Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

90s MTB sizing?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

90s MTB sizing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-17 | 10:05 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 289
Likes: 19

Bikes: Masi Giramondo, Trek 830 monstercross build, Raleigh Gran Sport, Lemond Tourmalet

90s MTB sizing?

I understand how sizing on road/cross/gravel bikes works, but when it comes to mountain bikes of any era, I do not. It seems like the larger frames tend to be smaller than larger frames for other types of bikes based on what I can find for sale. It's relatively easy to find old 58-62cm road/cross frames, but I don't feel like it's at all easy to find old 24in mountain frames, plus it seems from looking at BikePedia that few frames went beyond about 21 or 22 inches, so I really feel like I'm missing some important piece of information here. Did no tall guys buy mountain bikes in the 1990s? Please help me understand this. Also, if it helps I am almost 6-1.
bcpriess is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-17 | 11:47 PM
  #2  
mstateglfr's Avatar
Sunshine
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 18,702
Likes: 10,237
From: Des Moines, IA

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

At 6-1 you almost for sure dont need a 22" frame with level top tube.
I am 6'5 and have a 22" frame with a very slight sloped top tube and its plenty big.

Mountain bikes should have more crotch clearance than road bikes. Easier to dismount during a short climb you cant complete or anything else where you need to get a foot down orndismount quickly.
This smaller frame is offset with s top tube which will be long for the frane size when compared to level tube road bikes.

Also, mountain bikes have a higher bottom bracket. This means you are starting out higher up vs a road bike.
Seat posts are now 350-400mm for a reason- mountain bike sizing means more exposed seatpost compared to traditional road bike geometry.
mstateglfr is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-17 | 07:56 AM
  #3  
Kapusta's Avatar
Advanced Slacker
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 2,602

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Originally Posted by bcpriess
I understand how sizing on road/cross/gravel bikes works, but when it comes to mountain bikes of any era, I do not. It seems like the larger frames tend to be smaller than larger frames for other types of bikes based on what I can find for sale. It's relatively easy to find old 58-62cm road/cross frames, but I don't feel like it's at all easy to find old 24in mountain frames, plus it seems from looking at BikePedia that few frames went beyond about 21 or 22 inches, so I really feel like I'm missing some important piece of information here. Did no tall guys buy mountain bikes in the 1990s? Please help me understand this. Also, if it helps I am almost 6-1.
Just to echo what was said above....

MTBs of any era have lower top tubes and thus shorter seat tubes than road bikes. So someone who rides a 52cm (~20.5") road bike might end up on a 17" MTB.

At 6'-1" I think it unlikely you would want anything bigger than 21" and some people your height would ride even smaller, depending on the particular frame and their body proportions.

FWIW, seat tube length has never been a very good way to size mtbs (though it took a few decades for people to catch on to this). Effective top tube length (or reach/stack, if you know it) is a much better indicator of frame fit. I have ended up on everything from 16" - 19" mtb frames for proper fit and handling.
Kapusta is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-17 | 05:33 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Likes: 10
My road bike is 54-55 cm.

On my 29er, I ride a 17". On my old 90s MTB, I rode a 17.5".

As a rule, you size down from a road bike when buying an MTB.
NormanF is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-17 | 11:15 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 914
Likes: 61
From: Sunny so. cal.
My steel 1991 Fisher Paragon is a 19 and I'm 6-1, 32 inseam. I now ride a Kona Hei Hei size Large for comparison. I rode a 58 Bianchi Virata at the same time.
bikeme is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WGB
Mountain Biking
6
11-14-17 01:41 PM
icepick_trotsky
Commuting
4
11-19-14 03:52 AM
trek330
Fifty Plus (50+)
11
09-21-11 06:32 PM
clydeosaur
Mountain Biking
17
05-01-10 03:47 PM
kroozer
Mountain Biking
9
02-21-10 01:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.