Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Upgrading crankset (is it really worth it?)

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Upgrading crankset (is it really worth it?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-07 | 12:13 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Canberra Australia (spitting distance to Mt Stromlo - 2009 World champ locale)

Bikes: KHS Alite 1000, KHS xc 604, Boss USA bmx

Upgrading crankset (is it really worth it?)

I'm currently running with some Truvativ Firex Giga X Pipe, 44/32/22 cranks (stock with new bike). I've searched the net to try and find some info on these cranks but can't find much. All I could find that this crankset seems to be stock on low to mid-range bikes.

I found a deal for a Shimano XTR FC- M960 crankset reasonably cheap (including installation tools, spacers and b/b) . Is it worth upgrading or would I be better off just upgrading my wheelset? (but really who can turn down a bargain when they see one)

I mainly do cross country but love downhill riding with small jumps/drops just as much (who doesn't?)

any advice or comments would be appreciated.
xc beggar is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-07 | 01:01 AM
  #2  
RT's Avatar
RT
The Weird Beard
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,554
Likes: 3
From: COS
What do you mean by upgrade? Are you looking for expensive high-end components, or something more affordable and solid, albeit heavy, with more teeth? I 'upgraded' my standard MTB crankset to a simple Nashbar 48/38/28 crankset and haver never looked back. I think crank, BB and chain all cost around $110 USD installed.

It really depends on what you want to achieve.
RT is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-07 | 09:54 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 1
From: southern oregon
The xtr's are great cranks, if you can afford them go for it. Advantages will be lighter weight, stiffer, and possibly smoother shifting.

Don't listen to toddorado, a nashbar 48/38/28 crankset is not an "upgrade" on just about any bike. I'm not even sure where they came up with those teeth numbers honestly, 46/36/24 was the old standard.
mcoine is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-07 | 10:30 AM
  #4  
kenhill3's Avatar
use your best eye
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 1
From: Olympia, Washington

Bikes: '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli

Originally Posted by mcoine
The xtr's are great cranks, if you can afford them go for it. Advantages will be lighter weight, stiffer, and possibly smoother shifting.

Don't listen to toddorado, a nashbar 48/38/28 crankset is not an "upgrade" on just about any bike. I'm not even sure where they came up with those teeth numbers honestly, 46/36/24 was the old standard.

+1 on the XTR's. The only caution may be the cost of the chainrings when it comes time to replace. Shimano replacements will be big bucks, while aftermarket better pricing.

The Nashbar 48/38/28 would be a silly choice for offroad.
__________________
"I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.
kenhill3 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-07 | 10:32 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
+something as long as it refers to XTR, not Nashbar.
Fable is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-07 | 10:58 AM
  #6  
cryptid01's Avatar
one less horse
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,601
Likes: 2
From: The Hinterlands
One possible issue with the 960 XTR crankset is the oddball bolt pattern (102 vs. 104mm BCD). Aftermarket chainring and bashring options exist, but are limited.
cryptid01 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-07 | 12:34 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 18
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX, Trek Checkpoint

fwiw, chainreactioncycles.com has the M760 XT cranksets for $138. now thats a deal.
TXBDan is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-07 | 04:03 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Canberra Australia (spitting distance to Mt Stromlo - 2009 World champ locale)

Bikes: KHS Alite 1000, KHS xc 604, Boss USA bmx

Thanks for the replies... I knew the xtr's were a great crank but I just wasn't sure how much of an upgrade it was from what I already have as I couldn't find much info on the Truvati's. I think shouting myself an xmas present is in order here.

FYI: the xtr's seem to retail for about 1000 here in Australia, but the ones I found are going for less than half price.

One last thing - these xtr's come in 175 mm only - is that the standard? - and also when checking the length on my current set to compare - is that measurement the full length of the crank or from bb bolt hole to pedal bolt hole??
xc beggar is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-07 | 04:12 PM
  #9  
pinkrobe's Avatar
DNPAIMFB
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,655
Likes: 0
From: Cowtown, AB

Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.

48/38/28 is ye olde skool toothing - it predates "Compact Drive" and usually is found on bikes from the early 90's or previous. It can also be found on touring bikes ridden by bearded guys with Bell V1 Pro helmets.
pinkrobe is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-07 | 05:21 PM
  #10  
colombo357's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 30
From: Murica
You will probably notice zero difference with the "new" cranks.

You'll save some weight (150grams or so). That's about it. Maybe add some rigidity, but not everyone can tell the difference.
colombo357 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-07 | 12:53 PM
  #11  
boyvirgil's Avatar
Peace
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TXBDan
fwiw, chainreactioncycles.com has the M760 XT cranksets for $138. now thats a deal.
omg get it do it do it seriously
boyvirgil is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-07 | 01:17 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kenhill3
+1 on the XTR's. The only caution may be the cost of the chainrings when it comes time to replace. Shimano replacements will be big bucks, while aftermarket better pricing.

The Nashbar 48/38/28 would be a silly choice for offroad.
This is exactly why folks should only consider 2006 or later XTR cranksets. Pre 2006 has an irregular bolt pattern and soft chainrings. They are being cleared out pretty much everywhere below cost.

As long as you keep up with changing the chain, the 2006+ XTR middle ring should last multiple seasons. It's titanium (w/ carbon molded chain ramps) which has exceptional wear properties under this application. The 2007 XTR has a similar setup except the ring is steel with carbon ramps. Though for some reason they still include an aluminum granny ... yuck!!!

XTRs come in 165mm, 170mm, 175mm and 180mm. I'm running 180mm XTs. So far so good.
BearSquirrel is offline  
Reply
Old 12-26-07 | 09:01 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Canberra Australia (spitting distance to Mt Stromlo - 2009 World champ locale)

Bikes: KHS Alite 1000, KHS xc 604, Boss USA bmx

Got the cranks a few days ago. Do I need to have specific XTR components (as in same year) to fit these cranks - I'd like to get full XTR running gear or can XTR components from different years work ok together.?
xc beggar is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.