![]() |
Originally Posted by rustguard
(Post 7130912)
well forgive me I didnt get the idea that the argument through this post was whether clipless were better for a ride around the pond.
|
Originally Posted by cooker
(Post 7130945)
Well, this is the general cycling discussion forum, not road racing.
It's not all about cruisers, sprung saddles and platforms for those of us that do not race. |
Originally Posted by rogerstg
(Post 7131159)
It's not "recreation and family" either. Lots of riders don't race but still strive for a workout on their rides.
If I can spin my heavy rivendell fast enough in a 50/17 gear combo to do up near 30mph, you shouldn't have any problems on a lighter, faster, stripped down bike. Clipless are about obtaining that last 10th of performance... that edge you need to win when every millisecond counts. You don't *need* them to get the same workout. I like them on my road bike because they make me feel more connected and part of the sleek, precise machine between my legs (wow that sounded.... not so good), and on my commuter I like studded platforms for a multitude of reasons. But I can get the same workout on either bike. |
Originally Posted by rustguard
(Post 7130825)
WOWHow could anyone question the superiority of clipless shoes?
|
Originally Posted by Grumpy Pig
(Post 7099633)
These kind of look like regular shoes. I wear them on my commuter. They come in grey or brown. http://www.performancebike.com/shop/...tegory_ID=2120
http://www.performancebike.com/shop/...e.cfm?SKU=2275 Some people would find it annoying to flip the pedal around, but I think it works great for transitioning from a no-traffic area to traffic. And I can wear those shoes anywhere. |
Interesting discovering this discussion this afternoon. I just recently started riding again after a many year lapse. I had been using a cheapo mtb to putter around on, but now that I've gotten a larger, more comfortable bike that actually works, the longer I've been riding it, the more I've been missing my toe clips (that and my drops). I can't say I know _how_ the clips work, but I know that I ride smoother, and my confidence at higher rpms goes way up. This is the first bike I've seriously ridden that had platform pedals, and even after a bunch of years, I feel the difference, and miss being tied in.
I think that one genuine factor of being attached to the pedals is that simple fact of confidence. You can push harder when you need it, you can power up faster, and really push on the hills. I'm not so convinced that the upstroke issue is a big issue. From my experience (consciously "pulling") I've never been convinced that there is much in that. However, I am convinced the extra rotation at both the bottom and the top of the stroke _do_ make a difference in my pedaling experience. With platforms, you aren't even getting a full half-turn of genuine power. It's more like 1/4 of a pedal stroke, if not less. Once your foot starts rounding out at the bottom, your power is way much lower than on the top 1/4 of the turn. In evidence, yesterday or Saturday, I was watching the tour, and watching how the bikes would "spurt" forward when the riders were sitting, and giving power strokes. That spurt is during that real power stroke--even with clipless pedals, they aren't getting the same power for the entire downstroke, but during only a small part of it. I am convinced, however, that when your feet are attached to the pedals, you are getting a longer useful stroke than with platforms. I would love to see genuine data from this stuff. It would most certainly get rid of some of the argument over this issue. ;-) Lastly, for me, while clipless sound delightful (no scratches on your shoes from the clips, or squeezed feet from the straps, nor having to pause to clamp down the straps, or loosen them, and no trying to flip the pedals to get your feet in (actually, I was really good at just stepping right in without thinking about it, so that isn't such a big deal, IMO--once you learn, it's second nature). However, how easy is it to flip the clipless pedal and clip in? I bet it's no easier than planting your foot into the clips (you just don't have the strap to tighten). and who wants to change shoes when he gets to work? ;-) (I'm speaking for myself only) Still.... gotta find me some of those Power Grips. :-) -Jon |
Originally Posted by joninkrakow
(Post 7151850)
However, I am convinced the extra rotation at both the bottom and the top of the stroke _do_ make a difference in my pedaling experience. With platforms, you aren't even getting a full half-turn of genuine power. It's more like 1/4 of a pedal stroke, if not less.
Originally Posted by joninkrakow
(Post 7151850)
I would love to see genuine data from this stuff. It would most certainly get rid of some of the argument over this issue. ;-) .
http://www.wholeathlete.com/document...artt_09-06.pdf |
Originally Posted by cooker
(Post 7152201)
There is data. Here's an excellent summary of studies of pedalling efficiency from sports medicine experts like Coyle or Broker. If you look at Coyle's data (figure 1) you'll see that elite racers apply zero torque for a full 180 degrees of the pedal cycle.All the power is applied on the downstroke. All they do on the upstroke is unweight the pedal - they don't "pull up" - and the power applied through the top and bottom of the stroke (ie. right at 360/0 and 180) is minimal.
http://www.wholeathlete.com/document...artt_09-06.pdf If there's a way to measure the actual tugging & mashing that a shoe cleat sees, I'll be glad to be a test rider. Wire me up for my commute, too. I just hope that I don't pull the cleats out of my shoes. |
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
(Post 7152269)
How was it measured? Did they use strain gauges in the pedals?
3. Coyle EF, Feltner ME, Kautz SA, Hamilton MT, Montain SJ, Baylor AM, Abraham LD, and Petrek GW. Physiological and biomechanical factors associated with elite endurance cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Jan; 23(1):93-107, 1991.
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
(Post 7152269)
Can they explain why I sometimes hop my rear wheel? .
|
Originally Posted by joninkrakow
(Post 7151850)
Lastly, for me, while clipless sound delightful (no scratches on your shoes from the clips, or squeezed feet from the straps, nor having to pause to clamp down the straps, or loosen them, and no trying to flip the pedals to get your feet in (actually, I was really good at just stepping right in without thinking about it, so that isn't such a big deal, IMO--once you learn, it's second nature). However, how easy is it to flip the clipless pedal and clip in? I bet it's no easier than planting your foot into the clips (you just don't have the strap to tighten). and who wants to change shoes when he gets to work? ;-) (I'm speaking for myself only)
I'm actually going to go buy another bike today, and I'll probably just ride it home with some plain platforms from the shop. I'll try not to throw my feet off the pedals on the way back. :D |
Originally Posted by cooker
(Post 7152339)
Here's the citation - when I get a chance I'll log onto the University server and see if it's available online.
Obviously you're not an elite racer :) |
I'm addicted--if my present bike suddenly turned into the one I had in 1970, it'd be just fine--as long as my Shimano SPD's were still on it! There are valid reasons to not use clipless, and there are plenty of good pedals, clips, and straps available--thank your local trendy fixie riders for that--but it can be really hard to find shoes that are comfortable to ride in with them. I have heard that cheap soccer or baseball shoes with cleats strategically ground off can work--seriously.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.