Importance of rear suspension?
#26
Too Much Crazy
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 3
From: NY
Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9
#27
I just ordered a hard tail not really having a clue as to what I should have gotten. I went hardtail because it seems that you can get more bike for your money and seemingly less maintenance issues. Are there certain types of terrain which dictate what type of bike, FS versus HT, one should use or is it simply a matter of personal preference? I live in the foothills of the Appalachian mtns. so we have all kinds of terrain here. Thanks!
#28
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Bikes: Scott CR1-Gary Fisher Sugar-Litespeed Ultimate
IMHO... You are going to be standing on technical and downhill sections, using your arms and legs for your suspension, no mater what type of bike you have. The beauty of the rear suspension is in all the rest of the ride, where you can sit comfortably while pedalling over smaller junk.
#29
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
IMHO... You are going to be standing on technical and downhill sections, using your arms and legs for your suspension, no mater what type of bike you have. The beauty of the rear suspension is in all the rest of the ride, where you can sit comfortably while pedalling over smaller junk.
My MTB only has a suspension fork and seatpost, which goes with the idea of, if the terrain is difficult enough, I'll be standing anyway; but if I'm just cruising, the seatpost absorbs the annoying bumps. I get the (relative) pedaling efficiency of a hardtail (but without a lockout fork, unfortunately) and comfort when I need it.
I think that FS is more of a benefit if I want to pedal harder/more often on difficult terrain. I'd figure that my hardtail would be moving too much.
#32
Banned.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
" It's also a better workout because you get to experience pedal bob."
hmm, never really thought about it that way...lol
hmm, never really thought about it that way...lol
#33
Wood Licker


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
I remember last week there was a thread I said was the funniest....I take it back, this is. The misinformation and lack of knowledge is really comical. Some of the answers given were actually correct
#34
#35
Wood Licker


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002





