Upgrading crankset (is it really worth it?)
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Canberra Australia (spitting distance to Mt Stromlo - 2009 World champ locale)
Bikes: KHS Alite 1000, KHS xc 604, Boss USA bmx
Upgrading crankset (is it really worth it?)
I'm currently running with some Truvativ Firex Giga X Pipe, 44/32/22 cranks (stock with new bike). I've searched the net to try and find some info on these cranks but can't find much. All I could find that this crankset seems to be stock on low to mid-range bikes.
I found a deal for a Shimano XTR FC- M960 crankset reasonably cheap (including installation tools, spacers and b/b) . Is it worth upgrading or would I be better off just upgrading my wheelset? (but really who can turn down a bargain when they see one)
I mainly do cross country but love downhill riding with small jumps/drops just as much (who doesn't?)
any advice or comments would be appreciated.
I found a deal for a Shimano XTR FC- M960 crankset reasonably cheap (including installation tools, spacers and b/b) . Is it worth upgrading or would I be better off just upgrading my wheelset? (but really who can turn down a bargain when they see one)
I mainly do cross country but love downhill riding with small jumps/drops just as much (who doesn't?)
any advice or comments would be appreciated.
#2
What do you mean by upgrade? Are you looking for expensive high-end components, or something more affordable and solid, albeit heavy, with more teeth? I 'upgraded' my standard MTB crankset to a simple Nashbar 48/38/28 crankset and haver never looked back. I think crank, BB and chain all cost around $110 USD installed.
It really depends on what you want to achieve.
It really depends on what you want to achieve.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 1
From: southern oregon
The xtr's are great cranks, if you can afford them go for it. Advantages will be lighter weight, stiffer, and possibly smoother shifting.
Don't listen to toddorado, a nashbar 48/38/28 crankset is not an "upgrade" on just about any bike. I'm not even sure where they came up with those teeth numbers honestly, 46/36/24 was the old standard.
Don't listen to toddorado, a nashbar 48/38/28 crankset is not an "upgrade" on just about any bike. I'm not even sure where they came up with those teeth numbers honestly, 46/36/24 was the old standard.
#4
use your best eye
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 1
From: Olympia, Washington
Bikes: '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli
The xtr's are great cranks, if you can afford them go for it. Advantages will be lighter weight, stiffer, and possibly smoother shifting.
Don't listen to toddorado, a nashbar 48/38/28 crankset is not an "upgrade" on just about any bike. I'm not even sure where they came up with those teeth numbers honestly, 46/36/24 was the old standard.
Don't listen to toddorado, a nashbar 48/38/28 crankset is not an "upgrade" on just about any bike. I'm not even sure where they came up with those teeth numbers honestly, 46/36/24 was the old standard.
+1 on the XTR's. The only caution may be the cost of the chainrings when it comes time to replace. Shimano replacements will be big bucks, while aftermarket better pricing.
The Nashbar 48/38/28 would be a silly choice for offroad.
__________________
"I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.
"I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.
#8
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Canberra Australia (spitting distance to Mt Stromlo - 2009 World champ locale)
Bikes: KHS Alite 1000, KHS xc 604, Boss USA bmx
Thanks for the replies... I knew the xtr's were a great crank but I just wasn't sure how much of an upgrade it was from what I already have as I couldn't find much info on the Truvati's. I think shouting myself an xmas present is in order here.
FYI: the xtr's seem to retail for about 1000 here in Australia, but the ones I found are going for less than half price.
One last thing - these xtr's come in 175 mm only - is that the standard? - and also when checking the length on my current set to compare - is that measurement the full length of the crank or from bb bolt hole to pedal bolt hole??
FYI: the xtr's seem to retail for about 1000 here in Australia, but the ones I found are going for less than half price.
One last thing - these xtr's come in 175 mm only - is that the standard? - and also when checking the length on my current set to compare - is that measurement the full length of the crank or from bb bolt hole to pedal bolt hole??
#9
DNPAIMFB
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,655
Likes: 0
From: Cowtown, AB
Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
48/38/28 is ye olde skool toothing - it predates "Compact Drive" and usually is found on bikes from the early 90's or previous. It can also be found on touring bikes ridden by bearded guys with Bell V1 Pro helmets.
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
As long as you keep up with changing the chain, the 2006+ XTR middle ring should last multiple seasons. It's titanium (w/ carbon molded chain ramps) which has exceptional wear properties under this application. The 2007 XTR has a similar setup except the ring is steel with carbon ramps. Though for some reason they still include an aluminum granny ... yuck!!!
XTRs come in 165mm, 170mm, 175mm and 180mm. I'm running 180mm XTs. So far so good.
#13
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Canberra Australia (spitting distance to Mt Stromlo - 2009 World champ locale)
Bikes: KHS Alite 1000, KHS xc 604, Boss USA bmx
Got the cranks a few days ago. Do I need to have specific XTR components (as in same year) to fit these cranks - I'd like to get full XTR running gear or can XTR components from different years work ok together.?






