An Introduction
#1
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 38
Likes: 1
An Introduction
Hello,
I watched a video recently where it was said that pro cyclists, and those in any athletic category, are physiologically different than those who are amateurs, hence the saying that "professional cyclists are born, not made". This kept occurring to me as I was passed by another cyclist who looked more like a football player and peddled line one too, and again as I was overtaken a second time, but on a different day, by someone who looked more appropriate on his bike. I had the chance to catch up to the second rider as there was a stop light that turned red soon after he sped by, and although he had ridden at a speed surpassing my own, the motivation given to me to reach him helped me close the distance between us, which I may have otherwise not been able to had I continued at my regular cadence. As I pulled up to him, I asked how he rides so fast, not expecting to receive a comprehensive answer, but simply out of the desire to express an elated puzzlement. He laughed and said I must not have ridden with fast cyclists before. The light turned green and we parted, but I met him again as further ahead was a road block. This time I asked if he was in pain, as I felt not depleted, but wearied from unaccustomed effort of trying to match him. He said always and was like me, out here to get a good exercise. So back to the difference between cyclists of different ambitions, when I am again on a ride, is it foolish to feel a belated competition with these rides who have passed me, as it could very well be that the differences between us will remain constant since although I can acquire greater fitness, I can't be naturally gifted?
I watched a video recently where it was said that pro cyclists, and those in any athletic category, are physiologically different than those who are amateurs, hence the saying that "professional cyclists are born, not made". This kept occurring to me as I was passed by another cyclist who looked more like a football player and peddled line one too, and again as I was overtaken a second time, but on a different day, by someone who looked more appropriate on his bike. I had the chance to catch up to the second rider as there was a stop light that turned red soon after he sped by, and although he had ridden at a speed surpassing my own, the motivation given to me to reach him helped me close the distance between us, which I may have otherwise not been able to had I continued at my regular cadence. As I pulled up to him, I asked how he rides so fast, not expecting to receive a comprehensive answer, but simply out of the desire to express an elated puzzlement. He laughed and said I must not have ridden with fast cyclists before. The light turned green and we parted, but I met him again as further ahead was a road block. This time I asked if he was in pain, as I felt not depleted, but wearied from unaccustomed effort of trying to match him. He said always and was like me, out here to get a good exercise. So back to the difference between cyclists of different ambitions, when I am again on a ride, is it foolish to feel a belated competition with these rides who have passed me, as it could very well be that the differences between us will remain constant since although I can acquire greater fitness, I can't be naturally gifted?
#2
Hi there!
I know I'm not a naturally gifted cyclist, but I'm obsessed with putting forth my best effort every time out. I'd say your desire to compete with riders above your level is a good thing.
I know I'm not a naturally gifted cyclist, but I'm obsessed with putting forth my best effort every time out. I'd say your desire to compete with riders above your level is a good thing.




