Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

29er sizing issues

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

29er sizing issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-04 | 07:46 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Hello all!
Sorry to post yet another sizing thread, but this seems to be my best bet.
I am looking to purchase an '05 Gary Fisher X-Caliber and I'm torn between frame sizes. I'm just shy of 5'11" with an inseam of about 33.5". I cannot make up my mind as to whether to go with a 17.5"(M) or 19"(L) frame. I took a very brief testride on a 17.5" '03 model, and it seemed to feel alright with the seatpost most of the way out- better than the 17" Kona that I currently ride. I've also done my homework for the most part, and come to find out that Fisher has increased the standover on their hardtail 29ers by about an inch for each framesize. So as where I probably had 5 inches (give or take) of standover clearance on the medium '03, I would assume that i would have 4 or so inches on the '05 model. Bump that up to a large for the '05 model and thats about 3 inches of clearance. Maybe less if I'm mistaken on the clearance.
This is driving me crazy. I'm buying the bike through the store that I work at via Fisher's employee purchase program; In other words, if later on I decide that I've bought the wrong size, the option of exchanging sizes does not exist.
Let me also add that if I was purchasing a normal 26" wheeled bike, I think a large size frame would be my choice without much debate, since I have a fairly long inseam. With the 29ers, though, I don't know whether to stick with the framesize that I would on a regular wheeled bike, or to drop down one. I emailed Gary Fisher customer support, and they seemed like they didn't want to tell me the wrong thing, so instead they didn't really tell me much at all.
...maybe I'll get a unicycle instead. I think the geometry on them is a little easier to figure out.

Any input that you guys can throw my way would be greatly appreciated.

Last edited by JoelM; 10-09-04 at 07:57 PM.
JoelM is offline  
Reply
Old 10-09-04 | 10:10 PM
  #2  
seely's Avatar
The Rabbi
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Likes: 3
The 19" will probably be too big unless you have gorilla arms... Gary has a reputation for very long top tubes w/ a mid length stem. What you need to do is figure out your current bike's cockpit size (or get sized properly) and then look to see what size has a similar setup. If you look up Fisher's website you can get very detailed geometry and measurements off of there.

It sounds to me like you should be on a 17.5" if you are 5'10-ish since reach is far more important than inseam (they make longer seatposts, but you can't add/subtract top tube).

The idea behind compact geometry (sloping top tube) is that you only have to worry about reach and not standover (to an extent) resulting in a better fit... so if you have a good reach on the 17.5 but a lot of standover, the standover clearance should not sway your decision.
seely is offline  
Reply
Old 10-10-04 | 10:02 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Thanks much. The more I look around in these forums, the more it seems that people around my height are riding 17" frames, so I'm definitely leaning in that direction.
JoelM is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.