PI Quest vs. Attack vs. Ultrasensor
08-19-03 | 01:06 AM
#1
Thread Starter
I descend on my face
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: The Land of Milk and Hoppy.
PI Quest vs. Attack vs. Ultrasensor
So I stopped by REI today and picked up a pair of Quests and a pair of Attacks.
I liked the padding in the Quests, but they chafed like a mofo.
The Attacks didn't have the shafing problem, but the padding didn't feel quite as thick.
I'm thinking of trying out the Ultrasensors next...how do they compare to the Attacks? Is the chamois any different?
I liked the padding in the Quests, but they chafed like a mofo.
The Attacks didn't have the shafing problem, but the padding didn't feel quite as thick.
I'm thinking of trying out the Ultrasensors next...how do they compare to the Attacks? Is the chamois any different?
08-19-03 | 01:21 AM
#2
DEADBEEF
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,234
Likes: 10
From: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
The UltraSensors have much higher quality padding than the Attacks. Additionally, the UltraSensors are 8-panel vs the Attack's 6-panels (I have older Attacks) although I think the newer Attacks are 8-panel too. The lycra of the UltraSensors also feel nicer to me. The Quests look to be what the older Attacks were and are only 6-panel.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM
2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM
2001 Aegis Aro Svelte"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
08-23-03 | 09:05 PM
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 102
Likes: 2
From: Texas
I like the Ultrasensor's for their fit and feel, but I really think that Performance's Elite actually cushions the tush more. I rode back to back 70 mile plus days using both and found that they Elites were more comfortable. Plus the fact they are much less in cost makes them extremely attractive.
