|
Here are the specs for the Trek:
SPECIFICATIONS Subject to change without notice. Spec Name Trek 4600 Frame Alpha SL aluminum Fork RockShox Judy TT, 80mm travel Headset Steel Rims/Wheels Matrix 750 Hubs Aluminum Spokes 14-gauge stainless-steel Tires Bontrager ACX, 26 x 2.2 Crankset Shimano Chainwheel 44/32/22 Bottom Bracket VP cartridge Chain Shimano Front Derailleur SR XCC-704 Rear Derailleur SRAM X.7 Rear Cogs SRAM, 9-speed: 11-34 Shifters SRAM X.7 Triggers Handlebars Bontrager Crowbar Sport Stem Bontrager AHS Brake Levers Promax aluminum Brakes Aluminum linear-pull Pedals Aluminum platform Saddle Bontrager Sport Seat Post Bontrager Sport |
I just brought home a Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo. I did some research online, and that is where all of the "find a bike for me" pages pointed me.
What are the opinions on this bike? I think it is pretty nice, and it fits well. I am going to have to practice with the clip in pedals a bit, and I had them set the springs a little on the soft side for the clips to begin with. I have ridden with the tow clips/straps before, but I think that there will still be a bit of a learning curve. Let me know what you think... By the way, I realize that my bike is over the $500 range, but I saw nno reason to make a seperate post about it. |
Originally Posted by nj03gti
I just brought home a Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo. I did some research online, and that is where all of the "find a bike for me" pages pointed me.
What are the opinions on this bike? I think it is pretty nice, and it fits well. I am going to have to practice with the clip in pedals a bit, and I had them set the springs a little on the soft side for the clips to begin with. I have ridden with the tow clips/straps before, but I think that there will still be a bit of a learning curve. Let me know what you think... By the way, I realize that my bike is over the $500 range, but I saw nno reason to make a seperate post about it. |
Originally Posted by nj03gti
Thanks for the reply. I went with that model because I didn't see a point in upgrading components a year or less after I got the bike. The pedals actually have a platform side that can be twisted out in the same manner you would twist out your foot. I plan on leaving them in and riding that way tomorrow. I agree that I need to get a good feel for the bike before jumping in with the clipless pedals. I am not a big fan of road rash, and I see no need to increase the odds of getting it. Until I am completely comfortable with the clipless pedals, I plan to leave the platform attached.
DO NOT use that platform adapter!!! That is what we in the industry call a "test ride" platform. It is not safe for continuous use. You can get a set of platforms fairly inexpensively to practice on and / or have as back ups. I can't stress this enough DON'T USE THE "TEST RIDE" PLATFORM! |
If I get the entry level Rockhopper or the 4300, can I assume that they can both be upgraded later to disc brakes?
Second part: Is the RH worth $80 more than the 4300. Sorry for the repeating some old questions, but I'm a roadie just trying to have some fun in the dirt. |
Originally Posted by tourist
If I get the entry level Rockhopper or the 4300, can I assume that they can both be upgraded later to disc brakes?
Second part: Is the RH worth $80 more than the 4300. Sorry for the repeating some old questions, but I'm a roadie just trying to have some fun in the dirt. In answer to your other question YES the Rockhopper is worth the extra $80. You get better drivetrain components a better fork and in my opinion a more upgradeable frame. Not to mention a LIFETIME warranty |
Hello :P
I'm pretty new too biking, I've got a CCM Riptide right now that i've had for a few years cause I wasn't really into biking for the last few years, but for the last 3 monthes I've been riding the piss out of it It's time for a new bike :P The bikes I've been looking at are the(all 2004 models) Trek 4500 Specialized Rockhopper Kona Fire Mountain All are within $50 of each other, so the price on them isnt really an issue. And having rode my CCM Riptide for the last 3 monthes through dirt, mud, snow, and pavement makes anything really ride like a dream. I havent test ridden any of them yet, but I will, but the store is 2 hours away(going to be moving to the city in fall, so warranty/lbs help isnt an issue) So I only have 1 crack to do this. My question is, if they all ride very similiarly, and I can't really tell much of a different, which should I buy? They're all great bikes, and would b e happy with any of them, from what I've learned from trolling around on this forum I'm thinking the rockhopper would probably be the best Thanks for the help/suggestions If i get any :D Oh yes, also, I'm 5'8" 180 right now, what size frame would you guys recommend? I know the Kona and Trek go 16-18-20 and the Specialized go 15-17-19(plz correct me if im wrong) I'm mostly going to be doing rough terrain trail riding with this, and commuting 8km round trips to school each day Thanks :D |
I just phoned the store too make sure they had all the bikes I was looking at in stock, but they only have the
Kona Fire Mountain Trek 4500 and they dont have any rockhoppers in :( But they have hardrock's in for about $150 cdn less than the other 2 bikes mentioned, he suggested I also try out a kona blast |
Originally Posted by wOo
Hello :P
I'm pretty new too biking, I've got a CCM Riptide right now that I've had for a few years cause I wasn't really into biking for the last few years, but for the last 3 months I've been riding the piss out of it It's time for a new bike :P The bikes I've been looking at are the(all 2004 models) Trek 4500 Specialized Rockhopper Kona Fire Mountain All are within $50 of each other, so the price on them isn't really an issue. And having rode my CCM Riptide for the last 3 months through dirt, mud, snow, and pavement makes anything really ride like a dream. I haven't test ridden any of them yet, but I will, but the store is 2 hours away(going to be moving to the city in fall, so warranty/lbs help isn't an issue) So I only have 1 crack to do this. My question is, if they all ride very similarly, and I can't really tell much of a different, which should I buy? They're all great bikes, and would b e happy with any of them, from what I've learned from trolling around on this forum I'm thinking the rockhopper would probably be the best Thanks for the help/suggestions If i get any :D Oh yes, also, I'm 5'8" 180 right now, what size frame would you guys recommend? I know the Kona and Trek go 16-18-20 and the Specialized go 15-17-19(please correct me if I'm wrong) I'm mostly going to be doing rough terrain trail riding with this, and commuting 8km round trips to school each day Thanks :D Edit Just noticed the Hardrock if you're talking about the Hardrock Comp model that's compareable to the other two bikes on your list if not then.... I'd hold out for the Rockhopper as it only takes a couple days to get bikes in. |
I'm new to the sport and I just bought a 2004 Haro Escape 8.1 for $499. I must say that I am thoroughly pleased. In the end it came down to the new 2005 base Rockhopper, the Hardrock comp, a Giant Yukon and a Fuji thrill. For the price, and value I could not pass up the Haro. Any thoughts on my decision?
|
I'm just about in the market for a new bike, since my 4 year old pos walmart bike is on its last legs, and I don't really know how much I should spend.
If I get it with most of my next paycheck, I can spend about $300-350; if I wait until the next, maybe $400-450. I like the specialized RockHopper, but would I really need that nice of a bike? :p Most of my riding is done on fairly good surfaces, nothing you couldn't drive a truck on. I'm almost 15 now, and 5'8 (weigh 130lb), and I'll probably grow a few inches, if I get a bike with room to grow, would it be bad for the time being? On another note, how much would I be looking at for a chain/lock system to lock the bike to a bike rack (it wouldn't be in a 'bad' neighborhood, so it doesn't have to be impossible to steal, but I don't just want to leave a large investment out for the taking. |
Originally Posted by MadMan2k
I'm almost 15 now, and 5'8 (weigh 130lb), and I'll probably grow a few inches, if I get a bike with room to grow, would it be bad for the time being?
As far as what model to get, I say get what you like and can afford. I ride with people on rockhoppers, and they are great bikes. I also ride with someone on a hardrock, and it is a great bike too. You should ride them both if you can, and see which one you like best. |
I just wanted to chime in on this, I recently bought a Trek 4600 and it is an incredibly good deal. Got mine for $450. It is a very tough bike, and a good spec for the money. The SRAM parts are awesome, the shifters are a fresh take on trigger shifting. The bike isn't on Treks website because it is a 2005 model. If this has already been explained, oh well.
|
Im planing on purchasing a bike but I haven't decided which one will be better for me, I was looking around the trek website and I found the 4500 WSD (Womens Specific Design) Im not really sure what the difference in the design is from the 4500 and I was wondering if anybody in here has one? I was also looking at the 7300 FX and the 3700, does anybody own any of those?
|
This should help explain W omen S pecific D esign http://www.teamestrogen.com/wsdBikes.asp
|
Hi. I'm also new to this sport, and glad I found this thread. Heres a little background.
I was in the market for a ~$300-350 entry level mountain bike. I rode a few around, and went to 6 different LBS. I am now stuck between the Hardrock Sport and the Trek 4300. I was getting ready to buy the Hardrock Sport, only thing stopping me was the ride position I was in. I felt a little too upright. My LBS told me that it can be fixed with another stem. So while that was going on. I went to another LBS and rode the new 2005 Trek 4300 but in a small 16" frame. I felt great on it. However, my test ride was on paved roads and hills. But now I am leaning towards that. I just wanted to throw that out in case someone should recommend otherwise. :) Here is the '05 4300 that I want. http://www.wtfhost.com/userfiles/will/43002.jpg |
Go for the hardrock sport, the change in stem will make a huge difference.
|
Originally Posted by KonaRider24
Go for the hardrock sport, the change in stem will make a huge difference.
|
Originally Posted by trekkie820
I just wanted to chime in on this, I recently bought a Trek 4600 and it is an incredibly good deal. Got mine for $450. It is a very tough bike, and a good spec for the money. The SRAM parts are awesome, the shifters are a fresh take on trigger shifting. The bike isn't on Treks website because it is a 2005 model. If this has already been explained, oh well.
How about some more info on the 4600? Do you have any pics? How about specs? |
Originally Posted by Ranger
How about some more info on the 4600? Do you have any pics? How about specs?
SRAM X.7 shifters and derailluer SR-Suntour front derailluer Bontrager Sport crankset, seatpost, saddle, Crowbar Bontrager Jones tires Matrix 750 wheels Aheadset Linear pull brakes(the pads suck ass) SRAM 9 speed cassette/chain RockShox Judy TT And, Trek's Alpha Aluminum frame I know I missed a few parts, but I couldn't be happier with mine. |
Originally Posted by KonaRider24
Go for the hardrock sport, the change in stem will make a huge difference.
Originally Posted by Raiyn
Agreed
Is there any reason why you would suggest the Specialized over the Trek? I am not sure about the specs and components on the 05' Specialized, but the 05' 4300 seems to have better components than the Hardrock, other than the 20mm of extra shock travel that the it has. Black = 05' 4300 (with disc brakes...but im getting the one without) Red = 04' Hardrock Sport FRAME: Alpha SL Aluminum High-strength A1 Premium Aluminum frame featuring forged dropouts with eyelets, reinforced disc mount, forged alloy FORK: RST Gila T5 w/preload adjust, 80mm RST Gilla T4, 100mm travel, preload adjust, Cr-Mo steerer, coil/MCU spring WHEELS: WHEELS: Shimano M495 disc hubs; WTB Speed Disc rims Joy-Tech, 32 hole, ground race double sealed loose ball w/ alloy QR; Alex double-wall rims with CNC braking surface TIRES: Bontrager ACX, 26x2.2", 52/54 Specialized Enduro Sport 26"x2.0" DRIVETRAIN: SHIFTERS: Shimano EF29 Shimano Altus FRONT DERAILLEUR: Shimano C050 Shimano Acera REAR DERAILLEUR: Shimano Alivio Shimano Acera CRANKSET: SR 42/34/24 Truvativ ISO-Flow CASSETTE: SRAM 850 11-32, 8 speed Shimano HG-50, PEDALS: Alloy platform, clipless adaptable Dual sided, composite body, steel cage, toe clip compatible |
Black = 05' 4300 (with disc brakes...but im getting the one without) Red = 04' Hardrock SportBlue My reply.
FRAME: Alpha SL Aluminum High-strength A1 Premium Aluminum frame featuring forged dropouts with eyelets, reinforced disc mount, forged alloyThat A1 Premium Aluminum frame with the forged dropouts with eyelets, reinforced disc mount, forged alloy is much stronger than that Alpha SL Aluminum. Trek doesn't forge dropouts which is why the majority of their bikes are v brake only. Forged is stronger than Non forged. FORK: RST Gila T5 w/preload adjust, 80mm RST Gilla T4, 100mm travel, preload adjust, Cr-Mo steerer, coil/MCU springBoth forks aren't the greatest, but the t4 is higher up on the RST foodchain. WHEELS: WHEELS: Shimano M495 disc hubs; WTB Speed Disc rims Joy-Tech, 32 hole, ground race double sealed loose ball w/ alloy QR; Alex double-wall rims with CNC braking surfaceWTB may make good tires and Saddles, but their rims downright stink. There have been more positive reviews with the Alex double-wall rims. TIRES: Bontrager ACX, 26x2.2", 52/54 Specialized Enduro Sport 26"x2.0"The Bontrager ACX's wear out very quickly. Specialized Enduro Sports do to but nowhere near the rate that the bontragers will. DRIVETRAIN: SHIFTERS: Shimano EF29 Shimano AltusEF29 is basically depot store level. Altus isn't. FRONT DERAILLEUR: Shimano C050 Shimano AceraC050 Depot store level. Acera is right above Depot store level. REAR DERAILLEUR: Shimano Alivio Shimano AceraAlivio used to be had for a lbs level, but has sunk to Depot Store level. Acera can't be found in Depot Stores. CRANKSET: SR 42/34/24 Truvativ ISO-Flow CASSETTE: SRAM 850 11-32, 8 speed Shimano HG-50,Sram 850 is Depot store stuff again. HG50 is actually Acera level. PEDALS: Alloy platform, clipless adaptable Dual sided, composite body, steel cage, toe clip compatibleThe only advantage the trek has but remember the pedals are usually the first thing to go so null point. Also when comparing bikes like you were, compare 2004's with 2004's and compare 2005's with 2005's. |
Originally Posted by Ranger
How about some more info on the 4600? Do you have any pics? How about specs?
http://bikebarn.com/site/itemdetails...=39&sort=Price |
Originally Posted by KonaRider24
Alivio used to be had for a lbs level, but has sunk to Depot Store level. Acera can't be found in Depot Stores.. |
Originally Posted by herkalees
Hey all, I joined this forum to ask this question and get your opinion:
I've narrowed down my search to the two bikes below, and I want your opinions on which I should choose based on my type of riding and which is a "better" all around bike. It will be 75% street riding (jumping off things, not-too-long distance riding, general cruising around) and 25% average dirt riding. I weigh 200 lbs and have a looooong history with mountain bikes... but that was about 7 years ago. 2003 Gary Fisher Tassajara (http://salemcycle.com/site/itemdetai...=39&sort=Price) without the disk brakes and only $550. or 2004 Hardrock Pro Disc (http://www.specialized.com/SBCBkModel.jsp?spid=6015) for $610 If you all need more information before you answer, ask away. Otherwise I appreciate all input. Thank you. Marc - http://www.vinimal.com |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.