Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Hardtail or Full Suspension?

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Hardtail or Full Suspension?

Reply

Old 06-06-06, 06:37 PM
  #1  
Petanca
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 43
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hardtail or Full Suspension?

I can't decide... I was looking towards the Kikapu and the Dawg for FS but I saw the Caldera and it looks a a pretty sweet Hardtail. I'm plannign to ride them on XC trails and take them off some small jumps. Could someone please lay out for me the disadvatges and adavantages of Hardtail and Full Suspension? Also which one would you reccomend?
Thanks
Petanca is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-06, 06:58 PM
  #2  
mtnbiker66
Old School Rad
 
mtnbiker66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The old Mountains
Posts: 8,212

Bikes: Blur LT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't really know. A little help here please.
__________________
Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......
mtnbiker66 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-06, 07:25 PM
  #3  
pinkrobe
DNPAIMFB
 
pinkrobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Posts: 4,654

Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
XC trails and some sweet jumps - if you're not climbi9ng big hills - SS hardtail 4 teh win. Also, there's a gazillion threads started on this exact topic already, so search...
__________________
Proud Member of the HHCMF
'06 Cervelo Soloist Carbon | '09 Titus El Guapo | '09 Misfit diSSent | '09 Wabi Lightning
pinkrobe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-06, 07:35 PM
  #4  
Flak
Flatland hack
 
Flak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nowhere near the mountains :/
Posts: 3,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think if you're in the dawg price range for a FS, you could do alot better than the caldara for a HT.

I personally dont like the Konas all that much. You get less for your dollar with them i think.
__________________
My shop - www.spinbikeshop.com
My team - www.teampanther.com
Flak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-06, 09:04 PM
  #5  
WannaGetGood
B*ck From Th* D**d
 
WannaGetGood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 2,479

Bikes: 2015 Kona Process 153

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
If you have the money I would go with the FS. Just a nicer ride.
WannaGetGood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-06, 09:12 PM
  #6  
mx_599
Lost in the Black Hills
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Petanca
I can't decide... I was looking towards the Kikapu and the Dawg for FS but I saw the Caldera and it looks a a pretty sweet Hardtail. I'm plannign to ride them on XC trails and take them off some small jumps. Could someone please lay out for me the disadvatges and adavantages of Hardtail and Full Suspension? Also which one would you reccomend?
Thanks
my opinion, a sweet free ride hard tail unless you have access to ski mountain type places
mx_599 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-06, 09:24 PM
  #7  
mcoine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: southern oregon
Posts: 2,631
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
At the same price a hardtail will offer better components, and less weight. For xc riding a hardtail will be your best bet. I include small jumps and drops (3-5 feet), and downhill sections in the "xc" category, unlike some riders. To me, xc = pretty much anything you might find. It is certainly a good place to start if you are new to the sport.
mcoine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-06, 04:52 PM
  #8  
justwitheraway
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hardtails are lighter.
justwitheraway is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-06, 06:04 PM
  #9  
nm+
Ultra-clydesdale
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA or St Paul, MN
Posts: 572

Bikes: Titus Racer-X AL/Trek 520(RIP)/Trek 930

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Originally Posted by justwitheraway
Hardtails are lighter.
And fs can be more fun.
My RX is also the best climbing bike I've ever owned. For 99% of trails, I'm sold on FS. However, I wouldn't sacrafice componetry, I don't think I'd go FS with less than an XT (maybe LX with a good shock and fork) kit.
Also, an FS bike is a much harder thing to buy than a hardtail. I'd want to ride an FS bike before I bought it. Each design reacts to riding style and terrain.
A hardtail is more about geometry, while an FS is engineering and much harder to screw up.
nm+ is offline  
Reply With Quote

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service