Are you fat? Or were you?
#201
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
According to a meta-analysis published in JAMA, overweight people have lower mortality rates compared to normal weight people. Mildly obese people have the same mortality rates. More severely obese people have higher mortality rates.
"Relative to normal weight, obesity (all grades) and grades 2 and 3 obesity were both associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality. Grade 1 obesity was not associated with higher mortality, suggesting that the excess mortality in obesity may predominantly be due to elevated mortality at higher BMI levels. Overweight was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality. "
--JAMA | Association of All-Cause Mortality With Overweight and Obesity Using Standard Body Mass Index CategoriesA Systematic Review and Meta-analysisAll-Cause Mortality Using BMI Categories
IOW, it's good to be a little fat, but bad to be real fat.--JAMA | Association of All-Cause Mortality With Overweight and Obesity Using Standard Body Mass Index CategoriesA Systematic Review and Meta-analysisAll-Cause Mortality Using BMI Categories
#202
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
People who are overweight have a much higher chance for developing diabetes, stroke, cancer and heart disease... Being extremely skinny and underweight is not healthy but neither is it healthy to be overweight...As far as mortality rates go and who is going to live longer, it's like trying to predict the end of the world, too many variables, nobody knows, not even science.
Being overweight also increases your risk of sleep apnea and of joint issues ... which may result in mobility issues.
And for me personally, all of that is less about mortality, and more about quality of life.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Last edited by Machka; 03-26-15 at 06:29 PM.
#203
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
People who are overweight have a much higher chance for developing diabetes, stroke, cancer and heart disease... Being extremely skinny and underweight is not healthy but neither is it healthy to be overweight...As far as mortality rates go and who is going to live longer, it's like trying to predict the end of the world, too many variables, nobody knows, not even science.
Also, you're making a lot of conclusions as if you know for a fact that they're true. But you're not giving us any indication of how you know these things to be true. So really you're just shouting into the wind, as far as I'm concerned. I'm not going to believe you just because you have a computer and access to the internet!
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#204
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
It's hard to do a scientific study of quality of life because we all have different definitions, and the definitions change as our lives change over the years. Currently, quality of life is a clinical question, not a scientific question. It's a decision of individual patients, along with their health providers and families. I wish doctors would spend more time trying to understand individual quality of life concerns.
(BTW, this point was discussed in the JAMA article I linked to. The scientists are certainly aware of this issue.)
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
Last edited by Roody; 03-27-15 at 12:19 PM.
#205
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 456
Bikes: Trek 4900, Cannondale Cx-4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
According to a meta-analysis published in JAMA, overweight people have lower mortality rates compared to normal weight people. Mildly obese people have the same mortality rates. More severely obese people have higher mortality rates.
"Relative to normal weight, obesity (all grades) and grades 2 and 3 obesity were both associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality. Grade 1 obesity was not associated with higher mortality, suggesting that the excess mortality in obesity may predominantly be due to elevated mortality at higher BMI levels. Overweight was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality. "
--JAMA | Association of All-Cause Mortality With Overweight and Obesity Using Standard Body Mass Index CategoriesA Systematic Review and Meta-analysisAll-Cause Mortality Using BMI Categories
IOW, it's good to be a little fat, but bad to be real fat.--JAMA | Association of All-Cause Mortality With Overweight and Obesity Using Standard Body Mass Index CategoriesA Systematic Review and Meta-analysisAll-Cause Mortality Using BMI Categories
#206
Senior Member
My BMI is on the upper reaches of normal. I doubt my body fast percentage is very high but I don't have any way to nor interest in measuring it. If I stopped lifting weights I would only loose about 5 - 10 pounds. But I would be a lot more likely to injure myself in the woods on my days off.
#207
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 365
Bikes: 2015 Trek Domane 4.3, 1989 Schwinn Circuit, 2010 Yeti ASR 5, '80 Vitus 979 (being refurb'd)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Plus 1 billion.
Source: ME. Qualifications: 69 years on planet earth with periods of being fat and not-fat.
STP
#208
Author Guy
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: 2012 Roubaix Pro, 2011 Roubaix Expert, 2006 Tarmac S-Works
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
16.5 mile ride @15mpg in sunny, 70° weather. It seems the body reaches a plateau and stays there. I'm still hovering around 218.
Hmm, there may be a direct correlation between staid weight and the amount and type of food I eat. Potato chips are part of an essential food group are they not?
2015 (Mar 27): 878 Miles—64 Days—84 hrs ♂ Weekly Avg: 100
I didn't fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.
Hmm, there may be a direct correlation between staid weight and the amount and type of food I eat. Potato chips are part of an essential food group are they not?
2015 (Mar 27): 878 Miles—64 Days—84 hrs ♂ Weekly Avg: 100
I didn't fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.
#209
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
16.5 mile ride @15mpg in sunny, 70° weather. It seems the body reaches a plateau and stays there. I'm still hovering around 218.
Hmm, there may be a direct correlation between staid weight and the amount and type of food I eat. Potato chips are part of an essential food group are they not?
2015 (Mar 27): 878 Miles—64 Days—84 hrs ♂ Weekly Avg: 100
I didn't fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.
Hmm, there may be a direct correlation between staid weight and the amount and type of food I eat. Potato chips are part of an essential food group are they not?
2015 (Mar 27): 878 Miles—64 Days—84 hrs ♂ Weekly Avg: 100
I didn't fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#210
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
Some people feel they can have a better quality of life if they eat healthy and stay skinny. For other people, quality of life means being able to eat whatever they want. I'm kinda on the fence about this one!
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#211
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
I can eat whatever I want and I can enjoy 2-3 beers with my meals few times per week and still remain lean and have a healthy BMI...I do try to eat mostly whole unprocessed foods, but I also regularly eat foods which some health conscious people would consider junk and fattening. A lot of people think that alcohol is fattening, in my experience it's not as long as the alcohol intake is moderate.. It's all about physical activity, as long as I am physically active I won't gain extra weight.
#212
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
I can eat whatever I want and I can enjoy 2-3 beers with my meals few times per week and still remain lean and have a healthy BMI...I do try to eat mostly whole unprocessed foods, but I also regularly eat foods which some health conscious people would consider junk and fattening. A lot of people think that alcohol is fattening, in my experience it's not as long as the alcohol intake is moderate.. It's all about physical activity, as long as I am physically active I won't gain extra weight.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#213
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Yes I agree with that...I personally believe that vegan and vegetarian are just "fad" diets" which eventually can lead to health problems and nutritional deficiencies and affect athletic performance. A lot of vegans also suffer from moral superiority complex and self-righteousness. I don't think I've ever seen a vegan win an Olympic gold, OTOH vegans do make excellent eco warriors.
#214
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
Yes I agree with that...I personally believe that vegan and vegetarian are just "fad" diets" which eventually can lead to health problems and nutritional deficiencies and affect athletic performance. A lot of vegans also suffer from moral superiority complex and self-righteousness. I don't think I've ever seen a vegan win an Olympic gold, OTOH vegans do make excellent eco warriors.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#215
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seville, Spain
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: Brompton M6R, mountain bikes, Circe Omnis+ tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I personally believe that vegan and vegetarian are just "fad" diets" which eventually can lead to health problems and nutritional deficiencies and affect athletic performance. A lot of vegans also suffer from moral superiority complex and self-righteousness. I don't think I've ever seen a vegan win an Olympic gold, OTOH vegans do make excellent eco warriors.
#216
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
#217
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
This only proves that vegan athletes are in a small tiny minority. Only two of those athletes competed in power sports such as track sprinting and wrestling... BTW Carl Lewis was not a 100% vegan when he was at his best. He became a vegetarian later and that's when his sprinting performance went down hill from then on. Those type of articles are twisted and never 100% accurate, there is always two sides to the story.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#218
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1015 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This only proves that vegan athletes are in a small tiny minority. Only two of those athletes competed in power sports such as track sprinting and wrestling... BTW Carl Lewis was not a 100% vegan when he was at his best. He became a vegetarian later and that's when his sprinting performance went down hill from then on. Those type of articles are twisted and never 100% accurate, there is always two sides to the story.
#219
Senior Member
I can eat whatever I want and I can enjoy 2-3 beers with my meals few times per week and still remain lean and have a healthy BMI...I do try to eat mostly whole unprocessed foods, but I also regularly eat foods which some health conscious people would consider junk and fattening. A lot of people think that alcohol is fattening, in my experience it's not as long as the alcohol intake is moderate.. It's all about physical activity, as long as I am physically active I won't gain extra weight.
As my older brother always says, "it is easy to enjoy some of the luxuries in life - you only need to sacrifice some of the necessities"!
#220
Author Guy
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: 2012 Roubaix Pro, 2011 Roubaix Expert, 2006 Tarmac S-Works
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As for diet, I'm reminded of a sign in a restaurant: Eat Here, diet home.
I'm a firm believer that life's too short (especially at my age) to worry too much about what you eat. Enjoy life, just do it in moderation. The main thing is to move and stay reasonably healthy.
2015 (Mar 29): 909 Miles—66 Days—87 hrs ♂ Weekly Avg: 100
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting a tomato in a fruit salad.
#221
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1015 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You're welcome. The other article I cited made similar points and was maybe a little more balanced.
I don't think it's a good idea to make life changing decisions based on a couple articles. Most doctors and scientists still encourage obese patients to lose weight. But there are at least two sides to the issue. Anything dealing with the human body is very complex and contradictory. It will be many years before we have a full understanding of diet, weight, and exercise--if we ever do.
I don't think it's a good idea to make life changing decisions based on a couple articles. Most doctors and scientists still encourage obese patients to lose weight. But there are at least two sides to the issue. Anything dealing with the human body is very complex and contradictory. It will be many years before we have a full understanding of diet, weight, and exercise--if we ever do.
I have less concern for the actual fat content in my body. Being active is IMO more important. But if you're active enough, you won't be very fat.
Excess weight also works on your joints. If I gain ten pounds it makes me feel sluggish and heavy. Watch out. That's just the kind of feeling that makes one want to throw in the towel and grab another slice of pizza (made with refined flour that will have you hungry again in a little while).
The instinct to conserve energy has become the instinct to be lazy. Watch out because your power to rationalize what you want to do as "good for you" or at least "ok" is strong! If there's one thing humans are good at, it is rationalization. We all have a hearty power to ignore what doesn't fit and validate what does in spite of skimpy evidence.
Rationalization is uncanny in the way it works. I recall a study that was done in the 60s on patients that had suffered injuries that severed the connection between the hemispheres of their brains. They put a patch over the right eye (or the left - I can't recall enough about left/right brain functions). Then during an interview, the doctor holds up a card that says "go into the break room and get a coke and come back". Then the patient does just that and comes back sipping the coke. The doctor says why did you go get that drink. The patient shrugs and says "I was thirsty!". The point is that for perhaps even most of what we do in life, you do it, then you "figure out" why you did it. The reason that you rationalize may have very little to do with the real reason.
So when you read a study and find it to be a open invitation to eat whatever you want to and quit monitoring your weight, remember there's a lazy emotional creature inside of you that is not only simply waiting for news like that, this creature is ready to actively distort reality to get what she wants.
Last edited by Walter S; 03-30-15 at 03:25 PM.
#222
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
Very good advice. Conserving your output of energy is instinctual behavior. I think that in the modern world, those are instincts that work against us. With the technology and infrastructure we have today, most people are subject to new threats to health because in evolutionary time scales, we've only recently found it possible to conserve so much energy. Now, the natural conversion of excess calories into fat, can work against us. It was never so practical to become so fat on the prairie in ancient Africa. So evolution had little challenge to actively prevent it.
I have less concern for the actual fat content in my body. Being active is IMO more important. But if you're active enough, you won't be very fat.
Excess weight also works on your joints. If I gain ten pounds it makes me feel sluggish and heavy. Watch out. That's just the kind of feeling that makes one want to throw in the towel and grab another slice of pizza (made with refined flour that will have you hungry again in a little while).
The instinct to conserve energy has become the instinct to be lazy. Watch out because your power to rationalize what you want to do as "good for you" or at least "ok" is strong! If there's one thing humans are good at, it is rationalization. We all have a hearty power to ignore what doesn't fit and validate what does in spite of skimpy evidence.
Rationalization is uncanny in the way it works. I recall a study that was done in the 60s on patients that had suffered injuries that severed the connection between the hemispheres of their brains. They put a patch over the right eye (or the left - I can't recall enough about left/right brain functions). Then during an interview, the doctor holds up a card that says "go into the break room and get a coke and come back". Then the patient does just that and comes back sipping the coke. The doctor says why did you go get that drink. The patient shrugs and says "I was thirsty!". The point is that for perhaps even most of what we do in life, you do it, then you "figure out" why you did it. The reason that you rationalize may have very little to do with the real reason.
So when you read a study and find it to be a open invitation to eat whatever you want to and quit monitoring your weight, remember there's a lazy emotional creature inside of you that is not only simply waiting for news like that, this creature is ready to actively distort reality to get what she wants.
I have less concern for the actual fat content in my body. Being active is IMO more important. But if you're active enough, you won't be very fat.
Excess weight also works on your joints. If I gain ten pounds it makes me feel sluggish and heavy. Watch out. That's just the kind of feeling that makes one want to throw in the towel and grab another slice of pizza (made with refined flour that will have you hungry again in a little while).
The instinct to conserve energy has become the instinct to be lazy. Watch out because your power to rationalize what you want to do as "good for you" or at least "ok" is strong! If there's one thing humans are good at, it is rationalization. We all have a hearty power to ignore what doesn't fit and validate what does in spite of skimpy evidence.
Rationalization is uncanny in the way it works. I recall a study that was done in the 60s on patients that had suffered injuries that severed the connection between the hemispheres of their brains. They put a patch over the right eye (or the left - I can't recall enough about left/right brain functions). Then during an interview, the doctor holds up a card that says "go into the break room and get a coke and come back". Then the patient does just that and comes back sipping the coke. The doctor says why did you go get that drink. The patient shrugs and says "I was thirsty!". The point is that for perhaps even most of what we do in life, you do it, then you "figure out" why you did it. The reason that you rationalize may have very little to do with the real reason.
So when you read a study and find it to be a open invitation to eat whatever you want to and quit monitoring your weight, remember there's a lazy emotional creature inside of you that is not only simply waiting for news like that, this creature is ready to actively distort reality to get what she wants.
Rather, they conclude that their findings should be used as one piece of evidence by policy makers who are trying to get the most bang out of the public health care buck. It might not make sense to spend millions of dollars on weight loss programs if a) the programs almost never result in significant weight loss and b) even when weight loss does occur, the cost benefit is less than it would be for other prevention strategies.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#223
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1015 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I hope I'm not stretching this out too long, but I want to point out that the authors of the scholarly article did not conclude that uncontrolled eating should be recommended, even if that's your personal take-away.
Rather, they conclude that their findings should be used as one piece of evidence by policy makers who are trying to get the most bang out of the public health care buck. It might not make sense to spend millions of dollars on weight loss programs if a) the programs almost never result in significant weight loss and b) even when weight loss does occur, the cost benefit is less than it would be for other prevention strategies.
Rather, they conclude that their findings should be used as one piece of evidence by policy makers who are trying to get the most bang out of the public health care buck. It might not make sense to spend millions of dollars on weight loss programs if a) the programs almost never result in significant weight loss and b) even when weight loss does occur, the cost benefit is less than it would be for other prevention strategies.
I lost 40 pounds by going from a sometimes-rider to a every-day rider. That was 1997 and I've kept that off by keeping up the activity level. Everybody has to find the balance that works for them personally. I'm glad I found the right thing for me. I look in the mirror and see somebody that I can respect. And he's not bad looking either.
#224
Author Guy
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: 2012 Roubaix Pro, 2011 Roubaix Expert, 2006 Tarmac S-Works
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My problem is I eat out of boredom, snacking while watching TV shows/movies. Once I started riding regularly (daily-weather permitting) I lost 73 lbs over a period of about a year and a half (18 of those twice). I'm still chunky, or as I like to say, pleasingly plump, but I'm not terribly worried about losing another 40 lbs. Some people don't look good skinny. I'm hefty but carry the weight well, not being obese. Still working on it, tho.
2015 (Apr 3): 977 Miles—70 Days—41 hrs ♂ Weekly Avg: 96
2013 to Present: 5,650 Miles—391 Days—481 Hrs
Compromise means I'll get my way and you'll find a way to be okay with that.
Last edited by Greybeard712; 04-07-15 at 06:11 AM.
#225
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 21
Bikes: 21 Speed Custom Huffy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i did the pacific highway tour years ago from Portland to LA and i went from 360LB down to 270LB and then 270LB down to 210LB on the way back to Portland. iv packed on the weight since then and im now like 290. my current plan is to restore the bike i have now and then bike like 126 miles a week to and from work so hopefully will lose some weight.