Anyone riding full rigid?
#26
Life is Fun
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 21
Bikes: 94 Kona Kilauea (hardtail, nothing stock but the frame and seatpost); 03 Motobecane Le Champion (stock, minus a front wheel upgrade); 05 Haro Shift R5 (all stock)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I rode and raced full rigid for years until I had a bit of a mishap while riding the ski slopes during the summer...seems I allowed my headset to work itself loose and then during the descent the fork decided to buckle under the bike. So now I'm riding with shocks up front...and I must say I like 'em.
#27
The Weird Beard
Join Date: May 2005
Location: COS
Posts: 8,554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I have purchased two front suspension MTBs in the past four years and have swapped the forks out for Surly rigids. I am rebuilding the Rock Shox Judy (from my Giant Rainier) and will be selling them, along with the Suntour XC60 (?) (from my Raleigh M50-DX). Just a preference - I like to 'feel' the road/trail
#28
Should be riding
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: C-dale- moutain, Pedal Force RS- Campy Record, Quiring Ti XTR, Red line Monocog, S E F@r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My next bike is going to be a rigid SS 29er. I think I got all the hot industry buzz words covered there. Oh wait, I'm sure I'll have some carbon fiber on there somewhere. There. Done.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Since then, I have found suspension forks really annoying. If I ever went back, it would be nothing but platform shocks with high blowoffs.
Beyond that, I think a lot of people like training on rigid singlespeeds because it teaches them about piloting the bicycle. So when the DO hop back on their tricked out race bikes, they are reacting as if they're on rigids and making their bikes more efficient.
Last edited by BearSquirrel; 02-12-08 at 05:58 PM.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 448
Bikes: 2000 Raleigh M50. 2006 Raleigh Rush Hour. 2008 Cannondale Synapse 6.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i ride a fully rigid 2000 M-50 with slick tires through the streets of NYC. accelerates well and is pretty nimble, a good setup to have in the city.
currently converting it into a 1x7 drivetrain. anyone else have any experience with this setup?
currently converting it into a 1x7 drivetrain. anyone else have any experience with this setup?
#31
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes. I ride a rigid Surly KM 29er. It's also a SS. I can see how a rigid bike would be bad for some situations. I only ride single track and the KM fits the bill quite nicely.
I wouldn't want to do it with a 26er. The big wheels coupled with lower tire pressure is all the suspension I feel that I need.
I wouldn't want to do it with a 26er. The big wheels coupled with lower tire pressure is all the suspension I feel that I need.
#32
Should be riding
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: C-dale- moutain, Pedal Force RS- Campy Record, Quiring Ti XTR, Red line Monocog, S E F@r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
x550x, that's what I'm hoping for too.
And the SS is for getting me additional leg strength by forcing me to work up hills instead of dropping a gear. The fact that it's rigid can change, although I'm looking forward to it.
I don't know if I agree 100% with the learning of a better line. With a suspension, it allows you to pick the quicker line, not necessarily the "best". The quicker line could be full of roots and stuff you wouldn't want your rigid to go over, yet with a suspension, it's no problem. YMMV.
And the SS is for getting me additional leg strength by forcing me to work up hills instead of dropping a gear. The fact that it's rigid can change, although I'm looking forward to it.
I don't know if I agree 100% with the learning of a better line. With a suspension, it allows you to pick the quicker line, not necessarily the "best". The quicker line could be full of roots and stuff you wouldn't want your rigid to go over, yet with a suspension, it's no problem. YMMV.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Quarantine
Posts: 238
Bikes: fixed gear raleigh super record, Fixed gear tall bike, SS tall bike, Triple high tall bike, Trek 4500, Diamond back viper, trek 800/nishiki chopper bike, I think/hope thats all
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yup full rigid and fixed gear!
#36
Time for a change.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
93 Kona Explosif- Project ll rigid forks. L/W steel frame and forks and it works. Climbing ability and rigid works. Downhills and you have to get used to riding out of the saddle and relaxed. Can't overtake the Full suspension bikes on the downhills-Which I could up to 2000- but can still shock them by staying close enough to them.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
#38
Bike Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times
in
27 Posts
Yeah, I have a rigid. It sits in the basement while I ride my suspension bikes. It's a really nice 96 Rockhopper in great shape. I don't ride it cause I just don't enjoy beating the crap out of myself.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#40
Too Much Crazy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660
Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I do
It is great fun and toughens you up!
Just another way to experience the trails.
It is great fun and toughens you up!
Just another way to experience the trails.
#41
Should be riding
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: C-dale- moutain, Pedal Force RS- Campy Record, Quiring Ti XTR, Red line Monocog, S E F@r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How do you like the CF fork? Mine's comming with a steel fork but I may end up putting a White Bro's on there (after trying out the steel for a while). Did you start with that or something else? If something else, then what was it and material?
#42
Too Much Crazy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660
Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I started with a vicious cycles rigid, non suspension corrected. I wanted a suspension corrected fork (what the frame was designed for), so I got the WB. No complaints with the WB fork at all. definately stiffer and lighter than the steel.
I will probably end up going back to a vicious cycles fork with the same ac height as the WB fork after 2 more years. I just can't see riding the WB fork for more than 3 hard years.
I think I prefer the look of the steel fork better and the ride is actually more compliant than the carbon.
Also, in my experience, there is a big difference between low end and high end steel forks.
I will probably end up going back to a vicious cycles fork with the same ac height as the WB fork after 2 more years. I just can't see riding the WB fork for more than 3 hard years.
I think I prefer the look of the steel fork better and the ride is actually more compliant than the carbon.
Also, in my experience, there is a big difference between low end and high end steel forks.
#43
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: long island ny
Posts: 6
Bikes: 86 procaliber, 83 mongoose mtb, 85 centirion elite, 07 stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
rigid man
still break out my original 86 procaliber often. Did buy a 06 stumpjumper hard tail on impulse, it's okay I guess,,, but wished i waited to order a proper Rigid from one of the handmade guys here in Northeast.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hanover PA
Posts: 940
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here too. (26") Rigid is the way to go. Different strokes for different folks.
Some things have changed, like cranks, levers, and saddle, but, rigid, and loved
Some things have changed, like cranks, levers, and saddle, but, rigid, and loved
Last edited by joetronic; 05-19-09 at 10:23 AM.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
i ride 2 full-rigids. one is a 26" 3x9; the other is a 29" ss/FG. I'm considering building a hardtail with front suspension, but i'm worried about the tuning/maintenance.
-rob
-rob
#49
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 29
Bikes: Schwinn collegiate, wanting a Bridgestone or Cannondale
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I always wanted to know if certain rigid frames with "switchback(?)" seat stays i.e. Nishiki Ariel/Alien are actually worthy for moderate mountain biking. I ride with sus, but I'm thinking of a fully rigid ride (except, maybe, for a sus stem). Bmalmquist, how do you get a 29 in a 1x1 fork? isn't the fork made for 26?
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
I think it's only natural that a neanderthal/luddite thread like this would attract a post by an individual named "biopacer"; we all probably saw that coming, somehow. But we could never expect him to be inquiring about switchback frames...
Now THAT's retro.
But, seriously, the full-rigid concept seems to be coming back in full-force, which is possibly a subconscious influence on my drive to try out a squishy fork. "Yeah, i decided to take it back to the old school; I'm gonna get me some suspension up front. A return to simpler times, i guess."
That'll be the day...
-rob
Now THAT's retro.
But, seriously, the full-rigid concept seems to be coming back in full-force, which is possibly a subconscious influence on my drive to try out a squishy fork. "Yeah, i decided to take it back to the old school; I'm gonna get me some suspension up front. A return to simpler times, i guess."
That'll be the day...
-rob