Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Hybrid Bicycles
Reload this Page >

A longish tire question

Search
Notices
Hybrid Bicycles Where else would you go to discuss these fun, versatile bikes?

A longish tire question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-12 | 04:29 PM
  #1  
MadProphet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drink my Koolaid
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Paradise CA

Bikes: 2013 Trek DS 8.3 (sold) '13 Trek Domane 2.0 (sold) '18 Trek Super Commuter 8s

A longish tire question

I bought a Trek 8.3 DS and do love it. I'm putting about 5-9 miles, every two days on it.

If you've read my previous posts about me, skip this whole paragraph: I'm 51, recently went from 365 to 225lbs and haven't ridden since gas was .55 a gallon and all the cool cars had CB's. I need to add activity to my life and even though I have a completely destroyed back (multiple surgeries) and lots of nerve problems in my legs, I'm going to ride.

Further (about where I live), I live in a VERY hilly environment on the ridge of the foothills leading to the Sierra Nevada mountains. I live at 1825', while my town goes from 1100 to nearly 2500' - in about six miles. There is a central bike trail (from train to trail conversion) running through the center of town (basically, up and down). I started at about 2.4 miles last month and have built up to around 5-9 miles, with 400-600' elevation gains. The trail is paved, but we have extreme weather conditions and that means the trail (and the town) get the crap kicked out of it. We just endured 42" of rain in seven days. Our yearly average is 59".

So, I got the LR2 tires with the bike - 700cx38. They are 60psi tires. While they are a LOT easier to ride than the MTB tires, I'd still like to have a tire with a bit less rolling resistance. I would like something with more puncture protection, as well. I had Schwable Big Apples on my 'bent trike, and I liked the brand. Though obviously not considering BA's!

Once I start looking, there are just tons of choices. I was thinking something like the Marathon Plus or GG's in same size. I'm wondering if others have used these on hybrids and what their experiences were.

On a separate note, I'm also wondering about tubeless. I keep seeing 'kits' to do this and they are over $200! Should I go with a kit or just get dedicated wheel/tire combinations that are tubeless designated?

What I'm trying to achieve is less rolling resistance, good traction on pine needles and leaves and puncture resistance. I'd also love to keep some ability to use a dirt trail if the opportunity presents itself.

Or am I looking for the impossible?
MadProphet is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-12 | 06:49 PM
  #2  
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
Really Old Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,678
Likes: 1,915
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

There are trade offs.
Hard packed dirt and a very minimal tread will suffice. A bit looser dirt or pine needles/leaves and you're in a totally different ball game.
Bill Kapaun is online now  
Reply
Old 12-05-12 | 04:38 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 571
Likes: 1
From: Maryland

Bikes: Hollands Touring Bike, Schwinn mountain bike, folding bike, tandem and triple

For pavement I like Vittoria Randonneur Hyper. I use 700x38c but they come in 700x32 & 35c as well. Low drag, highly puncture resistant and fast.
ClemY is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-12 | 07:26 AM
  #4  
Barrettscv's Avatar
Have bike, will travel
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,286
Likes: 317
From: Lake Geneva, WI

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Originally Posted by ClemY
For pavement I like Vittoria Randonneur Hyper. I use 700x38c but they come in 700x32 & 35c as well. Low drag, highly puncture resistant and fast.
+1

I have the Vittoria Hyper in both the 700x38 and the 700x32 size. The 700x32 measure out to 34mm wide on a 23mm wide rim. It is a good size for most of my riding. The tire is very stable with great traction on pavement and gravel. Wet gravel causes no issues, but wet mud and wet silty soil can be a problem. I just ride carefully on off-camber turns if the ground is wet.

The tire is light but tough. It will make climbing easier without a doubt.

Another issue to consider is the front suspension fork on your Trek. You might notice some travel (the fork going up and down) as you pedal. The fork is reducing the power going to the rear wheel when that happens.

Be sure to use the lock-out feature on your fork when climbing. This will make the climb easier.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.

Last edited by Barrettscv; 12-05-12 at 09:54 AM.
Barrettscv is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-12 | 10:44 AM
  #5  
pierce's Avatar
S'Cruzer
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 19
From: 122W 37N

Bikes: too many

I was down at the LBS and they had a pair of the Randonneur Hyper x38's on the shelf, which I noted were labeled 40-622 even tho they also said 700x38. this usually means the tire runs slightly oversize. I decided to go ahead and order the x35 size, and will report in when they get here and when I get them mounted.
pierce is offline  
Reply
Old 12-08-12 | 01:00 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 14
Big Apples wouldn't be bad really. Even though they are bigger and heavier, they don't necessarily have more rolling resistance and they may have less due to the tread pattern compared to your current tires. Maybe something like the Schwalbe Sillento or one of the Marathon tires would work for you.

It is important to note the distinction between rolling resistance and inertia. Rolling resistance is friction or drag resisting the rolling motion. Inertia is the resistance to change in state of motion. An object at rest wants to stay at rest and moving (or rotating) object wants to keep moving. When accelerating, bigger and heavier tires feel harder to roll because they are more difficult to accelerate, but this is due to inertia, not rolling resistance. Once up to speed, the power to keep the bike going is significantly less than that of accelerating it. The rolling tire wants to keep rolling if you keep the speed about the same.

Don't be too tempted to go narrower. A narrower tire doesn't necessarily have less rolling resistance and may in fact have more because the tire deforms more and becomes less round than a wider tire. This is assuming you are comparing similar tires. Assuming the same pressure, the wider tire deforms more in the width and less in the circumference so it stays more round than a narrower tire. I remember one guy here keeps swearing up and down that narrower tires have lower rolling resistance, but then I found out he was comparing knobby CX 38 or 25 to smooth 28 for street...It's only once you're up to about 20MPH where narrower tires start to become beneficial because aerodynamic drag becomes a bigger issue. On a Trek DS though, this isn't a huge concern because the upright riding position compared to road bikes will be a much bigger factor than the tire.

Last edited by jsdavis; 12-08-12 at 01:03 AM.
jsdavis is offline  
Reply
Old 12-08-12 | 09:39 AM
  #7  
Burton's Avatar
Certified Bike Brat
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,251
Likes: 6
From: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
There are trade offs.
Hard packed dirt and a very minimal tread will suffice. A bit looser dirt or pine needles/leaves and you're in a totally different ball game.
This

And tire performance with minimal tread just gets worse offroad in wet conditions. If you really have to deal with both paved sunny roads and wet offroad trails seriously suggest you consider two sets of wheels and different tires on each so you can pick and choose.
Burton is offline  
Reply
Old 12-08-12 | 04:04 PM
  #8  
pierce's Avatar
S'Cruzer
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 19
From: 122W 37N

Bikes: too many

Originally Posted by jsdavis
Don't be too tempted to go narrower. A narrower tire doesn't necessarily have less rolling resistance and may in fact have more because the tire deforms more and becomes less round than a wider tire. This is assuming you are comparing similar tires. Assuming the same pressure, the wider tire deforms more in the width and less in the circumference so it stays more round than a narrower tire..

except narrower tires inherently use higher pressures. a 25c tire probably has 110-120psi in it, while a 35c hybrid tire is more like 60-80psi. if the same weight rider put 60psi in that 25c, they'd pinch flat the first time they hit a crack in the pavement.
pierce is offline  
Reply
Old 12-10-12 | 01:40 PM
  #9  
MadProphet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drink my Koolaid
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Paradise CA

Bikes: 2013 Trek DS 8.3 (sold) '13 Trek Domane 2.0 (sold) '18 Trek Super Commuter 8s

Since I'm keeping the LT2's at 60 - which is what they are rated for - and they seem to flatten out more than a bit under my load, should I be considering a higher pressure tire? Should they 'flatten out' under my 225lbs?

I keep seeing that people consider tires to be a good upgrade. I changed my bars to the Iso-zone model and those helped a bit in the hand numb category. I changed out my pedals for Wellgo B-67's and I like the extra room they give. I added a Selle saddle and finally can make it 6-7 miles before pain sets in. I'm just thinking that new tires - especially ones with a little higher pressure, would add that reduction in rolling resistance.

Please keep in mind I'm totally new to this and so am not arguing against advice, rather my questions are for clarification.

Next I'm gonna be asking about IGH's... Alfine 8 or 11?
MadProphet is offline  
Reply
Old 12-10-12 | 01:54 PM
  #10  
pierce's Avatar
S'Cruzer
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 19
From: 122W 37N

Bikes: too many

Originally Posted by pierce
I was down at the LBS and they had a pair of the Randonneur Hyper x38's on the shelf, which I noted were labeled 40-622 even tho they also said 700x38. this usually means the tire runs slightly oversize. I decided to go ahead and order the x35 size, and will report in when they get here and when I get them mounted.
and actually, I got said Hyper Randonneurs in x32, which pumped to 70psi measure 33mm on my 1" wide OD rims. and they go like grease compared with the Nimbus my bike came with! felt like I was flying up the small hills on my 15 mile loop yesterday. https://goo.gl/maps/1uA1s
pierce is offline  
Reply
Old 12-24-12 | 01:01 PM
  #11  
Wanderer's Avatar
aka Phil Jungels
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,234
Likes: 91
From: North Aurora, IL

Bikes: 08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp

Get a set of Schwalbe Marathon Supremes, and run 'em at 92PSI. You will be amazed at the difference.
Wanderer is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skankingbiker
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
6
09-20-19 08:05 PM
gauvins
Touring
3
08-18-17 07:47 AM
Myosmith
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
3
07-26-12 04:30 AM
BetweenRides
Commuting
5
11-21-11 11:37 AM
My1stRoadBike
Mountain Biking
8
07-04-11 12:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.