Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Larger Front Tire?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Larger Front Tire?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-07 | 11:43 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
OTB
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Larger Front Tire?

In the old days (probably from my BMX time in the early 80's) I ran a smaller tire in the rear. On and off, I still do this with on my mtb bike. I will run a 2.1 on the front and a 1.95 on the rear.
Anyone else doing this or am I just old?
mikejo is offline  
Reply
Old 01-19-07 | 11:46 PM
  #2  
gattm99's Avatar
Rouleur
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 741
Likes: 5
From: HARRISBURG IL

Bikes: ROAD MOUNTAIN

Nope lets of guys, myself included. Your probably more likely to find a 2.35 or bigger on the front and a 2.1 on the back though.
gattm99 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-19-07 | 11:52 PM
  #3  
Hopper's Avatar
Ride bike or bike ride?
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia

Bikes: MongoosePro DH, Dart custom road bike, .243 Racing FR street bike

I run 2.5 front and back. Main reason is, when my rear become bold I switch the old front to the rear and then put a new tyre on the front. If I buy race specific tyres I usually get a 2.35 rear and a 2,5 front.
Hopper is offline  
Reply
Old 01-20-07 | 11:55 PM
  #4  
euroford's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: chicago
a 2.3 is the smallest i run. lately i find myself running 2.5's and 2.7's sometimes. i've become a real fan of the big fat meats. i could understand wanting to mix it up and run a bigger tire in the front than the back, but honestly its not a practice that has appealed to my riding. but i'm on a hardtail, so i appreciate the extra give back there.

though really, for my riding today (fairly smooth trails on frozen mud) i could have had a thinner tire and been a bit faster. maybe for just such an occasion its time for me to pick up some 1.9's.

i guess, as kind of a not very good answer to your question; buy lots of tires. buy a tire that you think would be good for any of the conditions you ride in, and swap around as you see fit. if you think a bigger tire up front will work better, go for it.
euroford is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 01:07 AM
  #5  
FlatFender's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh NC
Panaracer Fire 2.4 in the front
Panaracer Fire 2.1 in the rear
FlatFender is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 01:48 AM
  #6  
wethepeople's Avatar
Long haired freak.
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 0
From: Still stuck in hell.

Bikes: 2011 SE Old Man Flyer.

Zulu is 3.0 front and 2.5 back. I like the extra control you gain, I also like being able to look down at a giant tire .
__________________

"the bus came by and I got on, that's when it all began...there was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land."


Last edited by wethepeople; 01-21-07 at 04:05 AM.
wethepeople is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 03:13 AM
  #7  
Cornish_Rdr_UK's Avatar
Withdrawal Symptoms!
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
From: Cornwall UK

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Sport Disc 2004 And identit Dr Jekyll

2.5 front and 2.3 rear.

On the XC bike I ran the same....2.1 front and rear
Cornish_Rdr_UK is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 08:22 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
OTB
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
I guess I forgot to say this would be for cross country riding on a hard tail.
mikejo is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 11:23 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
hmmm having a hardtail i would have thought it would be better havin the bigger on the back, guess i better swap mine round as i have 2.5 back 2.3 front
ashleywood.ash is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 11:40 AM
  #10  
jgedwa's Avatar
surly old man
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 44
From: Carlisle, PA

Bikes: IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.

Clydes who ride road bikes often have bigger tires on back to support their weight. Makes sense in the road world, but with MTB tires I would think there is no reason to have a bigger tire in back.

Is this wrong?

jim
jgedwa is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 12:08 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
OTB
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
I think I will go with a 2.1 Cinder on the front and a 1.95 on the back. Looking down a skinny tire while bombing down singletrack might be kind of scary. Think I'll log on to Jensen and maybe throw a couple of CN 9971 chains on the bill while I am at it.
mikejo is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 05:33 PM
  #12  
FreeRidin''s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: Boulderado

Bikes: Intense SS, Old spesh P series, ski/snow bike, fixie conversion

I even run two completely different tires...2.4 Maxxis Holly Roller rear, 2.5 Maxxis Highroller front.

But just purchased 2 2.35 Maxxis LarsenTTs.

Last edited by FreeRidin'; 01-21-07 at 08:14 PM.
FreeRidin' is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 07:02 PM
  #13  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Me, I'm running a 42a 26x2.5 High Roller up front and 60a 26x2.35 high roller on the back.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-07 | 08:38 PM
  #14  
DirtPedalerB's Avatar
unofficial roadie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Out in the woods you see

Bikes: 2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike

I usually run a narrower/lighter tire on the rear.. you can get better acceleration that way. On the front I run a 2.1 or bigger knobby.. you really don't notice weight/ resistance there as bad as you would if it was on the back.
DirtPedalerB is offline  
Reply
Old 01-22-07 | 05:22 AM
  #15  
BROCK SAMPSON's Avatar
rules the earth
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: melbourne,Australia

Bikes: norco kompressor 06, DK general lee

Originally Posted by DirtPedalerB
I usually run a narrower/lighter tire on the rear.. you can get better acceleration that way. On the front I run a 2.1 or bigger knobby.. you really don't notice weight/ resistance there as bad as you would if it was on the back.
Yeah I've found that aswell and it might sound stupid but i think its easier to mono/wheelie with a narrower/slicker rear tire, I think it's got to do with the acceleration. I find that a fatter/knobbier front tyre helps on obstacles and stuff rolling over things + I hate having a front tire that skids out from under me but with the rear I don't really mind. I'm running a maxxis holy roller 2.4 up the front with a holy roller 1.9 in the rear.
BROCK SAMPSON is offline  
Reply
Old 01-22-07 | 11:16 AM
  #16  
here and there's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
I run a WTB motoraptor comp 2.4" in front and an IRC mibro 2.25" in rear. Occasionally I'll use a Panaracer Fire xc pro 2.1" in the rear.
here and there is offline  
Reply
Old 01-22-07 | 05:40 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
ok so i have a 2.5 up front what would you suggest for the back on a hardrock, i do i lot of woodland riding roots and mud and stuff
ashleywood.ash is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-07 | 07:38 AM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Still being somewhat of a NOOB this is the first I have heard of running different size tires on front and rear. Can someone briefly give the reasoning behind this? Does it really make a difference? I noticed some of you commenting that you have less drag on the rear by having the smaller tire, but doesnt that also sacrifice some traction?

Also is there a normal ratio for size of front to rears or more or less a personal preference type of thing?
bruce.eash is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-07 | 08:07 AM
  #19  
Just Ride
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne - Australia

Bikes: 2005 Giant Yukon with the works.

Originally Posted by FlatFender
Panaracer Fire 2.4 in the front
Panaracer Fire 2.1 in the rear
The Panaracer Fire FR 2.4 is close to a Maxxis 2.7 in size when your talking about tread width. 2.7 - 2.1, big size difference don't you think?

Anyway i use 2.5 Kenda Nevegal Stick-E up front and 2.35 Maxxis Ignitor rear for DH. For XC, i just use the Ignitor's. All seems to work pretty well for me.
[bEn] is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-07 | 09:04 AM
  #20  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Originally Posted by bruce.eash
Still being somewhat of a NOOB this is the first I have heard of running different size tires on front and rear. Can someone briefly give the reasoning behind this? Does it really make a difference? I noticed some of you commenting that you have less drag on the rear by having the smaller tire, but doesnt that also sacrifice some traction?

Also is there a normal ratio for size of front to rears or more or less a personal preference type of thing?
Handling reasons when cornering.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.