Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Tubeless - Pros and Cons

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Tubeless - Pros and Cons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-06, 05:43 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tubeless - Pros and Cons

Hello,
After having my 3rd pinch flat in 3 weeks I'm thinking of going tubeless. Tires are Hutchinson Pythons around Mavic 317 wheelset. What are the pros and cons of going tubeless? Are my tires and wheels compatible with this or do I have buy new tires and wheels?

I appreciate any insight anyone can provide here. Thanks!
dfioc is offline  
Old 11-02-06, 05:49 PM
  #2  
later
 
free_pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,471
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by dfioc
Tires are Hutchinson Pythons around Mavic 317 wheelset. What are the pros and cons of going tubeless? Are my tires and wheels compatible with this or do I have buy new tires and wheels?
Unless you are going to use a product like (or similar) to stans no-tubes, your rims are not compatible to be running tubeless. You can use tubeless tires with the rims, but you still need a tube

Check your pythons, does it say tubeless anywhere on them?

ive heard stans are a pain in the ass to set up, but thats only what ive heard. read about them yourself here: https://www.notubes.com/

you also might want to check out olivers yes tubes here: https://www.yestubes.com/
free_pizza is offline  
Old 11-02-06, 08:31 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
santiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 4,510

Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C-V
Tubeless is lighter weight, for obvious reasons.
Not necessarily. The additional special rim strip and the guck weighs just as much as a tube. The main benefit is the ability to run lower tire pressures.
santiago is offline  
Old 11-02-06, 08:50 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was running 40-45 PSI until my first pinch flat. I increased to 50 and have the same problem. My area has a lot of sharp rocks which is causing the flats.

Anyone have any experience with the Stans tubeless system? Good? Bad?
dfioc is offline  
Old 11-02-06, 09:10 PM
  #5  
you can go backwards?!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 390
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by R. Danneskjöld
Here's one of my experiences with Stan's:

Shoulda used Oliver's YesTubes.
wompwomp is offline  
Old 11-02-06, 09:11 PM
  #6  
*********
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 66

Bikes: 2003 Trek 1000, 2004 Diamondback XSL

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have the same tires and (i think) same rims. The tire rolls really fast on pavement, grass, etc. Good traction too. Putting the tires on is a HUUUUUGE pain in the ass, worse than any roadbike tire I've ever put on. Recommended pressure for those tires is between 30 and 60 psi. You can run them even lower for awesome traction, but too much sidewall flex during cornering.
PiratePete is offline  
Old 11-02-06, 09:20 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
santiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 4,510

Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by R. Danneskjöld
I always have.
At $50 a set, you got ripped off.
santiago is offline  
Old 11-02-06, 09:29 PM
  #8  
what? Not me...
 
Dan Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Costa Mesa, Ca
Posts: 87

Bikes: Mt. Bike, Intense tracer; Road, Specialzed Roubaix Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dfioc
Hello,
After having my 3rd pinch flat in 3 weeks I'm thinking of going tubeless. Tires are Hutchinson Pythons around Mavic 317 wheelset. What are the pros and cons of going tubeless? Are my tires and wheels compatible with this or do I have buy new tires and wheels?

I appreciate any insight anyone can provide here. Thanks!

I think with a stans No-tubes kit you can go tubeless.
Since I went tubelss 2 YEARS ago, have not had 1 flat.
I use to get a flat every 80 miles or so, and tubes started to add up.
I have used a couple of CO2 cartridges to fill tube tires for riding companions, more because I didn't want to wait for them to pump than just being nice
Go tubless you'll never go back!!!!!
Dan Drew is offline  
Old 11-02-06, 10:02 PM
  #9  
you can go backwards?!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 390
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by R. Danneskjöld
QUICK! DUCK!

Something just flew over your head (once again)!

wompwomp is offline  
Old 11-03-06, 12:03 AM
  #10  
mmm babaghanouj.
 
rasheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: toronto, canada.
Posts: 848

Bikes: 2003 norco fluid 3.0, 2016 Intense Tracer 275C Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C-V
MobyGames...the definitive source for PC Games?
right click on picture ... properties ... copy & paste url into browser ...

rasheed is offline  
Old 11-03-06, 07:41 PM
  #11  
you can go backwards?!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 390
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wompwomp is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 09:09 AM
  #12  
as seen on crimewatch
 
rea1high's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
found this. thought it might help

https://www.justridingalong.co.uk/content.php?pid=529

https://www.justridingalong.co.uk/excel_reader/page.php

https://www.notubes.com/support_selecting.php
rea1high is offline  
Old 11-06-06, 06:41 PM
  #13  
Taking "s" outta "Fast"
 
AfterThisNap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zoo York City
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I switched to Stan's a few months ago and i think the system rocks pretty hard. I had two pinchflats on one ride earlier in Sept. I did the same trail last week, rode just as crappily (if not worse because of the low light), and didn't flat despite whanging my rear wheel sloppily into some square edged rocks that would definitely have taken out a normal tube.
I don't get normal puncture flats either.
They were, in fact, a total PITA to set up though, and at first I couldn't get the front to hold air for more than a week. After some practice I have it down though.
You may want to go UST and use stan's goop in the inside. Best of both worlds , easier to set up for newbies, near flat-proofness from the goop.
AfterThisNap is offline  
Old 11-06-06, 09:47 PM
  #14  
Lost in the Black Hills
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by santiago
Not necessarily. The additional special rim strip and the guck weighs just as much as a tube. The main benefit is the ability to run lower tire pressures.
so do you or don't you save rotational weight with them? stan's would have you believe you do. i was thinking about trying tubeless, but if the only benefit is allowing you a broader spectrum of pressures than i am not as interested.

i was under the impression you saved a lot of weight.

i guess not?
mx_599 is offline  
Old 11-06-06, 10:12 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
santiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 4,510

Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mx_599
so do you or don't you save rotational weight with them? stan's would have you believe you do. i was thinking about trying tubeless, but if the only benefit is allowing you a broader spectrum of pressures than i am not as interested.

i was under the impression you saved a lot of weight.

i guess not?
Depends on if you're going UST or just using the Stan's system on traditional tires. From what I understand UST tires are heavier than their equivalent standard tires. I did a quick check on the Schwalbe site and found the Nobby Nics I have are listed at 495g for the 26x2.1" in standard and weigh 710g for the same UST tire. I don't know if all tires are that way. I am actually surprised by the weight difference

If you go with the Stan's system on standard rims with standard tires you obviously have the same weight tires but you have to run the strips and add the slime. Not sure what that weighs but I understood it to be comparable to what a tube weighs. This is what my wheel builder explained to me.
santiago is offline  
Old 11-07-06, 12:07 AM
  #16  
Lost in the Black Hills
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by santiago
Depends on if you're going UST or just using the Stan's system on traditional tires. From what I understand UST tires are heavier than their equivalent standard tires. I did a quick check on the Schwalbe site and found the Nobby Nics I have are listed at 495g for the 26x2.1" in standard and weigh 710g for the same UST tire. I don't know if all tires are that way. I am actually surprised by the weight difference

If you go with the Stan's system on standard rims with standard tires you obviously have the same weight tires but you have to run the strips and add the slime. Not sure what that weighs but I understood it to be comparable to what a tube weighs. This is what my wheel builder explained to me.
that weight difference in tire types alone is enough to make me not bother with tubelessness.

i have seen total mixed reviews of slime. so i hesitantly pose the question again. have any of you had what you believe to be any success with Slime in a regular tube?

thanks
mx_599 is offline  
Old 11-07-06, 04:38 AM
  #17  
Official Website Waterboy
 
born2bahick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,271

Bikes: a lot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tubeless tire are heavier because of a stiffer sidewall and a sealing layer, My Epic was converted to UST, after it was all done I bet there isn't ten grams difference per wheel. Running standard tires, (Which are lighter) tubeless with a little extra sealant to seal the tire and make it airtight can save some weight over a standard tube or UST setup, but I wouldn't reccomend it for heavy riders, For me the big gains in going tubeless is that I never flat anymore, and I have less rolling resistance, even at lower pressure for some reason.
born2bahick is offline  
Old 11-07-06, 08:56 AM
  #18  
Lost in the Black Hills
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks guys. i only weigh 130-140, but it still is not sounding worth it to me.
mx_599 is offline  
Old 11-07-06, 08:00 PM
  #19  
mmm... chicken!
 
Funkychicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 668

Bikes: 04 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my experience with stan's has been positive. lost some weight but mainly due to folding bead tyres instead of wire beaded ones, weight loss was not particularly significant unless you're being a weight weenie? anyways, pinch flats have been a worry of the past, but i have yet to add extra sealant in the tyre which may pose a problem. only real difficulty with initial setup was the availability of a compressor, but once you have that, follow instructions carefully and setup was a breeze first time.
Funkychicken is offline  
Old 11-07-06, 08:44 PM
  #20  
Just shy of 400W
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 766

Bikes: Cannondale System 6, Klein Palomino

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Literally, the ONLY reason to go tubeless is to be able to run lower pressures. They wont be lighter. I run tubeless now, and I love it. I can run 25 psi and have no problems, which I do on a regular basis.
__________________
2008 Cannondale System Six
2016 Pivot Mach 5.5


ranger5oh is offline  
Old 11-07-06, 09:08 PM
  #21  
Member
 
Hattori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I like tubeless too but haven't done it for weight reasons either.
Hattori is offline  
Old 11-07-06, 10:59 PM
  #22  
Taking "s" outta "Fast"
 
AfterThisNap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zoo York City
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh, I forgot. I weighed both my wheels and complete bike before and after, and lost more than 1/2 lb after the Stan's conversion using the same tire/wheel combo (mavic 317s and specialized adrenaline pros). So, yea, booyah.

p.s. I was using normal non DH tubes prior.
AfterThisNap is offline  
Old 11-08-06, 06:47 AM
  #23  
Official Website Waterboy
 
born2bahick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,271

Bikes: a lot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just another reason I like the setup, pulled the hardtail down yesterday for a ride notice the front tire was a little soft, just rode it sunday, anyways aired it up and went riding. when I got home I wanted to make a few adjustments so I put it in the stand and while it was there I looked at that front tire and found a thorn, grabbed some pliers , pulled it out, ssssss rotated the tire so the stan's could do it's thing.
next time around all was quiet, the only eveidence of the hole was a small milky bead of sealant.
born2bahick is offline  
Old 11-08-06, 09:19 AM
  #24  
Taking "s" outta "Fast"
 
AfterThisNap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zoo York City
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yea, I love it when that happens.
When I first installed it at the shop we tested the system out by going at it like serial killers with sharpend spokes and pens. It was awesome.
AfterThisNap is offline  
Old 11-08-06, 10:09 AM
  #25  
Official Website Waterboy
 
born2bahick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,271

Bikes: a lot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AfterThisNap
Yea, I love it when that happens.
When I first installed it at the shop we tested the system out by going at it like serial killers with sharpend spokes and pens. It was awesome.
That's awesome!!!! I have got to go riding with you sometime!
born2bahick is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.