it?

(I just want to make sure I'm doing it 100% correctly before I go slicing things off my bike)
CeleronXL is offline  
Reply
Old 07-10-03 | 08:54 PM
  #7  
Dirtgrinder's Avatar
Dances with Rocks
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
From: Jefferson City, MO
Yep. Top to bottom or bottom to top. You can probably start in the middle and work your way towards the end. Then when you get close to the end you can just pull it apart the last little bit. Just be careful not to scratch the stancheon tube underneath. There's plenty of room to work though.
__________________
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough...

To become a registered member of BikeForums Click Here
Dirtgrinder is offline  
Reply
Old 07-10-03 | 09:19 PM
  #8  
CeleronXL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: United States Of America
Originally posted by Dirtgrinder
Yep. Top to bottom or bottom to top. You can probably start in the middle and work your way towards the end. Then when you get close to the end you can just pull it apart the last little bit. Just be careful not to scratch the stancheon tube underneath. There's plenty of room to work though.
Cool, thanks, I think I'll do that.
CeleronXL is offline  
Reply
Old 07-11-03 | 12:27 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,924
Likes: 589
From: San Jose, CA

Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride

looks cooler huh? =]
tFUnK is offline  
Reply
Old 07-11-03 | 04:29 AM
  #10  
mightypudge's Avatar
Victim of Circumstance
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
Originally posted by tFUnK
looks cooler huh? =]
And more expensive. :thumbup:
mightypudge is offline  
Reply
Old 07-11-03 | 06:04 AM
  #11  
I ride a REAL Schwinn!
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: NH, USA

Bikes: Lemond Nevada City (stock), '00 Schwinn Moab 3 (very upgraded)

Just to reiterate what Dirtgrinder said - You definitely don't want to be scratching the stanchion tube (the part of the fork covered by the boot) while slicing them the fork boots off.

-Moab
moabrider47 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.