Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Is Alivio as bad today as it was years ago?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Is Alivio as bad today as it was years ago?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-04, 06:24 PM
  #1  
I descend on my face
Thread Starter
 
Twitchology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Land of Milk and Hoppy.
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is Alivio as bad today as it was years ago?

I remember my beloved old Trek 830 in junior high - that bike was a tank, but the crappy Alivio derailleur always threw its chain under duress. Cut to current day and I'm looking at cheap mountain bikes, with all these new and crappier component options such as Altus, Acera, and *gasp* Tourney. I don't remember any of these being around when I bought my old Trek (stolen from me a couple of years ago). Perhaps I'm not up on my Shimano history. Has Alivio moved up the food chain with these new groups occupying the crappy spot, or is it the same quality it was years ago? If so, how poor do these lower component groups perform?
Twitchology is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 07:11 PM
  #2  
Scooby Snax
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I've got a beater that has Alivio, other than feeling a little more heavy handed than my LX shifters, It seems to work well. Shifts fine IMO.
 
Old 09-02-04, 07:32 PM
  #3  
Some guy
 
McGuillicuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
No, they aren't. Today's Alivio feels and looks alot like the STX I had on my last bike (before some worthless fluffer stole it!).
McGuillicuddy is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 09:43 PM
  #4  
I descend on my face
Thread Starter
 
Twitchology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Land of Milk and Hoppy.
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What are your folks' feelings on Altus and Acera?
Twitchology is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 10:09 PM
  #5  
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Technology trickles down. My feeling is that anything that is 7spd though is crap and shouldn't be bothered with since you can't upgrade to 8 or 9 due to the hub spacing.

Truthfully it all shifts fine, its just how you take care of it and if you know how to shift. I have a friend with some Alivio on a mid-nineties GT, and it was shifting like crap so he brought it to me. I replaced the chain, put the drivetrain in the dishwasher, straightened his derailleur hanger, replaced the cables, lubricated/cleaned out the housings and tweaked his limit screws.

Truthfully after that its hard to tell the difference between Alivio and LX, like I said, if you are shifting right. Definately give the upperhand on durability/smoothness to Deore/LX/XT/XTR however.
seely is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 10:24 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Tom Pedale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 537

Bikes: 2006 Specialized Tarmac Expert, 1990 Specialized Allez Epic, Specialized RockCombo (winter), 70's Motobecane Team Champion,

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Twitchology
What are your folks' feelings on Altus and Acera?

My experience in the cycling industry taught me that the cheaper Shimano drivetrains were not designed for heavy usage. This made sense since most of them were used by recreational riders that would not put a lot of miles on them. The best value was in the middle about the STX/LX range where you got reasonable weight, closer tolerances and better shifting without paying a big premium to save a few more ounces. Also, it was always easier to find a rear derailleur that shifted well vs. a front derailleur. I've often felt that if I was running derailleurs of different quality levels, on a mountain bike, I'd want the higher quality derailleur in front.
Tom Pedale is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 10:35 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
mindbogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 933
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by seely
put the drivetrain in the dishwasher
I hope you weren't cleaning plates at the same time.
mindbogger is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 10:39 PM
  #8  
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mindbogger
I hope you weren't cleaning plates at the same time.
Lol no... really is a great way to clean a crankset/chain/cassette though.
seely is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 10:46 PM
  #9  
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom Pedale
Also, it was always easier to find a rear derailleur that shifted well vs. a front derailleur. I've often felt that if I was running derailleurs of different quality levels, on a mountain bike, I'd want the higher quality derailleur in front.
Actually I'm going to have to disagree with you here a bit Tom. Its been my experience all front derailleurs are the same. They all are just a plain metal cage with a ramp, that just "mashes" the chain right or left. There really is no difference between a Deore/LX/XT/XTR front derailleur other than weight... operation is identical. So I see what you are saying about them shifting poorly but I don't think anyone could honestly notice a difference in shift quality between even a Deore and XTR front given that the mechanisms and construction are nearly identical, and how primitive the operation of a front derailleur is in the first place!
seely is offline  
Old 09-03-04, 05:13 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Parrish, FL
Posts: 7,963

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, the parrallel plate motion of the XTR is different, but I agree with you seely,

Between a Deore and and LX or Alivio or...... pretty much the same.

I have a Deore FD on my Enduro SX and an LX on my other bike.

L8R
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline  
Old 09-03-04, 08:20 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Tom Pedale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 537

Bikes: 2006 Specialized Tarmac Expert, 1990 Specialized Allez Epic, Specialized RockCombo (winter), 70's Motobecane Team Champion,

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by seely
Actually I'm going to have to disagree with you here a bit Tom. Its been my experience all front derailleurs are the same. They all are just a plain metal cage with a ramp, that just "mashes" the chain right or left. There really is no difference between a Deore/LX/XT/XTR front derailleur other than weight... operation is identical. So I see what you are saying about them shifting poorly but I don't think anyone could honestly notice a difference in shift quality between even a Deore and XTR front given that the mechanisms and construction are nearly identical, and how primitive the operation of a front derailleur is in the first place!
I think on a long term basis the action of pushing the chain across the bigger front chainrings is harder on the derailleur mechanism, so my feeling is that a better quality derailleur will work better longer. I agree that when the derailleurs are new or have reasonable mileage on them, the shift quality of various models does not vary significantly.
Tom Pedale is offline  
Old 09-04-04, 09:46 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My wife has a 2003 Alivio rear on her MTB, and I have 03/04 Deore and XT on my 2 MTB's. I ride her bike regularly for testing. IMHO- there's a much larger difference between the Alivio and Deore than between Deore and XT. Even when properly adjusted, the Alivio rear is just OK in shifting and requires more frequent adjustments than better Shimano rear deraileurs. In front- I think Alivio is only slightly inferior to Deore and XT. Keep in mind that the Alivio will not hold up as well as better components under hard riding conditions.
Midman is offline  
Old 09-04-04, 10:06 PM
  #13  
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234

Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by a2psyklnut
Well, the parrallel plate motion of the XTR is different
But that's only on the FD-M952. Anyone know why they dropped that feature for the M960 group? I have personally found that it does make for smoother and more reliable front shifting than LX or XT and was disappointed to see they didn't cary the technology forward. I actually think my front shifting on my MTB surpasses even the double chainring front shifting on my RB with Dura-Ace (FD-7700).
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.