Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Kona or Rocky Mountain

Old 02-03-03, 07:43 AM
  #1  
Sterling
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Kona or Rocky Mountain

I am going to buy a new mountain bike soon and have narrowed my choices down to;

2003 Kona Blast
2003 Rocky mountain Fusion

Does any one have any experience with these bikes? Any thoughts or suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks
Sterling is offline  
Old 02-03-03, 08:08 AM
  #2  
KrisA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Regina, SK, CA
Posts: 945

Bikes: 2002 Rocky HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I doubt you can go wrong with either of them. The Kona has a better fork, the Rocky (likely) has a better frame. I say likely because the 2003 Fusion and Trailhead are no longer hand welded in the BC factory. They come to Rocky from overseas, and are then inspected and painted at the Rocky factory. Also these two models no longer use Easton Aluminium.

Try them both and see which one you like better. Me, I'm biased, I'd go with the Rocky.

Kris
2002 RM Trailhead

PS - do you have the Rocky CD? If not ask your LBS for it, it might help you make up your mind. Even if it doesn't, it's fun to watch!
KrisA is offline  
Old 02-03-03, 10:54 AM
  #3  
TotalKos
Senior Member
 
TotalKos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the T-Dot
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
KONA (they rock)
TotalKos is offline  
Old 02-03-03, 11:50 AM
  #4  
math2p14
Part of the furniture
 
math2p14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Exeter UK, Athens Greece.
Posts: 930

Bikes: Specialized RH, Scott Unitrack

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would go for kona. RMs are pretty overspriced due to the handbuilt in canada hype they bare. plus lowend RMs dont have their decals coated so soon you ll loose them ...personally i am a specialized fan but i like Kona....real mtbs.
math2p14 is offline  
Old 02-03-03, 12:03 PM
  #5  
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Both basically the same. I don't like RM decals and prefer Kona as a compan so I go with Kona...But really you won't loose with either. test ride them and see which you prefer...

A Krisa thanks for the heads up. I hadn't heard anything about that
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 02-03-03, 12:27 PM
  #6  
KrisA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Regina, SK, CA
Posts: 945

Bikes: 2002 Rocky HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just a follow up to the end of the "hand built" low end Rockies. Using the RM Custom 7005 tubing and the computer welds allows the 2003 TH and Fusion to have better forks than last years models for the same price. Inspect the welds vs the hand built models, you can cleary see that the computer welds are much more "polished" whild also having a definate point where the final weld was made. Supposedly they still put the fully welded frame in a jig to see if it is straight. If it is not they trash it. If the Kona frame is not straight they heat it to bend it straight.

To me the build of the Rocky is worth the extra $. I shopped the 2002 Trailhead against the 2003 Kona Nunu. While the Nuno has higher end shifters/derailers, fork, and brakes I still went with the Rocky. Why?

1) Weight - the Rocky felt much lighter, despite having the pig Judy TT fork.
2) Build quality - the look/feel of the rocky was in another league
3) Brakes - while the Nunu's disks looked cool, the feel sucked and I don't intend on doing enough down hill runs to worry about superheating my brakes.

As far as the decals go, I personally don't want to be stuck with the factory decal package forever. I like the idea that I can change it if I want to.

What's an extra couple of bucks for a better made bike that you will likely have for many years to come?
KrisA is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrfizzed
Road Cycling
12
10-25-10 09:38 AM
Cayman
Road Cycling
4
02-13-06 10:16 PM
cryogenic
General Cycling Discussion
27
05-14-05 06:50 PM
a2psyklnut
Mountain Biking
21
09-09-03 07:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.