Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Frame Size vs Height

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Frame Size vs Height

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-04 | 06:00 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Frame Size vs Height

If I'm close to 6' tall, will a 54cm frame be too small or manageable?
g3ck0 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-16-04 | 07:07 PM
  #2  
Zin's Avatar
Zin
On your what?!?
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,317
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, CO
I would have to say that a traditional geometry 54cm will be WAY to small for you. I am ~5'11" and ride a 56cm with a fairly long stem. Keep in mind that this is a very general statement since there is much more to bike fit than your height. For instance, I have a long torso and quite short legs. (32" cycling inseam) So, depending on your build, you may even need to go to a 57 or 58cm depending on the manufacturer. Your best bet is to go to a local bike shop (LBS) and get a proper fitting done.

Good luck!
Bob
__________________
---
Former 340# Type 2 Diabetic.
My web site.
Proud member of Colorado's Best Cycling Club - Club Hypoxia
Zin is offline  
Reply
Old 08-16-04 | 09:37 PM
  #3  
CheesyD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Maine

Bikes: 2004 Specialized Expedition Sport

Here's a "fit calculator" that someone else posted...

https://www.competitivecyclist.com/za...sex=M&units=cm
CheesyD is offline  
Reply
Old 08-16-04 | 09:40 PM
  #4  
Zin's Avatar
Zin
On your what?!?
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,317
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, CO
Sweet! Thanks for posting that, CheesyD!
__________________
---
Former 340# Type 2 Diabetic.
My web site.
Proud member of Colorado's Best Cycling Club - Club Hypoxia
Zin is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-04 | 06:17 AM
  #5  
khackney's Avatar
Bicycle Luge Racer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: East Tennessee

Bikes: Modern, old, fixed, mountain.

Originally Posted by g3ck0
If I'm close to 6' tall, will a 54cm frame be too small or manageable?
If you have average proportions you will probably end up at about 58cm for most brands. A race setup might put you on a 56 but no smaller. To ride a 54 you will need a mountain seat post and a pretty long stem. Also, the crank arms on a 54 might be a little short for your liking. A lot of compromising to ride a frame that doesn't fit.
khackney is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-04 | 09:52 AM
  #6  
Retro Grouch's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 30,225
Likes: 649
From: St Peters, Missouri

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Pants come in waist sizes and leg lengths. You have to get them both right or they won't fit.

Bicycles come in seat tube and top tube lengths. Not only do you have to get them both right but all the bike manufacturers don't even measure them the same.

Bike riders come in different porportions of torso's vs. leg lengths. Consequently, two riders who are exactly the same height might have different bike sizing needs.

I wouldn't put too much reliance on advice given by someone who has never seen me and whose background and experience are unknown to me.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-04 | 12:40 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,169
Likes: 1,797
From: Madison, WI USA
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
Pants come in waist sizes and leg lengths. You have to get them both right or they won't fit.

Bicycles come in seat tube and top tube lengths. Not only do you have to get them both right but all the bike manufacturers don't even measure them the same.
Problem is, one "model" of pants comes in a "grid" of waist sizes and leg lengths. Typically, one model of bike comes in a "linear" selection of frame sizes, with the seat tube and top tube lengths increasing proportionally. To get the right seat tube / top tube combination, you either have to shop among different models (potentially compromising on quality, componentry or features) or go custom-made. So yeah, it's a lot more complicated than simply going by overall height. It's even more than just upper-body vs. leg length. Ratio of upper-leg and lower-leg length determines crank length, seat height, fore/aft seat position, stem length, stem height, etc.
madpogue is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-04 | 01:54 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: NC
I just sold a 56cm semi compact goemetry frame that was a hair too tall for me but I liked the length so now I am on a 54cm with a 120mm stem and it is just right . I am 5-9 with a 31 inseam. I you are 6 ft it is way too small for you . You would probably need a stem that is not avilalable, I may be wrong but I think they only go to 130mm.
roadpig2001 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.