Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Helmet thickness

Old 12-21-14, 11:27 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 571
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Helmet thickness

I purchased a helmet from LBS for twice what helmets usually go for at Walmart.

At first I thought I got ripped off but when I really looked at the bike helmets from Walmart they were about half as thick as my helmet (I'm talking about the EPS).

Does this mean I actually got a good deal? More foam = more protection right? I hate how the CPSC doesn't bother to break down helmet ratings and simply issues a pass/fail. I wish testing like how the IIHS does with vehicles were conducted ...
Deontologist is offline  
Old 12-21-14, 11:48 PM
  #2  
The Improbable Bulk
 
Little Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Actually, higher price helmets tend to fit in one of the following (or more). Ignoring just buying at a more expensive place.

1) Lighter
2) Better air flow (cooler head)
3) Better retention systems
4) More aerodynamic
5) More "cool" factor... i.e. all the cool guys and gals wear them.
6) Constructed on machines run by high end artisan helmet constructeurs.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Little Darwin is offline  
Old 12-22-14, 08:28 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
Common sense and logic dictate the fact the thicker the foam, the better "G" mitigation it will perform.
rydabent is offline  
Old 12-22-14, 10:21 PM
  #4  
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,595

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3269 Post(s)
Liked 1,809 Times in 1,088 Posts
I guess it does stand to reason that helmets will perform differently based on construction, but I simply have no idea what-- and forgive the pun-- those break points are. I certainly hope to never find out the hard way. Better reporting from certification bodies would be nice, because yeah, it seems to come down to style, primarily, at this point.
chaadster is offline  
Old 12-22-14, 10:42 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 6,046
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1883 Post(s)
Liked 1,755 Times in 1,019 Posts
Originally Posted by Little Darwin
Actually, higher price helmets tend to fit in one of the following (or more). Ignoring just buying at a more expensive place.

1) Lighter
2) Better air flow (cooler head)
3) Better retention systems
4) More aerodynamic
5) More "cool" factor... i.e. all the cool guys and gals wear them.
6) Constructed on machines run by high end artisan helmet constructeurs.
Agree with the first 3 points, After that cynicism kicks in.
I always buy helmets based fit, and safety. After that, I hope to find decent ventilation. If aerodynamics results in poor ventilation, I pass. Cool factor? You should see a picture of me wearing the original Bell Biker helmet, Dorky then, Dorky now.
I have always hoped that by wearing a helmet I would improve my chances of keeping myself mentallly intact if I had a bad crash
alcjphil is offline  
Old 12-23-14, 02:52 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
mrodgers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Western PA
Posts: 1,649

Bikes: 2014 Giant Escape 1

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 289 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 20 Posts
Foam compresses when impacted. Helmet impacts ground and compresses for simple example 3 mm of the foam on the outside of the helmet. Head impacts the inside of the foam and compresses for example 3 mm of the foam. The foam thickness between these 2 points is unaffected. If a cheap helmet has adequate thickness for there to be an area between these points not to crush, then making it thicker does not result in better energy absorption. If a cheap helmet is thinner to where there is no area between these points, then a thicker foam would be "more protection."

Better than thickness would be to change the material. EPP has much higher energy absorption properties than EPS. But if EPS is adequate in absorption properties for head impact, then a more expensive and heavier material still doesn't make "more protection." Thus, EPS is used in helmets for the weight property. At I am guessing less than $1.00/lb for EPS (I extrude, expand, and mold EPP and EPE, no experience manufacturing or selling EPS), you are paying for the shape design of the "better" helmet for the first 3, reasons listed above in Little Darwin's post.
mrodgers is offline  
Old 12-30-14, 03:30 PM
  #7  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrodgers
Foam compresses when impacted. Helmet impacts ground and compresses for simple example 3 mm of the foam on the outside of the helmet. Head impacts the inside of the foam and compresses for example 3 mm of the foam. The foam thickness between these 2 points is unaffected. If a cheap helmet has adequate thickness for there to be an area between these points not to crush, then making it thicker does not result in better energy absorption. If a cheap helmet is thinner to where there is no area between these points, then a thicker foam would be "more protection."

Better than thickness would be to change the material. EPP has much higher energy absorption properties than EPS. But if EPS is adequate in absorption properties for head impact, then a more expensive and heavier material still doesn't make "more protection." Thus, EPS is used in helmets for the weight property. At I am guessing less than $1.00/lb for EPS (I extrude, expand, and mold EPP and EPE, no experience manufacturing or selling EPS), you are paying for the shape design of the "better" helmet for the first 3, reasons listed above in Little Darwin's post.
What's your favorite helmet? The new Giro Synthe helmets look really nice, and I'm a newby who hates his current Bell thick dorky helmet.
Emonda is offline  
Old 12-30-14, 05:50 PM
  #8  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Deontologist
I purchased a helmet from LBS for twice what helmets usually go for at Walmart.

At first I thought I got ripped off but when I really looked at the bike helmets from Walmart they were about half as thick as my helmet (I'm talking about the EPS).

Does this mean I actually got a good deal? More foam = more protection right? I hate how the CPSC doesn't bother to break down helmet ratings and simply issues a pass/fail. I wish testing like how the IIHS does with vehicles were conducted ...
Originally Posted by rydabent
Common sense and logic dictate the fact the thicker the foam, the better "G" mitigation it will perform.
Maybe, maybe not. Depends on the quality, density, etc of the foam. Price is no guarantee.

I buy what is comfortable and fits me. The best helmet is the one that is worn and worn properly, if you are going to wear a helmet.

The CSPC standards are pretty low. Years ago there was the Snell certification, to the best of my knowledge it isn't used by bicycle helmet manufacturers any more.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cyclist0084
General Cycling Discussion
50
05-05-13 04:50 PM
blk
Road Cycling
4
10-09-12 06:56 PM
clarknick67
Road Cycling
29
12-02-10 04:00 PM
WoundedKnee
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
28
01-22-10 09:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.