Ive had a 91 951 and 99 C4. I am assuming youre questioning the wall.
I am still Porsches biggest fan:p

http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...4/DSC01087.jpg

M3? Blasphemer.

It weights in at 27 lbs. without the clunk:D

Here is my new bike. I know you like my carpet and no the Dragons a lite not a bong....

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m...Picture007.jpg

The carpet scares me.

Probably about 75 rigid/25 suspension. I ride it mainly rigid locally but if I am taking it to unknown trails I will usually use a suspension fork for fear of the unknown.

I am probably going to sell the Reba and keep the White Brothers Magic and swap it between the two bikes.

+1

http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w...s/DSCN1604.jpg

Upgrades include SID Team, Easton EC90 carbon bar, Easton EC70 carbon post, Truvative Noir carbon crankset, XTR rear der, Mavic Crossmax SL wheelset and Avid Ti brakes... It weighs in at 21lb 14oz right now...

the seat stays on those gts are so cool

Nice looking. Too racy for me, and once you go riser bars, you won't look back, but it does look good. Built for speed, that one.

the tripple tirangle is crazy. your bike looks super fast. it's nice to see GT back in the game. sweet ride!

how does one post a picture like that? host it then post the link? thanks in advance.

I love that exchange. My proudest BF moment. It was a few pages ago for those interested, and I do like to think that his embarassment there made him change his forum name.

You're supposed to use square brackets for sic.

Bro, Sweet Pontiac Dude! Do you wear the mullet up or down when you ride?

Very funny, guess who got the last laugh though.

It's funny cause it's true.

Another great user name. Thats rockin'.

Whassa travel on that sucker, Smashy?

140mm front, 150mm rear travel.

i have always noticed that fs bikes usually have equal travel front and back, and if not that they have more up front than in back.

Is this how the fat possum is meant to be or is it personal preference?

While having equal travel front and rear may seem logical, but remember with the suspension properly set up the rear is supposed to have more sag than the front. With the matched travel with out the sag, then put in sag, the bike is going to feel awkward when riding. Having at least 10mm extra travel in the back with the sag will make for a much more balanced ride.
Rear:

150x.30=45
150-45=105

Front

140x.25=35
140-35=105

With sag set up, it's equal, how you had it:

Rear:
150x.30=45
150-45=105

Front:

150X.25=37.5
150=37.5=112.5

Which makes for a very imbalanced ride.
That 10mm difference allows the bike to ride more balanced.

i see, so its not about the travel, its about the travel minus sag

heres my salsa
 

im not very good at taking pics so
http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s...3/salsa004.jpg
front side view-2006 xtr crank and 8 speed xtr derrailure
http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s...3/salsa005.jpg
rear view- carbon seat stays
http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s...3/salsa009.jpg
http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s...3/salsa006.jpg

pic that didnt show up
 

sweet ride. what kind of fork do you have on it?