Tubeless - Pros and Cons
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tubeless - Pros and Cons
Hello,
After having my 3rd pinch flat in 3 weeks I'm thinking of going tubeless. Tires are Hutchinson Pythons around Mavic 317 wheelset. What are the pros and cons of going tubeless? Are my tires and wheels compatible with this or do I have buy new tires and wheels?
I appreciate any insight anyone can provide here. Thanks!
After having my 3rd pinch flat in 3 weeks I'm thinking of going tubeless. Tires are Hutchinson Pythons around Mavic 317 wheelset. What are the pros and cons of going tubeless? Are my tires and wheels compatible with this or do I have buy new tires and wheels?
I appreciate any insight anyone can provide here. Thanks!
#2
later
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,471
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by dfioc
Tires are Hutchinson Pythons around Mavic 317 wheelset. What are the pros and cons of going tubeless? Are my tires and wheels compatible with this or do I have buy new tires and wheels?
Check your pythons, does it say tubeless anywhere on them?
ive heard stans are a pain in the ass to set up, but thats only what ive heard. read about them yourself here: https://www.notubes.com/
you also might want to check out olivers yes tubes here: https://www.yestubes.com/
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 4,510
Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by C-V
Tubeless is lighter weight, for obvious reasons.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was running 40-45 PSI until my first pinch flat. I increased to 50 and have the same problem. My area has a lot of sharp rocks which is causing the flats.
Anyone have any experience with the Stans tubeless system? Good? Bad?
Anyone have any experience with the Stans tubeless system? Good? Bad?
#6
*********
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 66
Bikes: 2003 Trek 1000, 2004 Diamondback XSL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have the same tires and (i think) same rims. The tire rolls really fast on pavement, grass, etc. Good traction too. Putting the tires on is a HUUUUUGE pain in the ass, worse than any roadbike tire I've ever put on. Recommended pressure for those tires is between 30 and 60 psi. You can run them even lower for awesome traction, but too much sidewall flex during cornering.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 4,510
Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by R. Danneskjöld
I always have.
#8
what? Not me...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Costa Mesa, Ca
Posts: 87
Bikes: Mt. Bike, Intense tracer; Road, Specialzed Roubaix Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dfioc
Hello,
After having my 3rd pinch flat in 3 weeks I'm thinking of going tubeless. Tires are Hutchinson Pythons around Mavic 317 wheelset. What are the pros and cons of going tubeless? Are my tires and wheels compatible with this or do I have buy new tires and wheels?
I appreciate any insight anyone can provide here. Thanks!
After having my 3rd pinch flat in 3 weeks I'm thinking of going tubeless. Tires are Hutchinson Pythons around Mavic 317 wheelset. What are the pros and cons of going tubeless? Are my tires and wheels compatible with this or do I have buy new tires and wheels?
I appreciate any insight anyone can provide here. Thanks!
I think with a stans No-tubes kit you can go tubeless.
Since I went tubelss 2 YEARS ago, have not had 1 flat.
I use to get a flat every 80 miles or so, and tubes started to add up.
I have used a couple of CO2 cartridges to fill tube tires for riding companions, more because I didn't want to wait for them to pump than just being nice
Go tubless you'll never go back!!!!!
#10
mmm babaghanouj.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: toronto, canada.
Posts: 848
Bikes: 2003 norco fluid 3.0, 2016 Intense Tracer 275C Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by C-V
MobyGames...the definitive source for PC Games?
#12
as seen on crimewatch
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Taking "s" outta "Fast"
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zoo York City
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I switched to Stan's a few months ago and i think the system rocks pretty hard. I had two pinchflats on one ride earlier in Sept. I did the same trail last week, rode just as crappily (if not worse because of the low light), and didn't flat despite whanging my rear wheel sloppily into some square edged rocks that would definitely have taken out a normal tube.
I don't get normal puncture flats either.
They were, in fact, a total PITA to set up though, and at first I couldn't get the front to hold air for more than a week. After some practice I have it down though.
You may want to go UST and use stan's goop in the inside. Best of both worlds , easier to set up for newbies, near flat-proofness from the goop.
I don't get normal puncture flats either.
They were, in fact, a total PITA to set up though, and at first I couldn't get the front to hold air for more than a week. After some practice I have it down though.
You may want to go UST and use stan's goop in the inside. Best of both worlds , easier to set up for newbies, near flat-proofness from the goop.
#14
Lost in the Black Hills
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by santiago
Not necessarily. The additional special rim strip and the guck weighs just as much as a tube. The main benefit is the ability to run lower tire pressures.
i was under the impression you saved a lot of weight.
i guess not?
__________________
Tomac Mountain Bikes | Light-Bikes l Magura USA | Industry Nine | Schwalbe Tires | Caffélatex
Tomac Mountain Bikes | Light-Bikes l Magura USA | Industry Nine | Schwalbe Tires | Caffélatex
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 4,510
Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mx_599
so do you or don't you save rotational weight with them? stan's would have you believe you do. i was thinking about trying tubeless, but if the only benefit is allowing you a broader spectrum of pressures than i am not as interested.
i was under the impression you saved a lot of weight.
i guess not?
i was under the impression you saved a lot of weight.
i guess not?
If you go with the Stan's system on standard rims with standard tires you obviously have the same weight tires but you have to run the strips and add the slime. Not sure what that weighs but I understood it to be comparable to what a tube weighs. This is what my wheel builder explained to me.
#16
Lost in the Black Hills
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by santiago
Depends on if you're going UST or just using the Stan's system on traditional tires. From what I understand UST tires are heavier than their equivalent standard tires. I did a quick check on the Schwalbe site and found the Nobby Nics I have are listed at 495g for the 26x2.1" in standard and weigh 710g for the same UST tire. I don't know if all tires are that way. I am actually surprised by the weight difference
If you go with the Stan's system on standard rims with standard tires you obviously have the same weight tires but you have to run the strips and add the slime. Not sure what that weighs but I understood it to be comparable to what a tube weighs. This is what my wheel builder explained to me.
If you go with the Stan's system on standard rims with standard tires you obviously have the same weight tires but you have to run the strips and add the slime. Not sure what that weighs but I understood it to be comparable to what a tube weighs. This is what my wheel builder explained to me.
i have seen total mixed reviews of slime. so i hesitantly pose the question again. have any of you had what you believe to be any success with Slime in a regular tube?
thanks
__________________
Tomac Mountain Bikes | Light-Bikes l Magura USA | Industry Nine | Schwalbe Tires | Caffélatex
Tomac Mountain Bikes | Light-Bikes l Magura USA | Industry Nine | Schwalbe Tires | Caffélatex
#17
Official Website Waterboy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,271
Bikes: a lot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tubeless tire are heavier because of a stiffer sidewall and a sealing layer, My Epic was converted to UST, after it was all done I bet there isn't ten grams difference per wheel. Running standard tires, (Which are lighter) tubeless with a little extra sealant to seal the tire and make it airtight can save some weight over a standard tube or UST setup, but I wouldn't reccomend it for heavy riders, For me the big gains in going tubeless is that I never flat anymore, and I have less rolling resistance, even at lower pressure for some reason.
#18
Lost in the Black Hills
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks guys. i only weigh 130-140, but it still is not sounding worth it to me.
__________________
Tomac Mountain Bikes | Light-Bikes l Magura USA | Industry Nine | Schwalbe Tires | Caffélatex
Tomac Mountain Bikes | Light-Bikes l Magura USA | Industry Nine | Schwalbe Tires | Caffélatex
#19
mmm... chicken!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 668
Bikes: 04 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
my experience with stan's has been positive. lost some weight but mainly due to folding bead tyres instead of wire beaded ones, weight loss was not particularly significant unless you're being a weight weenie? anyways, pinch flats have been a worry of the past, but i have yet to add extra sealant in the tyre which may pose a problem. only real difficulty with initial setup was the availability of a compressor, but once you have that, follow instructions carefully and setup was a breeze first time.
#20
Just shy of 400W
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 766
Bikes: Cannondale System 6, Klein Palomino
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Literally, the ONLY reason to go tubeless is to be able to run lower pressures. They wont be lighter. I run tubeless now, and I love it. I can run 25 psi and have no problems, which I do on a regular basis.
__________________
2008 Cannondale System Six
2016 Pivot Mach 5.5
2008 Cannondale System Six
2016 Pivot Mach 5.5
#22
Taking "s" outta "Fast"
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zoo York City
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh, I forgot. I weighed both my wheels and complete bike before and after, and lost more than 1/2 lb after the Stan's conversion using the same tire/wheel combo (mavic 317s and specialized adrenaline pros). So, yea, booyah.
p.s. I was using normal non DH tubes prior.
p.s. I was using normal non DH tubes prior.
#23
Official Website Waterboy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,271
Bikes: a lot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just another reason I like the setup, pulled the hardtail down yesterday for a ride notice the front tire was a little soft, just rode it sunday, anyways aired it up and went riding. when I got home I wanted to make a few adjustments so I put it in the stand and while it was there I looked at that front tire and found a thorn, grabbed some pliers , pulled it out, ssssss rotated the tire so the stan's could do it's thing.
next time around all was quiet, the only eveidence of the hole was a small milky bead of sealant.
next time around all was quiet, the only eveidence of the hole was a small milky bead of sealant.
#24
Taking "s" outta "Fast"
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zoo York City
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yea, I love it when that happens.
When I first installed it at the shop we tested the system out by going at it like serial killers with sharpend spokes and pens. It was awesome.
When I first installed it at the shop we tested the system out by going at it like serial killers with sharpend spokes and pens. It was awesome.
#25
Official Website Waterboy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,271
Bikes: a lot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AfterThisNap
Yea, I love it when that happens.
When I first installed it at the shop we tested the system out by going at it like serial killers with sharpend spokes and pens. It was awesome.
When I first installed it at the shop we tested the system out by going at it like serial killers with sharpend spokes and pens. It was awesome.