Ss Mtb
#1
Hey.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yankee in the south.
Posts: 283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ss Mtb
QUESTION =-)
I'm seriously considering getting a Redline Monocog (although I would love to have a On-One Inbred or Bianchi MUSS--but the price is a bit steep). Alright, so, I don't think the 16t freewheel will be the best setup for me, I'd like something faster to go over roots, small rocks, soft dirt, maybe climbing a bit, etc. SO, would putting a 20t or 22t freewheel work? I do know of the double freewheel but the biggest that goes up to it 17-19 I believe, I don't if that would be fast enough. Hm.
Right now I have a Raleigh M20 (rigid fork) and I use like two speeds ever on that thing (a pretty fast speed for going over stuff and climbing and a slower speed for flatter areas--all trails) so that's why I really want to get a SS MTB.
I'm seriously considering getting a Redline Monocog (although I would love to have a On-One Inbred or Bianchi MUSS--but the price is a bit steep). Alright, so, I don't think the 16t freewheel will be the best setup for me, I'd like something faster to go over roots, small rocks, soft dirt, maybe climbing a bit, etc. SO, would putting a 20t or 22t freewheel work? I do know of the double freewheel but the biggest that goes up to it 17-19 I believe, I don't if that would be fast enough. Hm.
Right now I have a Raleigh M20 (rigid fork) and I use like two speeds ever on that thing (a pretty fast speed for going over stuff and climbing and a slower speed for flatter areas--all trails) so that's why I really want to get a SS MTB.
#2
Custom User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: T0L0K0
Posts: 3,739
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So you want to run a 32x20/22 instead of a 32x16? I think that'd be a useless gear unless you are riding up hills all of the time. You'd be spinning pretty fast and wouldn't be able to maintain much speed in most situations.
You can always get the bike and ride it then decide if you think you need a lower gear. Or just ride your current bike on a trail in your 32x16 gear and see how it goes. It will be a little tougher at first but you will get used to it and may want a larger chainring or a smaller cog out back.
You can always get the bike and ride it then decide if you think you need a lower gear. Or just ride your current bike on a trail in your 32x16 gear and see how it goes. It will be a little tougher at first but you will get used to it and may want a larger chainring or a smaller cog out back.
#4
Hey.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yankee in the south.
Posts: 283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Reading some reviews on mtbr.com for the monocog, I see that people who wanted a better climb are using a 32/18 setup, I probably try that.
#5
Hey.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yankee in the south.
Posts: 283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Could I just put a 7-speed cassette on it? The new Monocogs have 135mm spacing in the back so I would think I could.
Also, I've heard that disc brakes on the back of a SS can be a bad thing. Is this true? I see a lot SS with disc brakes, too.
Also, I've heard that disc brakes on the back of a SS can be a bad thing. Is this true? I see a lot SS with disc brakes, too.
#6
Too Much Crazy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660
Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by BodiesOfLight
Could I just put a 7-speed cassette on it? The new Monocogs have 135mm spacing in the back so I would think I could.
Originally Posted by BodiesOfLight
Also, I've heard that disc brakes on the back of a SS can be a bad thing. Is this true? I see a lot SS with disc brakes, too.
If you are a tall lad also, check out the monocog 29er.
#7
eert a ekil yzarc
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pasadena TX
Posts: 2,560
Bikes: many bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In regards to the original question on gearing... What do you mean by faster gearing? The directsion you were going sounds like your going more granny geared. 32X20 (assuming your keeping the front chainwheel) will make you spin a lot more. Great for climbs, bad for flat outs. But with all that is Single Speed, its is all to the individuals preferences.
And for disc brakes on SS setups. To remove the rear wheel off my 1x1, I have to remove the rear caliper first. I think that if I were to run bigger brakes, I wouldn't have this issue.
And for disc brakes on SS setups. To remove the rear wheel off my 1x1, I have to remove the rear caliper first. I think that if I were to run bigger brakes, I wouldn't have this issue.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cambridge, MN
Posts: 75
Bikes: Surly Crosscheck, Haro Mary, Redline Monocog, Trek 930
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have disc up front, so easy to change things around in back. Mine came with 16 tooth, and have been able to put up to a 20 tooth in back without adding links. 20 tooth is nice for elevation gain, or short steep climbs, but spins out way too fast if you have any flats. Also with a 20 tooth if you don't add links, you won't get as large a tire in back. my .02