v brakes
#4
B*ck From Th* D**d
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 8
From: Lower Mainland, BC
Bikes: 2015 Kona Process 153
There is hydro V brakes. I am just wondering but V-brakes are just the pads. Right?
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA
Bikes: Stumpjumper FSR 30th Anniversary
Originally Posted by Svr
The XTR/XT parallel push brakes just have too much complex linkage for long term reliability.

As with anything, if you want something to last, take care of it, and keep it clean and lubed, and it will take care of you.
#7
Originally Posted by mtb-chop
Bull - I got a set of XT V's when they first came out in '96 - still going strong, on my wife's bike now. They stop pretty darn well - any stronger words would get ****'s out. 

#10
Thread Starter
cptn. x-chains sidekick
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
Bikes: stumpie, xtr, sid, ultimate sd
yeh, i just got some speed dial ti's so im not interested in hydro'z ...
im actually thinking xtr or ultimates... btw these brakes would replace my current shimano xt canti's... i figure running cantis rite now is okay considering my area is muddy as all hell...
im actually thinking xtr or ultimates... btw these brakes would replace my current shimano xt canti's... i figure running cantis rite now is okay considering my area is muddy as all hell...
#11
(Grouchy)

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,643
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Jason222
Magura hydraulic V brakes.
the other issue that i've run into, is that if you're running a manitou fork, the stabilizers posts for the brakes don't have anything to rest against (due to the backwards arch). you don't want them against the stanchions because they'll rub and mar and scratch it. i think even a fork with a normal arch you'd have issues with the calipers being too close to the tire.
my front brakes are only supported by the V-studs and the brake arch, which makes me a little nervous. so...again, i think i'm going to go with avid V-brakes up front.
i don't want to get rid of my maguras, but V's will be much easier to work with, and will probably reduce the weight of my bike by about a pound.
#12
DEADBEEF

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,234
Likes: 10
From: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
I don't think Maguras rim brakes can be called "V-brakes" as V-brakes are a subset of linear pull cable-actuated cantilever brakes. Maguras are hydraulic rim brakes. And yes, they're quite powerful as others have attested. I've even heard stories of them crushing some rims. As far as good cable-actuated cantilever-type brakes go, my vote goes to Avid. I'm running Avid ArchRival 50s and they provide plenty of stopping power. The SD series are also quite good.
BTW, anyone remember the Pederson SE (self-energising) cantilever brakes?
BTW, anyone remember the Pederson SE (self-energising) cantilever brakes?
__________________
1999 K2 OzM
2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM
2001 Aegis Aro Svelte"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#13
Too Much Crazy
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 3
From: NY
Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9
Originally Posted by gmoneyhobbit
yeh, i just got some speed dial ti's so im not interested in hydro'z ...
im actually thinking xtr or ultimates... btw these brakes would replace my current shimano xt canti's... i figure running cantis rite now is okay considering my area is muddy as all hell...
im actually thinking xtr or ultimates... btw these brakes would replace my current shimano xt canti's... i figure running cantis rite now is okay considering my area is muddy as all hell...





