Bike New York: 5 Boro Ride?
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
191 Posts
This will be my 11th year doing it. I have always done it on a mountain bike. I have seen way too many people crash on a road bike. The bridge expansions can be a nightmare on skinny tires, not to mention if it rain it can get really slick.
It is an epic ride, mostly because of the ~32K people that show up. Once you get to the BQE you will be riding with more experienced people. All the slower people stay behind near Queens.
Can't wait!
It is an epic ride, mostly because of the ~32K people that show up. Once you get to the BQE you will be riding with more experienced people. All the slower people stay behind near Queens.
Can't wait!
Onward...
#28
Senior Member
When I saw the price I decided NOT to ride.
#30
Senior Member
For me the deal-breaker is the restriction on bags.
Every day thousands of drivers clog the streets, and no one restricts what they can carry. But on the one day when bikes predominate on some streets, then we're somehow more suspect? This is offensive.
I had actually paid to participate in this thing in 2013; it would have been my first organised tour. But then I didn't go, purely out of disgust with the new bag regulations. I first had several arguments demanding my money back. They changed the bag rule after the original refund deadline. If they are going to change the rules that affect the conditions of the ride, they have the obligation to extend the deadline for refunds. But they refused, a stance which I find completely unacceptable.
After I could not obtain a refund, I just blew the whole thing off. Despite having paid, I wasn't going to fall for the "sunk costs" fallacy, whereby people keep pouring their resources into something solely on the grounds that they have already put something in. These turds already had my money; I wasn't about to lose time on top of that.
They can keep their ride. I have been perfectly content to do my own self-styled tours.
Every day thousands of drivers clog the streets, and no one restricts what they can carry. But on the one day when bikes predominate on some streets, then we're somehow more suspect? This is offensive.
I had actually paid to participate in this thing in 2013; it would have been my first organised tour. But then I didn't go, purely out of disgust with the new bag regulations. I first had several arguments demanding my money back. They changed the bag rule after the original refund deadline. If they are going to change the rules that affect the conditions of the ride, they have the obligation to extend the deadline for refunds. But they refused, a stance which I find completely unacceptable.
After I could not obtain a refund, I just blew the whole thing off. Despite having paid, I wasn't going to fall for the "sunk costs" fallacy, whereby people keep pouring their resources into something solely on the grounds that they have already put something in. These turds already had my money; I wasn't about to lose time on top of that.
They can keep their ride. I have been perfectly content to do my own self-styled tours.
#31
Senior Member
For me the deal-breaker is the restriction on bags.
Every day thousands of drivers clog the streets, and no one restricts what they can carry. But on the one day when bikes predominate on some streets, then we're somehow more suspect? This is offensive.
I had actually paid to participate in this thing in 2013; it would have been my first organised tour. But then I didn't go, purely out of disgust with the new bag regulations. I first had several arguments demanding my money back. They changed the bag rule after the original refund deadline. If they are going to change the rules that affect the conditions of the ride, they have the obligation to extend the deadline for refunds. But they refused, a stance which I find completely unacceptable.
After I could not obtain a refund, I just blew the whole thing off. Despite having paid, I wasn't going to fall for the "sunk costs" fallacy, whereby people keep pouring their resources into something solely on the grounds that they have already put something in. These turds already had my money; I wasn't about to lose time on top of that.
They can keep their ride. I have been perfectly content to do my own self-styled tours.
Every day thousands of drivers clog the streets, and no one restricts what they can carry. But on the one day when bikes predominate on some streets, then we're somehow more suspect? This is offensive.
I had actually paid to participate in this thing in 2013; it would have been my first organised tour. But then I didn't go, purely out of disgust with the new bag regulations. I first had several arguments demanding my money back. They changed the bag rule after the original refund deadline. If they are going to change the rules that affect the conditions of the ride, they have the obligation to extend the deadline for refunds. But they refused, a stance which I find completely unacceptable.
After I could not obtain a refund, I just blew the whole thing off. Despite having paid, I wasn't going to fall for the "sunk costs" fallacy, whereby people keep pouring their resources into something solely on the grounds that they have already put something in. These turds already had my money; I wasn't about to lose time on top of that.
They can keep their ride. I have been perfectly content to do my own self-styled tours.
#32
Senior Member
Furthermore, even if this nonsensical rule was forced on the organisers of this tour, they should have done the decent thing by allowing refunds for a short time right after the imposition of the new rule.
#33
Senior Member
Your missing the point it's the event that draws the attention. It's mass amounts of people in one spot, they don't care about single cars it's about mass destruction and headlines.
But you are right and they should have refunded the money.
But you are right and they should have refunded the money.
#34
Senior Member
I'm pretty sure the bag rules were imposed on the organizers by the police. However, smaller bags, like handlebar bags, are fine.
Last year the weather was nothing short of spectacular. Hoping for another weekend like that this year.
Last year the weather was nothing short of spectacular. Hoping for another weekend like that this year.
#35
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Garden State
Posts: 194
Bikes: 2009 BMC Team Machine, 2012 Jamis Supernova
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
There was an incident in Times Square in 2010:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_T...ombing_attempt
One vehicle, illegally parked in Times Square, no event. Potential mass destruction.
I'm not taking sides on this, but they should have refunded your entry fee.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_T...ombing_attempt
One vehicle, illegally parked in Times Square, no event. Potential mass destruction.
I'm not taking sides on this, but they should have refunded your entry fee.
#36
Senior Member
Similarly, the bags of bicyclists boarding the Staten Island Ferry are subjected to bomb-sniffing dogs. Meanwhile, people walking on with the same sorts of bags do not have to endure this.
It is important to understand that there is nothing legitimate going on here, in either of these cases. The aforementioned policies are simply manifestations of society's relationship to bicyclists as a class; this is proof that we remain a marginalised group and not part of the mainstream.
My beef about the bag restriction is with authorities for their irrationally discriminatory treatment of bicyclists in the name of "security" (which is the catch-all justification for every police-state measure imaginable), and, more fundamentally, with the American public for its insanely exaggerated fear of mostly imaginary "terrorism".
With the organisers of the Five Boro Bike Tour my beef is about their refusal to give refunds after the new bag restriction came in.
#37
Senior Member
My beef about the bag restriction is with authorities for their irrationally discriminatory treatment of bicyclists in the name of "security" (which is the catch-all justification for every police-state measure imaginable), and, more fundamentally, with the American public for its insanely exaggerated fear of mostly imaginary "terrorism".
#38
Senior Member
I was trying to put a team together but by the time I got my registration confirmation, standard registration was FULL! It was only open for 3 days. Needless to say, none of my buddies want to pony up $300 to go, so it'll be another solo ride for me.
#39
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7353 Post(s)
Liked 2,481 Times
in
1,440 Posts
@Hokiedad4, maybe you can make friends while you're there. Or put out a notice to all of your friends, asking if anyone else is registered and going.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ooompa Loompa
Road Cycling
19
06-27-12 06:47 PM