Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Is there a structural difference in feel or function for men/women's frame geometry?

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Is there a structural difference in feel or function for men/women's frame geometry?

Old 11-06-11, 10:48 PM
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is there a structural difference in feel or function for men/women's frame geometry?

Old-fashioned women's style bikes have the top tube running parallel or downwards next to the downtube.

I've wondered, how does this affect the riding/function? I imagine it's less strong, being not a triangle, but that is rarely a real concern. Is there more vibration in the front because it's connected on a narrower set of tubes?

I'm sure there's a difference in feel or function, because otherwise it'd seem that a sloping top tube would make more sense for all bikes practically, because then anybody could use almost any bike and not worry about standover height.

(My inseam is ~ 28 which is why I'm so concerned with bike sizes)

Last edited by CyJackX; 11-06-11 at 11:16 PM.
CyJackX is offline  
Old 11-06-11, 11:43 PM
Jeff Wills
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Jeff Wills's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,473
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 275 Times in 179 Posts
Difference in function: it allows you to ride in a skirt or kilt.

Difference in feel: minimal. The vast majority of these bikes were built with heavier-gauge tubing, so any difference in "feel" would be masked by the different tubing gauge. Besides, any differences in frame design or tubing is much smaller than the differences made by changing tire pressure.
Jeff Wills

Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills is offline  
Old 11-06-11, 11:53 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,309
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I think the women's frames that you are describing may be weaker because the forward triangle left is open due to the lowered top tube. This can place additional stress on the seat tube and stronger tubes may be required possibly making the bike heavier. This could mean the frame won't last as long due to the stress.

The double triangle/ diamond frame is tried and true which is why it is the defacto standard for most bikes and even some women's models. If you look at some mid-range or high end women's bikes like Trek 7.5FX WSD, they still retain the double triangle frame but come in small frame sizes like 13 and 15 with stand over heights as low as 26inches which might work out for you.

Another option is a mixte frame which is similar to the women's frames you are describing but uses two smaller diameter tubes that run straight back to the rear wheel. These are sort of a niche market though, so any new bike you find with this type of frame might be out of your budget.
jsdavis is offline  
Related Topics
Thread Starter
Last Post
Classic & Vintage
04-11-19 03:52 PM
General Cycling Discussion
08-31-16 08:45 AM
Road Cycling
11-23-14 09:25 AM
Carson Dyle
General Cycling Discussion
06-29-13 07:48 AM
07-05-11 09:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.