Mountain Bike Century
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,017
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have never really spent much time on a Road Bike. I am aware of the stated differences between a MTB being geometry, weight, tires, gearing etc. However, I know that the engine is pretty important as well. My question concerns the DEGREE of difference between the Road Bike and the Mountain Bike.
If I were to do a century in exactly the same weather conditions on an entry level Mountain Bike with 1.4 Slick tires how much slower would I be than if I rode an entry level road bike. I just want a general answer as i know there are other variables such as gearing on the respective bikes.
I just want a general idea. How much longer would it take to do the 100 miles on the MTB?
If I were to do a century in exactly the same weather conditions on an entry level Mountain Bike with 1.4 Slick tires how much slower would I be than if I rode an entry level road bike. I just want a general answer as i know there are other variables such as gearing on the respective bikes.
I just want a general idea. How much longer would it take to do the 100 miles on the MTB?
#2
WALSTIB
I would think difference is more aerodynamic than anything unless you can push a 52 tooth alot.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,698
Bikes: 2006 custom Walt Works roadie, 2003 Fuji Finest (road), 2002 Giant Iguana (mtb), 1986 BMW K75 (motor)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Isn't the diameter of the wheel a factor? If so, then a road bike would be 27/26 times (4%) more efficient (plus whatever other factors), right?
EDIT: but the mt.bike would allow you to do an off-road century and that's mas macho! Like White Rim in Utah.
EDIT: but the mt.bike would allow you to do an off-road century and that's mas macho! Like White Rim in Utah.
#4
Beauty Everywhere
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,596
Bikes: 2006 Giant Anthem, Specialized Dolce Elite 05
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Maybe you should look into getting an inexpensive road bike and do a century. Then you can really test and see if you want to invest more into a roadbike. I never thought I would get on a roadbike, but I love it now and my mountain bike is getting dusty. Try it and see if you like it.
#5
Respect Your Hill
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 236
Bikes: 2007 Colnago CLX Carbon, 2 Cannondale R2000Si's (road), 1 Trek (road), 1 Cannondale (Mtn)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I rode my first six centuries on a mountain bike. Two with knobbies and the last four with slicks. Each ride, I managed to ride with roadies and they were amazed that I could keep up. I didn't know any different and had no idea why my ride should be more difficult than theirs.
When I finally switched to a road bike I felt weightless. How much faster was I? I never had a speedometer on the mountain bike, so I'm not sure. But I do believe that riding the heavier bike and spinning my butt off to keep up with the roadies helped me to develop a real efficient pedal stroke and made me a stronger rider.
The one thing that sucked about riding the mountain bike with slicks was that the wide suface was a magnet for every little particle of road debris and flatted WAY too often. (advice - never ride a century in the rain with mtn bike slicks)
My guestimate for speed loss/gain with equal effort would be -for example, if you comfortably rode a century averaging @ 17 mph on a road bike, the mountain bike w/slicks, given the same effort would be more like 15ish mph. (But you'd crank on the downhills!!)
Sorry for the babbling - Of course, I have no scientific or measurable answer for your question.
When I finally switched to a road bike I felt weightless. How much faster was I? I never had a speedometer on the mountain bike, so I'm not sure. But I do believe that riding the heavier bike and spinning my butt off to keep up with the roadies helped me to develop a real efficient pedal stroke and made me a stronger rider.
The one thing that sucked about riding the mountain bike with slicks was that the wide suface was a magnet for every little particle of road debris and flatted WAY too often. (advice - never ride a century in the rain with mtn bike slicks)
My guestimate for speed loss/gain with equal effort would be -for example, if you comfortably rode a century averaging @ 17 mph on a road bike, the mountain bike w/slicks, given the same effort would be more like 15ish mph. (But you'd crank on the downhills!!)
Sorry for the babbling - Of course, I have no scientific or measurable answer for your question.
#6
1/2 a binding 1/2 a brain
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dillon, CO
Posts: 1,707
Bikes: Serotta Ottrott ST, Titus RX100, Seven Sola 29er HT in the works
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by LordOpie
but the mt.bike would allow you to do an off-road century like White Rim in Utah.
It's an annual event every October two weeks before the 24 hours of Moab. Kind of a team pow-wow and to see who has legs.
It takes us 12 hours at a gentlemanly competitive pace. But you gotta haul all your water from the start. I take 1.5 gallons.
Woof!
#7
eert a ekil yzarc
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pasadena TX
Posts: 2,560
Bikes: many bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I did my first metric century on old beater Mt. bike. I had used it for city commuting primarily. I had changed out the chain rings to something like 48/38/28, the cassette was 13-34. I had put some dyno fireball balloon cruiser tires on it. For the most part I kept up with the roadies. At one stop, a group looked at my bike, and told me it was a torture device.
There was only one sketch part. At the beginning of the ride was the Fred Hartman Bridge. https://www.bayareahouston.com/Home/P...LaPortejoinsP/ Going up was ok. Going down was another story. I had max out my gears on the way down, and the bike started getting the high speed wobble. 5 minutes after the bridge I came up on a roller bladder that looked more stoked than I felt.
There was only one sketch part. At the beginning of the ride was the Fred Hartman Bridge. https://www.bayareahouston.com/Home/P...LaPortejoinsP/ Going up was ok. Going down was another story. I had max out my gears on the way down, and the bike started getting the high speed wobble. 5 minutes after the bridge I came up on a roller bladder that looked more stoked than I felt.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,698
Bikes: 2006 custom Walt Works roadie, 2003 Fuji Finest (road), 2002 Giant Iguana (mtb), 1986 BMW K75 (motor)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by telenick
White Rim in a day.
It's an annual event every October two weeks before the 24 hours of Moab. Kind of a team pow-wow and to see who has legs.
It takes us 12 hours at a gentlemanly competitive pace. But you gotta haul all your water from the start. I take 1.5 gallons.
Woof!
It's an annual event every October two weeks before the 24 hours of Moab. Kind of a team pow-wow and to see who has legs.
It takes us 12 hours at a gentlemanly competitive pace. But you gotta haul all your water from the start. I take 1.5 gallons.
Woof!
#9
52-week commuter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,929
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Cannonday, Specialized, RANS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by LordOpie
Isn't the diameter of the wheel a factor? If so, then a road bike would be 27/26 times (4%) more efficient (plus whatever other factors), right?
It would be a good thing for the industry to move away from rigid standards. It's silly not to have wheel size scale with frame size. Short riders in particular suffer -- it's hard (some would say impossible) to make a bike with acceptable geometry and 700cm wheels for someone under 5'4". Smaller wheels might help you get a better fitting bike if you are smaller than average.
Ken Kifer has a great riff on the subject:
"One of the oddest tales, and also clear proof of how us cyclists let ourselves be pushed around, is the story of tire sizes. When I started riding as an adult, all the bikes had 26-inch tires. My first "10-speed" (6 useful gears) came with 27-inch tires, forcing me to buy tires at bike shops (which are hard to find on a tour). A dozen years ago came a "great" improvement created by shifting from 27-inch to 700 cc tires. Article after article raved about the improvement. The only difference I can see is the need to stop at a bike shop rather than Kmart. Then came a new shift, where to? -- the 26 inch bike; only the tires on this bike are a different size from the old 26 incher. Can't you tell you're being flimflammed? Slight differences in the diameter of the wheel have no noticeable effect. The whole purpose of the different tire sizes is to force you to buy tires from one company rather than another or at a bike shop rather than a discount store."
#10
1/2 a binding 1/2 a brain
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dillon, CO
Posts: 1,707
Bikes: Serotta Ottrott ST, Titus RX100, Seven Sola 29er HT in the works
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by LordOpie
Am I to understand that you drink 16 ounces/hour? I think I'd need nearly double that? No aid stations, huh? Someone should organize a supported White Rim event.
We actually ride from Potato Bottom to Island in the Sky Ranger Station where we have water and food stashed. So, that's 80 miles with 1.5 gallons plus a lot of hydrating on the first 20 miles.
#12
Site *****
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 503
Bikes: 1960 Malvern Star
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd settle for those neat plastic tassles that come out of the ends of your handlebars.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 234
Bikes: Lemond, Cannondale
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
This year I have done two centuries on my heavy low end MT bike with knobbies and two on my road bike and I have seen about a 2 mph difference, but the rides were all different with different variables. (temperature, wind, road selection, terrain and other intangibles)
#14
In Memory of One Cool Cat
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,722
Bikes: Lemond Victoire, Cannondale.Mountain Bike, two 1980s lugged steel Treks, ancient 1980-something Giant mountain bike converted into a slick tired commuter with mustache handlebars, 1960-something Raleigh Sports
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I would say that the fat knobby tires of any MTB vs. the narrow slick tires of even the most entry level of road bikes would make for a pretty significant difference in rolling resistance. Not only would your speed be affected but the amount of work you have to do to cover the mileage would be impacted pretty heavily.
__________________
Dead last finish is better than did not finish and infinitely better than did not start.
Dead last finish is better than did not finish and infinitely better than did not start.
#15
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I used to do offroad centuries on my MTB although I will say they were considerably slower than road centuries on my RB. Go figure. I never really did a pure road century on my MTB though but have ridden some half centuries with it. I will say that I probably average 2-3 MPH slower on my full-suspension MTB when compared with my RB.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#17
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
I have done quite a number of centuries on my mountain bike, and also my first 200K brevet.
The mountain bike centuries do take longer, but not necessarily by very much. It depends a lot on weather conditions.
My mountain bike centuries are done in the winter, often in sub-freezing temperatures. They run about 9 - 10 hours depending on how cold it is, or if there is snow or freezing rain, etc. My road bicycle centuries, usually done in the summer when the weather is much better, and I'm in better shape, range between 6 and 8 hours.
However, I can tell you about my 200K brevets:
2001 - 12 hours - done on my mtn bike
2002 - 13 hours - done on my road bicycle
2003 - 10 hours - done on my road bicycle
2004 - 10 hours - done on my road bicycle
2001, 2003, and 2004 all had pretty good weather; 2002 included over 100K of an incredibly heavy headwind. So I guess, given similar conditions, over 200 kms, the mtn bike takes me a couple hours longer, than a road bicycle (about 3 km/h difference).
The mountain bike centuries do take longer, but not necessarily by very much. It depends a lot on weather conditions.
My mountain bike centuries are done in the winter, often in sub-freezing temperatures. They run about 9 - 10 hours depending on how cold it is, or if there is snow or freezing rain, etc. My road bicycle centuries, usually done in the summer when the weather is much better, and I'm in better shape, range between 6 and 8 hours.
However, I can tell you about my 200K brevets:
2001 - 12 hours - done on my mtn bike
2002 - 13 hours - done on my road bicycle
2003 - 10 hours - done on my road bicycle
2004 - 10 hours - done on my road bicycle
2001, 2003, and 2004 all had pretty good weather; 2002 included over 100K of an incredibly heavy headwind. So I guess, given similar conditions, over 200 kms, the mtn bike takes me a couple hours longer, than a road bicycle (about 3 km/h difference).
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#18
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I just want clarification for the continuance of the thread... I think we need to make a distinction between 100 miles with a MTB over offroad terrain vs. 100 miles on a MTB on the road.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#19
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Originally Posted by khuon
I just want clarification for the continuance of the thread... I think we need to make a distinction between 100 miles with a MTB over offroad terrain vs. 100 miles on a MTB on the road.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#20
NFL Owner
I did Hotter 'n Hell on my MTB twice. Once the full Century, once I sagged at 60 miles due to a flat. I actually enjoyed it more on the MTB than on any of my road bikes because my MTB is fully suspended.
With barends, I had multiple hand positions, plus I tend to set up my MTB and road bikes so that I'm in the same basic position on both. I tend to stay in the small ring (39T) on my road bike, unless I'm going downhill, and in the large ring(42T) on the MTB (when on paved roads). With the slightly taller gearing, plus the 175mm (mtb) vs 170mm (road) cranks, I was actually able to maintain a faster average speed on my MTB than on previous rides on my road bike.
With barends, I had multiple hand positions, plus I tend to set up my MTB and road bikes so that I'm in the same basic position on both. I tend to stay in the small ring (39T) on my road bike, unless I'm going downhill, and in the large ring(42T) on the MTB (when on paved roads). With the slightly taller gearing, plus the 175mm (mtb) vs 170mm (road) cranks, I was actually able to maintain a faster average speed on my MTB than on previous rides on my road bike.
#21
Interocitor Command
All I can say is I'm jealous as Hell of all of you. I've had a nasty case of bronchitis and on top of it I now have caught a cold. Have only had 2 rides in almost 3 weeks! <cough> <cough>
I had such high hopes for this spring and a century on my MTB was one of my goals. As of tonight I feel as though I've lost all of the fitness I'd worked for since the first of the year 700 miles ago. The worst part of it is I've been taking medication for about 2 weeks and it isn't doing any good. $90 for a 30 day supply of Serevent and it isn't making a dent.
I had such high hopes for this spring and a century on my MTB was one of my goals. As of tonight I feel as though I've lost all of the fitness I'd worked for since the first of the year 700 miles ago. The worst part of it is I've been taking medication for about 2 weeks and it isn't doing any good. $90 for a 30 day supply of Serevent and it isn't making a dent.
#22
. . . rosebud . . .
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 875
Bikes: Diamondback Outlook
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Don't know about a century, but my average speed on my knobby-tired MTB is about 12.6mph for a metric century. It sure feels like slicks and a more aero position would help in the long run. And also high pressure tires.
#23
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,017
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by khuon
I just want clarification for the continuance of the thread... I think we need to make a distinction between 100 miles with a MTB over offroad terrain vs. 100 miles on a MTB on the road.
#24
NFL Owner
Originally Posted by Ranger
I am going to get some 1.4 Ritchey Tom Slicks and have some fun and do some experimenting.
#25
WALSTIB
I'm not a fast rider but I still think about the guy at the Hilly passing me by like I was sitting still. He was on a mountainbike with knobbies, 2 waterbottles and a Camelbak. Theres a rest area every 15 miles, so I guess he was just a thirsty person.