Computer question?
#1
Thread Starter
Tony V
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
Bikes: Apollo Mountain bike
Computer question?
If you get two identical computers and put them on two identical bikes with identical settings can you still get a variation in the reading?
P.S. Happy New Year to all.
P.S. Happy New Year to all.
#2
Galveston County Texas
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 33,335
Likes: 1,285
From: In The Wind
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
#3
Really Old Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,583
Likes: 1,841
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3
And do you ride exactly in the same place. Some people veer more side to side on their "straight path".
I've also noticed that a change from 60 to 70 PSI on my 26x1.50" tire makes nearly a 4% difference. Maybe that's telling me something, since it's 65 MAX?
Forgot to add-
Computers are basically just a clock that runs and counts pulses vs time. The clocks probably vary somewhat. Temperature MIGHT have a major effect, if it's a cheap timer. That shouldn't affect distance traveled, but could alter the indicated speed.
I've also noticed that a change from 60 to 70 PSI on my 26x1.50" tire makes nearly a 4% difference. Maybe that's telling me something, since it's 65 MAX?

Forgot to add-
Computers are basically just a clock that runs and counts pulses vs time. The clocks probably vary somewhat. Temperature MIGHT have a major effect, if it's a cheap timer. That shouldn't affect distance traveled, but could alter the indicated speed.
Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 12-31-08 at 02:21 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Delaware, OH
Bikes: Giant OCR2, Puegeot Altitude 21 MTB
Mostly related to weight, air pressure in the tires, and ambient temperature.
I have noticed that computers with the sensor on the rear wheel are more prone to inacuracies then front wheel ones, mainly due to higher percentage of the rider's weight being on the rear tire.
I have noticed that computers with the sensor on the rear wheel are more prone to inacuracies then front wheel ones, mainly due to higher percentage of the rider's weight being on the rear tire.
#5
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,521
Likes: 2
From: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger
Another X factor is interference. Even with a wired computer, you can get erratic readings around high voltage transmission wires.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: S.F. Bay Area
Bikes: Scott CR1 SL, Giant TCR-C0, Fisher Sugar, old Cannondale, Lemond Tourmalet
Don't forget to factor in the ammount of time you spend seated vs standing on each bike.
Mt bikes ridden offroad might see slight tire slip in some conditions.
Mt bikes ridden offroad might see slight tire slip in some conditions.
#7
All measuring instruments have some tollerance limits. We're not talking about National Standards Lab accuracies here.
#8
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Bikes: litespeed, cannondale
I rather doubt that anyone on these forums or anywhere else has taken 2 identical computers and identical bikes and tried to compare measurements. I think my experience is as close as you are going to get. You can even try it yourself. Do an out and back ride. Check the reading at the halfway point and record it. Then take a reading at the end.
#9
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 15
From: Columbus, Ohio
Bikes: Rivendell A.Homer Hilsen, Paramount P13, (4) Falcon bicycles, Mondia Special, Rodriguez Tandem
You can get your computer to a pretty high degree of accuracy, more accurate than your car, if you use the roll out method to measure your tire's circumference. Your distance traveled will be within 1% of a ride companion who has also calibrated his bike/computer using the rollout method.





