Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Full Suspension ROCKS!

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Full Suspension ROCKS!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-03 | 02:31 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Full Suspension ROCKS!

Ok so some of you may know that I've had my new Stumpjumper FSR Comp for a few weeks now and I've put a few good rides on it and I must say the FS world kicks ass. Here are a few things for the hard tailers to think about ... (for those who care)

1. With FS you rarely lose traction in the rear going uphill. This is something I didn't expect, but works like a charm.

2. You can pretty much sit down while going downhill. No more ball jitters.

3. Not nearly as much vibration on your arms!

4. If you have lockouts, your bike will feel just like a rigid on the street. I was surprised at how different it rides with both shocks locked out.

5. Landing jumps is so smoooooooooooth.

6. One thing that kind of caught me by surprise one ride was when I was cornering pretty hard/fast and I hit a little rut in the ground. Since the front shock was compressed I lost traction as I went over the rut almost bailing.

7. Ride height is much higher than bike made 10 years ago. I'm still getting used to being so high on downhills.

8. Disc brakes kick ASS! I used to have to anticipate when to brake ... now I can just mash on them at the exact moment I need to slow down. Careful about going over the bars though.

Just some of my riding experiences in the past few weeks. I'm excited to go out everyday.
jtown is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-03 | 03:02 PM
  #2  
bikeCOLORADO's Avatar
#GoatRidesBikes.com
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: SW MO
Wahoo! Another dual squishy convert!

I've been riding a dual squishy with hydraulic disc brakes for three years now - trying to convince all my riding buddies to upgrade. Each one that does...after a few rides - stands before me smacking their forehead saying "Why the heck didn't I do this before"!?
__________________
GoatRidesBikes.com
bikeCOLORADO is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-03 | 06:08 PM
  #3  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Wood Licker
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Ht Lover here. I understand the point to a dually but won't get one till I think my riding deserves it...

Point number 7 - ride height is higher...your bike must be setup funny. On dh you should be almost chopper style
Maelstrom is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-03 | 06:53 PM
  #4  
Jim311's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Florida
Some things that suck about dual suspension:



1) A dual suspension bike will NEVER be as efficient as a hardtail

2) The front suspension may compress, but you have no rear shock to rebound while the front compresses, tossing you off the bike

3) You can out sprint everyone riding their 30+ pound full suspension

4) Your bike will ALWAYS weigh less than a dual suspension bike ever will



Granted, dual suspension has it's merit.. in fact I actually have one. But I end up riding my hardtail more than anything. At the end of the day the hardtail leaves me feeling much less worn out than my dual suspension does. But when the urban assault time comes around I'll be riding my dually.
Jim311 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-03 | 07:58 PM
  #5  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Originally posted by Jim311
Some things that suck about dual suspension:



1) A dual suspension bike will NEVER be as efficient as a hardtail
one word: Epic

2) The front suspension may compress, but you have no rear shock to rebound while the front compresses, tossing you off the bike This is BS

3) You can out sprint everyone riding their 30+ pound full suspension It's not the bike that is faster it is the person operating the bike.

4) Your bike will ALWAYS weigh less than a dual suspension bike ever will Done correctly a cf FS MTB could weigh as much as a hardtail.



Granted, dual suspension has it's merit.. in fact I actually have one. But I end up riding my hardtail more than anything. At the end of the day the hardtail leaves me feeling much less worn out than my dual suspension does. But when the urban assault time comes around I'll be riding my dually.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-03 | 08:09 PM
  #6  
Jim311's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Florida
If you've never experienced the bucking of a FS bike when the front shock compresses and the rear rebounds you've never ridden a FS bike. In fact, the author of this thread even said it happened to him. I ride a FS, so I know. Not to mention I've read countless articles mentioning it.


Also, there's no way you can argue that a person with a hardtail against a person on a heavier dual suspension is going to lose in a sprint.. NO WAY.


And lastly... if your hardtail doesn't weigh less than an identically specced full suspension, you probably oughta find a lighter frame.
Jim311 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-03 | 08:25 PM
  #7  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Originally posted by Jim311
If you've never experienced the bucking of a FS bike when the front shock compresses and the rear rebounds you've never ridden a FS bike. In fact, the author of this thread even said it happened to him. I ride a FS, so I know. Not to mention I've read countless articles mentioning it.


Also, there's no way you can argue that a person with a hardtail against a person on a heavier dual suspension is going to lose in a sprint.. NO WAY.


And lastly... if your hardtail doesn't weigh less than an identically specced full suspension, you probably oughta find a lighter frame.
I ride FS, I have never noticed any bucking, maybee because I have it set to my preferences. Stiffer springs solve the problem right there. The sprint thing you mention is false, a FS bike provides better tracking and grip in exchange for weight. Thus it is the rider who makes the difference. I have equally specced bikes, 1 hardtail, 1 full suspension, my FS is quicker. As I said if you manage the weight of the components, a cf FS bike can weigh as much as a hardtail.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-03 | 10:12 PM
  #8  
Chuvak's Avatar
Advertise here!
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: 2002 Allez A1xx SE

I think there is no point to convince anybody that one better then another. There is a bike for every style. Hard tail for XC, FS for DH, urban assault, FR. Road for road of course. Sure you can make a 30 footer on FS. And if you want you can even make it on a hard tail, but that hard tail is better be strong as hell. You can enter a road race and claim that your FSR has all traction road bike can wish for due to your full suspension, but there is no way you can actually compete with the speed of a road bike and it’s weight and these are not the only factors. You can’t just compare 2 bikes that are built for different uses. That’s what I think.
Chuvak is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-03 | 10:55 PM
  #9  
Jim311's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Florida
This is NOT a hard concept to understand. It's common knowledge. When you hit the front brake, reguardless of how stiff you have your springs setup, the front WILL dive. And that same concept is compounded when the rear suspension of a bike rebounds, thus pushing the rear up and the front down.


Seriously.. there's no way a FS can weigh the same as a hardtail. If you build them both out of the same materials using the same technology obviously the FS is going to have more parts. Show me a FS frame that weighs less than 3 pounds. You said tracking from FS helps.. but not in a sprint. You'll be bobbing and bouncing while I'm pulling ahead on my HT. I've been riding a long time on both FS and HT.. I know what I'm talking about. I don't make this stuff up just to talk out of my ass.
Jim311 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-03 | 11:04 PM
  #10  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Originally posted by Jim311
This is NOT a hard concept to understand. It's common knowledge. When you hit the front brake, reguardless of how stiff you have your springs setup, the front WILL dive. And that same concept is compounded when the rear suspension of a bike rebounds, thus pushing the rear up and the front down.


Seriously.. there's no way a FS can weigh the same as a hardtail. If you build them both out of the same materials using the same technology obviously the FS is going to have more parts. Show me a FS frame that weighs less than 3 pounds. You said tracking from FS helps.. but not in a sprint. You'll be bobbing and bouncing while I'm pulling ahead on my HT. I've been riding a long time on both FS and HT.. I know what I'm talking about. I don't make this stuff up just to talk out of my ass.
That's why there is rear lock out, a simple thing, my xc fs is rigged with remote lock out. BTW, I can drop you fairly easily, ht or fs. Been riding for 19 years now, 7th year on a FS bike, been racing for 10. I will give hardtails one advantage, a hardtail is a much better urban bike and a better dirt jumper. I just enjoy my full suspension bikes better than my hardtails. I'm just debating just for debating.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.

Last edited by Dannihilator; 05-08-03 at 11:16 PM.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 12:05 AM
  #11  
Jim311's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Florida
We'll see about that, old man!

Jim311 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 12:11 AM
  #12  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Originally posted by Jim311
We'll see about that, old man!

We will see about that.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 05:54 AM
  #13  
math2p14's Avatar
Part of the furniture
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
From: Exeter UK, Athens Greece.

Bikes: Specialized RH, Scott Unitrack

HT rules! but then again that is my opinion. If i was on a bottomless budget i would probably have a second bike dually. But duallies need more servicing than HT (bushings. bearings etc) and i love simplicity so i love HTs.
math2p14 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 06:23 AM
  #14  
riderx's Avatar
BFSSFG old timer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 1
From: Fredrock
Originally posted by bikeCOLORADO
I've been riding a dual squishy with hydraulic disc brakes for three years now - trying to convince all my riding buddies to upgrade. Each one that does...after a few rides - stands before me smacking their forehead saying "Why the heck didn't I do this before"!?
Strange, that's what all the single speed converts do too!
riderx is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 06:54 AM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
wow ... didn't really mean to say one was better than the other. just my first experiences on a FS. =)
jtown is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 07:48 AM
  #16  
schnell's Avatar
Eleventy Billion Posts
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
BTW, I can drop you fairly easily, ht or fs.
Ooooh, you're a tough typer!


Been riding for 19 years now, 7th year on a FS bike, been racing for 10.
According to your profile, you were born in 1980. Riding a bigwheel doesn't count.


schnell is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 08:58 AM
  #17  
bikeCOLORADO's Avatar
#GoatRidesBikes.com
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: SW MO
Bucking? I've never been bucked from either of my dualies in 3 years of riding.

The secret to buck prevention is proper setup...it's a fine balance with rebound control. You want to set it up so that it's fast/slow enough to bounce ONCE and return to normal position after riding flat off a curb. Too slow and the suspension will "pack up" when hitting successive bumps and you'll bottom out. Too fast and your suspension action is more like a springy pogo stick than a well tuned suspension.

Just as with so many other things in our human experience - it all boils down to personal preferences with HT or FS. Your primary riding terrain choice contributes heavily to your choice/preference as well.

I'm a diehard FS rider. I like VERY technical, rocky trails with ledges, lifts and corpses. There's certainly no arguing the fact that virtually ANY HT is more efficient AND lighter than my full suspension 32lb Freeride/XC bike! There's also no arguing the fact that to keep up with a lightweight stickboy on a lightweight HT bike - I've got to me MUCH stronger!
__________________
GoatRidesBikes.com
bikeCOLORADO is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 10:14 AM
  #18  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Originally posted by schnell
Ooooh, you're a tough typer!




According to your profile, you were born in 1980. Riding a bigwheel doesn't count.


Was on two wheels at the age of 4. I never had a big wheel.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 10:31 AM
  #19  
schnell's Avatar
Eleventy Billion Posts
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
So have I, and I don't have an attitude.

I haven't even pointed out the fact that I could drop you, even though it would be "extremely easy" for me.
schnell is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 10:41 AM
  #20  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Originally posted by schnell
So have I, and I don't have an attitude.

I haven't even pointed out the fact that I could drop you, even though it would be "extremely easy" for me.
I usually don't have an attitude. Just when I feel like it.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 11:07 AM
  #21  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Wood Licker
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Yeah well...all of you could drop me...

I'm a diehard FS rider. I like VERY technical, rocky trails with ledges, lifts and corpses. There's certainly no arguing the fact that virtually ANY HT is more efficient AND lighter than my full suspension 32lb Freeride/XC bike! There's also no arguing the fact that to keep up with a lightweight stickboy on a lightweight HT bike - I've got to me MUCH stronger
What is with all the super light bikes. My ht is heavier than that ...the dually I am looking at buying would be a minimum of 40 pounds haha
Maelstrom is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 11:24 AM
  #22  
bikeCOLORADO's Avatar
#GoatRidesBikes.com
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: SW MO
I consider sub 26lb a light bike!

Around Whistler BC (or maybe anywhere in Canda)...40lbs is probably considered an XC bike!
__________________
GoatRidesBikes.com
bikeCOLORADO is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 11:29 AM
  #23  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Wood Licker
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Originally posted by bikeCOLORADO
I consider sub 26lb a light bike!

Around Whistler BC (or maybe anywhere in Canda)...40lbs is probably considered an XC bike!
I was just kidding...I am also 260.. I need to loose weight before my bike does...

No just western canada...
Maelstrom is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 06:31 PM
  #24  
New to bikeforùms.net
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Look at the title of the thread (Full Suspension Rocks) FSR BABY!!!
KleinMp99 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-09-03 | 06:34 PM
  #25  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Originally posted by KleinMp99
Look at the title of the thread (Full Suspension Rocks) FSR BABY!!!
Word.
jtown is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.