Trek fx series ?
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Summit, NJ
Bikes: Klein Q-Pro Carbon Team, Trek FX7.3, Bianchi Campione d'italia
was up in northern part of the lower peninsula of Michigan last week...rode on chipseal, paved path on Mackinac Island, and dirt with my 2007 FX 7.3.....took it all in stride....only difficulty was the engine was a bit in need of repair! ;-)
Last edited by homebody146; 09-24-09 at 02:16 PM.
#27
Wow great info guys thanks so much. I don't know much about bikes so the diffrences between the 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 don't make sense to me. I understand better tires and better frame but the rest has me confused. I'm sorry I'm a complete noob and as of right now I'm liking the 7.1 for the matte black finish. (please don't throw a brick at me). I'm just going to use the bike to ride around the block and ride it at the park. Would it still make sense to spend the extra money on a 7.3 ? Once again I'm sorry for asking these noob questions.
Black on a hyrbid is the very cool. Based on your intended riding profile, the 7.1 will probably fit the bill.
#28
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: East metro-Atlanta
I agree that the 7.3 offers a lot of bang for the buck. My wife rides a 7.3 WSD because she loved the matte nickel color and hated the matte black on the 7.5 WSD.
The only problem with the 7.3 was the EF60 shifters; they were OK for me, but the trigger and thumb levers are poorly located for small hands. FWIW, I replaced the EF60's with Deore LX shifters (plus a 9 speed cassette and chain).
The only problem with the 7.3 was the EF60 shifters; they were OK for me, but the trigger and thumb levers are poorly located for small hands. FWIW, I replaced the EF60's with Deore LX shifters (plus a 9 speed cassette and chain).
#29
IMO, comparing a 7.2 and 7.3 in test rides is a bit unfair. The tires on each are very different and thus feel very different. The ride on my 7.2 felt vastly different after changing the tires to something narrower with higher pressure. I would venture to guess that they might feel much more similar with the same set of tires when comparing. I wonder if bike shops would allow swapping 7.3 wheels/tires onto a 7.2 for testing purposes...
#30
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Kansas city
Bikes: Trek 820

IMO, comparing a 7.2 and 7.3 in test rides is a bit unfair. The tires on each are very different and thus feel very different. The ride on my 7.2 felt vastly different after changing the tires to something narrower with higher pressure. I would venture to guess that they might feel much more similar with the same set of tires when comparing. I wonder if bike shops would allow swapping 7.3 wheels/tires onto a 7.2 for testing purposes...
#31
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Bikes: 2009 Trek FX 7.1
My 2 cents
I'm both new here and new to biking, I haven't been on a bike for 20 years. I bought a 2009 FX 7.1 in May without much research, I went to my LBS and rode several bikes and seeing how my riding would be for fitness and playing with my kids, I didn't see the value in spending more. I haven't regretted my decision and enjoy my 7.1. I am only beginning to learn about bikes and all the upgrades that are out there, I will probably add a few things to my bike but I do not plan on upgrading any of the key components unless they break.
I ride on the road as well as paved and gravel trails and have not had any problems with the bike. I did a 60 mile ride this morning and the bike worked like a charm. I will probably do more research for my next bike but that won't be for while. The 7.1 is the bike for me.
I ride on the road as well as paved and gravel trails and have not had any problems with the bike. I did a 60 mile ride this morning and the bike worked like a charm. I will probably do more research for my next bike but that won't be for while. The 7.1 is the bike for me.
#35
Interesting. It seems the jump in pricing is around 280, 7.2 to 7.3, 7.3 to 7.5, 7.5 to 7.6. BUT it takes steep jump to the 7.7, 660 bucks.
The 7.5 and up seems to have a carbon fork and a kind of damper on the seatstay. Reportedly they make them "smoother" in riding. The 7.6 seems to jump up the gearing to road levels; plus it goes closer to road with 28mm tires.
With an 18 year old bike, obviously I'm thinking about my next one (one thing I do NOT like about my 750 is the damn twist shifters, I hate those devices). The only thing I am 100% convinced of is Trek's "fitness" may be a very apt tag for the fx series. AND the more I learn about the fx, the more I think I should also consideer the 7xxx series, they SEEM to trade some of the speed for comfort.
The 7.5 and up seems to have a carbon fork and a kind of damper on the seatstay. Reportedly they make them "smoother" in riding. The 7.6 seems to jump up the gearing to road levels; plus it goes closer to road with 28mm tires.
With an 18 year old bike, obviously I'm thinking about my next one (one thing I do NOT like about my 750 is the damn twist shifters, I hate those devices). The only thing I am 100% convinced of is Trek's "fitness" may be a very apt tag for the fx series. AND the more I learn about the fx, the more I think I should also consideer the 7xxx series, they SEEM to trade some of the speed for comfort.




