Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Suggested Bike Size?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Suggested Bike Size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-08 | 04:31 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 3
From: Orlando

Bikes: Trek Madone 6.9; Madone 5.1; Trek 6500 & Trek 1500

Suggested Bike Size?

I spend most of my time on a road bike, but have several buddies who are pretty heavy into Mountain Biking & keep giving me a hard time about getting out & joining them. I see most of miles still being on my road bike, but am trying to find a used bike that I can go out with them on. Something probably off Craigslist or ebay; somewhere I can get a full suspension bike with disc brakes for less than 1200 bucks.

Anyway, as I started my research on mountain bikes, I quickly discovered they are not sized the same way as road bikes. My roadie is 54cm & I have noticed they are in different increments (17.5? 19.5? etc). I know that a Large Cannondale is too big (my old mt. bike is a Cannondale-large & it is comfortable for around town, but just a little too big for riding hard in the mountains.). Also I realize the most popular answer is going to be go to LBS & get measured, but I am trying to save some money & definitely don't want a new bike. I am just looking for an idea of my size so I don't drive 2 hours to look at a bike that is way off the map as far as sizing.

Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.

Last edited by Porter20; 03-17-08 at 04:39 PM.
Porter20 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-08 | 05:13 PM
  #2  
Old School's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
From: Camino, CA

Bikes: Trek 5500 OCLV, Trek Fuel EX 9

As you have already discovered, road frames are sized in centimeters and mountain frames are sized in inches -- go figure. If you are comfortable on a 54cm road frame, my guess is that you should be looking at a 17-18" MTB. Much larger than that and you will not have the requisite clearance above the top tube to prevent possible injury to your manhood...
Old School is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-08 | 05:57 PM
  #3  
ProFail's Avatar
Generic Title
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina

Bikes: 2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog

Originally Posted by Old School
As you have already discovered, road frames are sized in centimeters and mountain frames are sized in inches -- go figure. If you are comfortable on a 54cm road frame, my guess is that you should be looking at a 17-18" MTB. Much larger than that and you will not have the requisite clearance above the top tube to prevent possible injury to your manhood...
Agreed.

I ride a 54cm Trek road frame and a 17.5" Trek MTB frame.

Manufacturers differentiate in sizing though.
__________________
Generic Joke
ProFail is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-08 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
Psycle chic's Avatar
.
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
This might be of help to you, thanks to good ol' Sheldon Brown.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-sizing.html
Psycle chic is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-08 | 06:14 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 3
From: Orlando

Bikes: Trek Madone 6.9; Madone 5.1; Trek 6500 & Trek 1500

Old School / ProFail

Thanks for the info. Exactly what I was looking for. I realize they will all be just a tad different, but with current gas prices I didn't want to drive 90 miles to try something that was going way too big or small. At least now I have a range.

And I do want to take care of the manhood!
Porter20 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-08 | 06:34 PM
  #6  
DirtPedalerB's Avatar
unofficial roadie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Out in the woods you see

Bikes: 2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike

on most models you can fit on 2 sizes it's just what your comfortable on ..mountain bikes are odd... the numbers sometimes don't represent the actual size of the frame .. that 17.5 inch trek fuel actually has a 16.5 inch seat tube.
DirtPedalerB is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-08 | 06:37 PM
  #7  
M_S
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 0
With modern ultra-compact frames standover becomes less of an issue, and what you want to pay attention to is TT length. Of course, that can also be effectively adjusted with stems and different setback seatposts. I love this about modern mountain bikes, it's way easier to shop used.
M_S is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-08 | 06:52 PM
  #8  
ProFail's Avatar
Generic Title
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina

Bikes: 2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog

Originally Posted by DirtPedalerB
on most models you can fit on 2 sizes it's just what your comfortable on ..mountain bikes are odd... the numbers sometimes don't represent the actual size of the frame .. that 17.5 inch trek fuel actually has a 16.5 inch seat tube.
Generally you want the smallest size you can fit on. According to other people, at least. I feel more secure on larger bikes.
__________________
Generic Joke
ProFail is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.