Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Fat Bikes Vs Regular Mt Bikes

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Fat Bikes Vs Regular Mt Bikes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-13 | 10:05 AM
  #26  
Banned.
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 426
Likes: 383
From: Land of Enhancement

Bikes: ...

There is this local diehard that does epic rides on his fatty. I see him during the summers riding it like a road bike. Maybe he's headed to the trails, but I've never seen him at any of the "usual" spots.
Bandrada is offline  
Reply
Old 12-29-13 | 01:05 PM
  #27  
sknhgy's Avatar
Banned.
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 428
From: Illinois
I would like to try one.
sknhgy is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-14 | 02:06 PM
  #28  
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Victoria bc

Bikes: 2016 Giant Comax Fastroad, 2013 Norco Bigfoot Fat Bike,

Huh?
69isfine is offline  
Reply
Old 01-16-14 | 09:29 AM
  #29  
bres dad's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 354
Likes: 10
From: Indiana

Bikes: '84 Paramount, '89 Schwinn 754, '13 Specialized RockHopper, Trek Domane 4.3

One of the LBS started carrying Surly fatties and I took one out for a quick spin. Though it was just down the alley (with the damn pot holes, its almost a technical trail as I had to navigate around the tail end of an F150 that was sticking out of the ground) when I got back, I was grinning ear to ear & the gal behind the corner laughed and said that was the most she'd every seen me smile. Can't really justify the price tag nor convince domestic management (my wife) but if I could find one deemed cheap, I'd jump on it. I wouldn't sell my regular MTB for one though as I see them as having two different purposes.

However if you're not real concerned about quality or weight and just want one to play with:
https://www.walmart.com/ip/26-Mongoos...-Bike/22861845
bres dad is offline  
Reply
Old 01-16-14 | 12:37 PM
  #30  
slowride454's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 519
Likes: 1
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix - Soma Double Cross Disc - Pivot Mach 429SL - Canfield Brothers Yelli Screamy - Specialized Carve SL - Trek Farley 7 - GT Dyno VFR

has anyone tried to put a fattie fork and wheel on a 29er frame? Maybe a 2.5r/3.8'f setup?
slowride454 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-16-14 | 01:00 PM
  #31  
dminor's Avatar
Moar cowbell
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 7
From: The 509

Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.

Originally Posted by bres dad
However if you're not real concerned about quality or weight and just want one to play with:
https://www.walmart.com/ip/26-Mongoos...-Bike/22861845
Hey if it's good enough for Manuel Beastly, it should be good enough for the rest of us, right?

__________________
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
dminor is offline  
Reply
Old 01-22-14 | 01:06 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Coastal GA

Bikes: Fuji Comp 29r, Downtube, Tommi Sea fat bike, Nashbar SS 29r half-fat, Full suspension mini-velo/MTB, Loopwheel M-Velo

Originally Posted by slowride454
has anyone tried to put a fattie fork and wheel on a 29er frame? Maybe a 2.5r/3.8'f setup?


P7HVN is offline  
Reply
Old 01-22-14 | 01:30 PM
  #33  
Banned.
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 426
Likes: 383
From: Land of Enhancement

Bikes: ...

Ok, so I've been riding a buddies Krampus w/3" tires for a few days. It's got a niche, for sure. The geo is almost perfect for my preferred application, which might be considered on the aggressive side of things. It's not quite as fast as my 26" sus, but totally predictable, and quite playful in the chunk. Where it does excel is on the climbs and in kitty litter/sandy. It's not the best application for rock crawling or slow plunking maneuvers, nor would does it really shine in tight singletrack.

I really liked the time I spent on it, and it would be a nice addition to the stable if I'm ever seriously start considering a 29'er for more backcountry applications. I did get in trouble with the mud as this frame was not meant to accommodate a 3" tire, and there were some chainline issues due to the tight tolerances. I snapped a rear d'er and had to make due with a single speed for the majority of the ride, but it was fine.











Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Krampus1.jpg (52.0 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg
Krampus2.jpg (97.6 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg
Krampus4.jpg (99.1 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg
Krampus6.jpg (98.1 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg
Krampus7.jpg (94.1 KB, 18 views)
Bandrada is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-14 | 12:15 AM
  #34  
slowride454's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 519
Likes: 1
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix - Soma Double Cross Disc - Pivot Mach 429SL - Canfield Brothers Yelli Screamy - Specialized Carve SL - Trek Farley 7 - GT Dyno VFR

I'm going to have to try this with the GT Karakoram frame for next winter. I see the older offset fatty forks for practically nothing these days. Maybe add some Tektro brakes and Nashbar components and have a cool winter beater.

Originally Posted by P7HVN


slowride454 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-14 | 08:36 AM
  #35  
Banned.
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 426
Likes: 383
From: Land of Enhancement

Bikes: ...

Originally Posted by slowride454
I'm going to have to try this with the GT Karakoram frame for next winter. I see the older offset fatty forks for practically nothing these days. Maybe add some Tektro brakes and Nashbar components and have a cool winter beater.
Add 3-4 inches travel out back, and that might be fun too!
Bandrada is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-14 | 11:53 PM
  #36  
Jiggle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 6
From: Somewhere in TX

Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon

I like the idea. Save the weight and complexity of shocks and gain the simplicity of bigger rubber and the added benefit of more traction.
Jiggle is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-14 | 03:21 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 255
Yeah but you really aren't saving any weight. Most fat bikes are well very fat.
Canker is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-14 | 01:05 PM
  #38  
modernjess's Avatar
ride for a change
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 2
From: Minneapolis, MN

Bikes: Surly Cross-check & Moonlander, Pivot Mach 429, Ted Wojcik Sof-Trac, Ridley Orion. Santa Cruz Stigmata

A lot of curiosity about Fat bikes these days. On problem is they are tough to find to demo for any length of time, and they are not cheap so making the leap of faith is tough to swallow.

It's a shame because assume all you want about Fat bikes but, until you spend some real time with one you can not truly understand just how versatile they are, how much fun they are, or whether they deserve a spot in your stable.
modernjess is offline  
Reply
Old 03-26-14 | 10:37 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Midcoast Maine

Bikes: Merlin Titanium serial #170 (29th road frame ever built, March '88), 1988 Cannondale Black Lightning, 2 fixed gear (46/17), Salsa El Kaboing fully mountain, Surly Pugsley modified

I have a Salsa fully I normally ride but came across a deal on a Pugsley with a cracked frame for insanely cheap, so I bought it. I upgraded the rear tire to a Nate and replaced the leaky rear brake caliper, and I haven't stopped riding it yet. It is WAY different from riding the Salsa, even with studded tires on it, and a whole lot more fun. Fun to the point I am considering selling the Salsa and staying Fat this summer as some local guys did.

The closest thing I can compare it to is driving a 4x4 truck vs driving a tractor. Yes, the 4x4 will get you there faster but on the tractor you just point and drive and it'll go through or over anything you want it to. Such is the way on the fattie.

My Pug weighs in at 38 pounds and the Salsa at 31 pounds, but you honestly don't notice the difference. Despite it having no suspension, I feel less of the trail and obstacles on the Pug than the Salsa, probably because the rolling diameter is a cushy 29+.

So it may replace my fully, I will make that determination this summer, but for the winter and spring (mud season) riding, there is no question it'll be the most used bike in my stable. I like it so much I haven't even been on the trainer at all this winter. We have a bunch of people locally that ride them, much more than used to go out in winter. The guys on the skinny tire bikes struggle a lot of the time.


hikerinmaine is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-15 | 09:00 AM
  #40  
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
2014-03-21-14.17.17.jpg (110.2 KB, 17 views)
tonychen is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MarcusT
Mountain Biking
12
07-29-17 06:57 AM
TiHabanero
Mountain Biking
6
01-17-16 09:13 AM
CanadianBiker32
Mountain Biking
10
06-22-15 02:37 PM
Commodus
Commuting
84
12-12-13 08:00 PM
jethro56
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
7
02-01-11 05:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.