Thoughts on this video - why do high-end bikes cost so much?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 2,886
Bikes: Catrike 700, Greenspeed GTO trike, , Linear LWB recumbent, Haluzak Horizon SWB recumbent, Balance 450 MTB, Cannondale SM800 Beast of the East
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 523 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 229 Times
in
181 Posts
Just for kicks I went on our local CL and looked just at bikes listed for $1k or more. There are a couple pages of them. Ditto for bikes listed at >$2K. It appears that a fair number of people buy expensive bikes and then decide they may have made a mistake after a year or so. If I were going to buy a really expensive road or MTB I would want it to be fitted to me. Buying second hand is nice but it is a lot harder to get one that fits.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Just for kicks I went on our local CL and looked just at bikes listed for $1k or more. There are a couple pages of them. Ditto for bikes listed at >$2K. It appears that a fair number of people buy expensive bikes and then decide they may have made a mistake after a year or so. If I were going to buy a really expensive road or MTB I would want it to be fitted to me. Buying second hand is nice but it is a lot harder to get one that fits.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 2,886
Bikes: Catrike 700, Greenspeed GTO trike, , Linear LWB recumbent, Haluzak Horizon SWB recumbent, Balance 450 MTB, Cannondale SM800 Beast of the East
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 523 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 229 Times
in
181 Posts
I'm on the very short side of the spectrum. I picked just one bike at random on bikepedia - the 2014 Cannondale CAAD10 3 Ultegra Double with MSRP $2270. It comes in the following frame sizes 48cm , 50cm , 52cm , 54cm , 56cm , 58cm , 60cm , 63cm Many people who list their bikes on CL don't even list a frame size. It is a crap shoot to find one that really is best for your particular size.
#30
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
I did watch the whole video, and pretty much agree with the guy. I have posted on several bike forums about the cost of bikes.
Where I do depart from what he was saying is on clothes and accessories. I ride a recumbent bike and trike. I do not need clothes that protect me from my bents, since they do not tend to hurt me. I make do with $15 rugby shorts, and common wicking t-shirts.
The bottom line here, and what the guy on the video was mousing around is-------------if you want to be a egotistical peacock that says look at how much I spent, be my guest. But--------if you want to use common sense and logic, search out equiptment that gives the most bang for the buck. Ask your self-------am I riding a serviceable bike or a name brand. Just who am I trying to impress????
Where I do depart from what he was saying is on clothes and accessories. I ride a recumbent bike and trike. I do not need clothes that protect me from my bents, since they do not tend to hurt me. I make do with $15 rugby shorts, and common wicking t-shirts.
The bottom line here, and what the guy on the video was mousing around is-------------if you want to be a egotistical peacock that says look at how much I spent, be my guest. But--------if you want to use common sense and logic, search out equiptment that gives the most bang for the buck. Ask your self-------am I riding a serviceable bike or a name brand. Just who am I trying to impress????
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The thing I did not understand why the narrator comparing a TT bike to a road bike. 99.99999999% of recreational cyclists would not go out and buy a TT bike. I don't even think a LBS would even have the conscience to suggest a TT bike to a recreational user even if Bill Gates was the buyer. So the comparison between the two is like what he said, "apples and oranges" so the purpose of the narrator's intention of comparing the two is strange. The comparison between a motorcycle and road bike was also strange and has no meaning. I won't go into that.
Also the fact having a carbon bike versus a steel bike is the smoothness on the road. That's the main difference. Third, his bad experience with DA and ultegra components doesn't represents the quality of its product as a whole. Every brand on this planet will have defects in their production line. It's the luck of the consumer. In short, buy what you can afford and prefer. It is like buying a Toyota over a Mercedes and vice versa.
Also the fact having a carbon bike versus a steel bike is the smoothness on the road. That's the main difference. Third, his bad experience with DA and ultegra components doesn't represents the quality of its product as a whole. Every brand on this planet will have defects in their production line. It's the luck of the consumer. In short, buy what you can afford and prefer. It is like buying a Toyota over a Mercedes and vice versa.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 2,470
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker, Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, Dahon Mu P 24 , Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Rodriguez Tandem, Wheeler MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
While I tend to agree with the video, a high end bicycle is a lot cheaper than a high end motorcycle. Apples to apples
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,206
Bikes: Jamis Quest Comp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
A rider that does 4000 miles per year, and a 17 mph average, rides 235 hours per year. After 4 years, that's 940 hours. So, writing off the whole cost of a $6000 bike in just 4 years, it's costing $6.38 per hour. Is that worth it to you? Go buy the bike. If not, keep riding your other bike.
Are there posts on car forums about not needing the $5000 package of leather seats, fancy wheels, upgraded sound system, and LED headlights?
Are there posts on car forums about not needing the $5000 package of leather seats, fancy wheels, upgraded sound system, and LED headlights?
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#35
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
I stopped watching after 18 minutes. I really wanted to jump up and down supporting this guy's premise before watching the video, but I just can't get excited.
It took 10 minutes to basically say that the rest of the video was going to be comparing a high end bike with an entry level bike.
When he finally got to the point of discussing the issue, he makes some points I tend to agree with, but backs them up with "statistics" he seems to be pulling out of thin air...
Things like a mid-level cyclist would ride 2 mph faster, and a recreational rider 1.5 mph faster ont he high end bike... They may be valid numbers, but for a 37 (THIRTY-SEVEN) minute video, I would expect more than a couple of buzz lines repeated many times with some numbers thrown in without any reference to support them.
Then he goes on to proclaim that Ultegra and Dura-Ace are crap. As much as I dislikre the elitist pricing of Shimano components, I don't think Ultegra and Dura-Ace are crap, or nobody in the pro ranks would ride Shimano components.
I think a better video could be done making the main points more effectively, and could be done in well under 15 minutes.
But, I agree with his premise. Recreational riders don't need to invest 5 figures into a bicycle. In my opinion, even though a buyer is free to do so, I think they should go in realizing what the cost difference really gets them (or doesn't).
It took 10 minutes to basically say that the rest of the video was going to be comparing a high end bike with an entry level bike.
When he finally got to the point of discussing the issue, he makes some points I tend to agree with, but backs them up with "statistics" he seems to be pulling out of thin air...
Things like a mid-level cyclist would ride 2 mph faster, and a recreational rider 1.5 mph faster ont he high end bike... They may be valid numbers, but for a 37 (THIRTY-SEVEN) minute video, I would expect more than a couple of buzz lines repeated many times with some numbers thrown in without any reference to support them.
Then he goes on to proclaim that Ultegra and Dura-Ace are crap. As much as I dislikre the elitist pricing of Shimano components, I don't think Ultegra and Dura-Ace are crap, or nobody in the pro ranks would ride Shimano components.
I think a better video could be done making the main points more effectively, and could be done in well under 15 minutes.
But, I agree with his premise. Recreational riders don't need to invest 5 figures into a bicycle. In my opinion, even though a buyer is free to do so, I think they should go in realizing what the cost difference really gets them (or doesn't).
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,811
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 184 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
90 Posts
My first bike was a $99 Huffy [admittedly I was younger].
My second bike was a ~$400 Trek Hybrid that I still ride and love.
Looking at maybe getting a cyclocross or a higher end hybrid mostly for the upgraded brakes/wheels/frame but it's certainly not necessary - I will get by just fine on my Trek I have now but I have some money and I really like the way the newer bikes look and the upgraded brakes are a big one for me - the rest is just nice to have.
If you think a bike is too expensive the solution is simple -> don't buy it .
My second bike was a ~$400 Trek Hybrid that I still ride and love.
Looking at maybe getting a cyclocross or a higher end hybrid mostly for the upgraded brakes/wheels/frame but it's certainly not necessary - I will get by just fine on my Trek I have now but I have some money and I really like the way the newer bikes look and the upgraded brakes are a big one for me - the rest is just nice to have.
If you think a bike is too expensive the solution is simple -> don't buy it .
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
How is it you can have bicycles that cost more than a decent motorcycle?
If you've seen this video, do you think there any fallacies in what he talks about?
Bicycle Truth: Weight Scam - True cost of riding - YouTube
If you've seen this video, do you think there any fallacies in what he talks about?
Bicycle Truth: Weight Scam - True cost of riding - YouTube
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
[b]The thing I did not understand why the narrator comparing a TT bike to a road bike.]/b] 99.99999999% of recreational cyclists would not go out and buy a TT bike. I don't even think a LBS would even have the conscience to suggest a TT bike to a recreational user even if Bill Gates was the buyer. So the comparison between the two is like what he said, "apples and oranges" so the purpose of the narrator's intention of comparing the two is strange. The comparison between a motorcycle and road bike was also strange and has no meaning. I won't go into that.
Also the fact having a carbon bike versus a steel bike is the smoothness on the road. That's the main difference. Third, his bad experience with DA and ultegra components doesn't represents the quality of its product as a whole. Every brand on this planet will have defects in their production line. It's the luck of the consumer. In short, buy what you can afford and prefer. It is like buying a Toyota over a Mercedes and vice versa.
Also the fact having a carbon bike versus a steel bike is the smoothness on the road. That's the main difference. Third, his bad experience with DA and ultegra components doesn't represents the quality of its product as a whole. Every brand on this planet will have defects in their production line. It's the luck of the consumer. In short, buy what you can afford and prefer. It is like buying a Toyota over a Mercedes and vice versa.
You don't? Video won't load for me but just from reading this thread I do.
He needed it to make his case. Of course it backfired big time for you and I suspect any person actually knowledgeable about bikes.
#39
2 Fat 2 Furious
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: England
Posts: 3,996
Bikes: 2009 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Disc, 2009 Specialized Tricross Sport RIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
ETA: Compared to buying the Rolex it's cheaper to buy a used car that comes with a clock in it, that can also get you from A to B much more easily than the Rolex ever could.
__________________
"For a list of ways technology has failed to improve quality of life, press three"
"For a list of ways technology has failed to improve quality of life, press three"
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I just want to point out one thing about good quality bikes, they last. I bought mine for about $1700.
About 20 years ago,
The seat has worn through is a couple of spots. Both wheels have been replaced because of pothole impacts over the years making them nearly untrueable. I don't even want to think of how many tire replacements, pretty much all simple wear.
But the frame and groupo are all still fine.
I consider it money well spent.
About 20 years ago,
The seat has worn through is a couple of spots. Both wheels have been replaced because of pothole impacts over the years making them nearly untrueable. I don't even want to think of how many tire replacements, pretty much all simple wear.
But the frame and groupo are all still fine.
I consider it money well spent.
#41
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
SRAM had a good run for a few years, but it's back to shimano domination as always. Suntour did all right back in the 80's and part of the 90's.
Campagnolo is still a player in the high end but shimano has eaten away at campy's share of the racing market in a huge way also.
Shimano has a near monopoly on bicycle componentry. This has to affect the pricing structure of bikes.
Campagnolo is still a player in the high end but shimano has eaten away at campy's share of the racing market in a huge way also.
Shimano has a near monopoly on bicycle componentry. This has to affect the pricing structure of bikes.
#42
Senior Member
I couldn't watch all of it but he completely ignores the fact all of the low-mid range performance bikes benefit from the high end development.
Call it trickle down tech, but the fact is they are enjoying bikes that were considered high end a short time ago.
There is a cost to development, and a risk.
10 years from now, he will be saying how no one needs to buy anything more than a $700 carbon Di2 105 because there is no value in the high end
unobtainium frame and Di5 that runs 5 years on a watch battery.
btw,
I agree that the biggest factor in performance is the engine. Plenty of people can do very well with a sub-1K bike.
Nothing wrong with that.
However, it does not negate bikes costing more. Faulty logic.
Call it trickle down tech, but the fact is they are enjoying bikes that were considered high end a short time ago.
There is a cost to development, and a risk.
10 years from now, he will be saying how no one needs to buy anything more than a $700 carbon Di2 105 because there is no value in the high end
unobtainium frame and Di5 that runs 5 years on a watch battery.
btw,
I agree that the biggest factor in performance is the engine. Plenty of people can do very well with a sub-1K bike.
Nothing wrong with that.
However, it does not negate bikes costing more. Faulty logic.
#43
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 193
Bikes: Giant Cypress DX
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#44
Senior Member
I think anyone who feels that their paricular value assessment should apply to all is displaying arrogance. But no, I don't feel that all people think this way. Thankfully, many are open-minded enough to accept that one person may validly choose the most basic form of two-wheeled transportation while another may just as validly choose something beyond that.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 546
Bikes: 2009 Surly Cross Check Frankenbike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The internet has become a lot like TV. We all spend too much time watching pointless stuff.
Unless somebody is starving their children or something in order to buy a blingy bike, why should I care?
Unless somebody is starving their children or something in order to buy a blingy bike, why should I care?
#46
Senior Member
I watched this video several months ago and it wasn't even worth thinking about. Expensive things exist. Dehydrated Folgers coffee and Kona Peaberry coffee are both caffeinated so why by the expensive Hawaii stuff? The reasons don't need to be based on anything other than desire when purchasing luxury items.
Plus, cost is almost never directly proportionate to quality, value, or increase performance, it's almost always exponentially diminishing.
Cost scales between items with some overlap. There are some motorcycles that cost more than a decent car. There are cars that cost more than a decent house.
Plus, cost is almost never directly proportionate to quality, value, or increase performance, it's almost always exponentially diminishing.
How is it you can have bicycles that cost more than a decent motorcycle?
Last edited by GhostSS; 05-20-14 at 05:36 PM.
#49
Guest
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I stopped watching after 18 minutes. I really wanted to jump up and down supporting this guy's premise before watching the video, but I just can't get excited.
It took 10 minutes to basically say that the rest of the video was going to be comparing a high end bike with an entry level bike.
When he finally got to the point of discussing the issue, he makes some points I tend to agree with, but backs them up with "statistics" he seems to be pulling out of thin air...
Things like a mid-level cyclist would ride 2 mph faster, and a recreational rider 1.5 mph faster ont he high end bike... They may be valid numbers, but for a 37 (THIRTY-SEVEN) minute video, I would expect more than a couple of buzz lines repeated many times with some numbers thrown in without any reference to support them.
Then he goes on to proclaim that Ultegra and Dura-Ace are crap. As much as I dislikre the elitist pricing of Shimano components, I don't think Ultegra and Dura-Ace are crap, or nobody in the pro ranks would ride Shimano components.
I think a better video could be done making the main points more effectively, and could be done in well under 15 minutes.
But, I agree with his premise. Recreational riders don't need to invest 5 figures into a bicycle. In my opinion, even though a buyer is free to do so, I think they should go in realizing what the cost difference really gets them (or doesn't).
It took 10 minutes to basically say that the rest of the video was going to be comparing a high end bike with an entry level bike.
When he finally got to the point of discussing the issue, he makes some points I tend to agree with, but backs them up with "statistics" he seems to be pulling out of thin air...
Things like a mid-level cyclist would ride 2 mph faster, and a recreational rider 1.5 mph faster ont he high end bike... They may be valid numbers, but for a 37 (THIRTY-SEVEN) minute video, I would expect more than a couple of buzz lines repeated many times with some numbers thrown in without any reference to support them.
Then he goes on to proclaim that Ultegra and Dura-Ace are crap. As much as I dislikre the elitist pricing of Shimano components, I don't think Ultegra and Dura-Ace are crap, or nobody in the pro ranks would ride Shimano components.
I think a better video could be done making the main points more effectively, and could be done in well under 15 minutes.
But, I agree with his premise. Recreational riders don't need to invest 5 figures into a bicycle. In my opinion, even though a buyer is free to do so, I think they should go in realizing what the cost difference really gets them (or doesn't).
#50
Twilight Requiem
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lonely Mountain
Posts: 461
Bikes: TrekFX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Aside from pro-athletes and wealthy racers(God bless them).. there is big money to be made from men going through Mid-Life Crisis.