Benefit of "marking" or going after attacker?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Benefit of "marking" or going after attacker?
Ok - on Saturday we all saw that Lance was all alone with no support and the comments made on TV (and here) were that he needed his team to counter the attacks of Vino, etc. I don't understand this - why does having someone other than lance go after a breakaway attack hurt the attack? It doesn't slow down the attacker . . .
For example, suppose Paolo and Lance are together with Vino and Ulrich and Vino attacks and heads off. Supposedly Paolo would go after him to 'reel him in' but having Paolo go after Vino does not slow him down at all. Why would Vino care if Paolo came after him as long as Lance didn't? He would still put time into Lance - regardless of whether or not Paolo chases him. . .what am I mising here. . .?
Adam
For example, suppose Paolo and Lance are together with Vino and Ulrich and Vino attacks and heads off. Supposedly Paolo would go after him to 'reel him in' but having Paolo go after Vino does not slow him down at all. Why would Vino care if Paolo came after him as long as Lance didn't? He would still put time into Lance - regardless of whether or not Paolo chases him. . .what am I mising here. . .?
Adam
#2
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Towson, MD
Posts: 4,020
Bikes: 2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lance needed another Discovery boy to pace him and break wind for him (most team leaders have a designated teammate to ride infront of them and break wind. I suspect Hincappie is Lance's windbreak). If Lance had a teammate when Vino attacked, the teammate would have set pace.
The team mate will increase his pace and try to catch the attack, shielding the team leader to reduce the team leader's effort. Eventually, the team leader will have to work for himself, but the domestiques are supposed to delay that point as long as possible.
The team mate will increase his pace and try to catch the attack, shielding the team leader to reduce the team leader's effort. Eventually, the team leader will have to work for himself, but the domestiques are supposed to delay that point as long as possible.
#3
Banned
Actually the whole discovery team is LA's windbreak, thats their job, they screwed up by not being around,plus LA will always have that boat anchor Ullrich glued to his wheel as well.In a typical TDF Armstrong will draft for about 98% of it, the only time you will see him breakway is at the base of the final climb, or in a TT, thats the formula they use,and so far nobody else has been able to match or beat it.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,372
Bikes: Lemond Alpe d´Huez, Scott Sub 10, homemade mtb, Radlbauer adler (old city bike), Dahon impulse (folder with 20 inch wheels), haibike eq xduro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I couldnt really understand the importance that the pros like Armstrong give to these break away moves by the competition-as long as you have a good fast team you surely shouldn't have to worry about what your competitors are doing at all- just blast away as fast as you can and protect your fastest rider so he can get the quickest time- they must know by now more or less what the competion can do and more or less what they have to do to win
__________________
only the dead have seen the end of mass motorized stupidity
Plato
(well if he was alive today he would have written it)
only the dead have seen the end of mass motorized stupidity
Plato
(well if he was alive today he would have written it)
#5
Banned
Originally Posted by royalflash
I couldnt really understand the importance that the pros like Armstrong give to these break away moves by the competition-as long as you have a good fast team you surely shouldn't have to worry about what your competitors are doing at all- just blast away as fast as you can and protect your fastest rider so he can get the quickest time- they must know by now more or less what the competion can do and more or less what they have to do to win
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One key way it is useful to have teammates heading up a final climb with you such as was the case this weekend is; That teammate will set such a tempo that attacks can not be made, while still providing a wheel for Lance. Eki, Ace, and Landis have done a great job of this in the past and are the reason why a situation such as Sat. hs not played out time after time, I can only recall such a situation one other time when attacks were as fast and furious.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ashland, VA
Posts: 1,344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by royalflash
I couldnt really understand the importance that the pros like Armstrong give to these break away moves by the competition-as long as you have a good fast team you surely shouldn't have to worry about what your competitors are doing at all- just blast away as fast as you can and protect your fastest rider so he can get the quickest time- they must know by now more or less what the competion can do and more or less what they have to do to win
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by acrafton
Ok - on Saturday we all saw that Lance was all alone with no support and the comments made on TV (and here) were that he needed his team to counter the attacks of Vino, etc. I don't understand this - why does having someone other than lance go after a breakaway attack hurt the attack? It doesn't slow down the attacker . . .
For example, suppose Paolo and Lance are together with Vino and Ulrich and Vino attacks and heads off. Supposedly Paolo would go after him to 'reel him in' but having Paolo go after Vino does not slow him down at all. Why would Vino care if Paolo came after him as long as Lance didn't? He would still put time into Lance - regardless of whether or not Paolo chases him. . .what am I mising here. . .?
Adam
For example, suppose Paolo and Lance are together with Vino and Ulrich and Vino attacks and heads off. Supposedly Paolo would go after him to 'reel him in' but having Paolo go after Vino does not slow him down at all. Why would Vino care if Paolo came after him as long as Lance didn't? He would still put time into Lance - regardless of whether or not Paolo chases him. . .what am I mising here. . .?
Adam
Now with a teammate or two.
Someone jumps. The teammate chases him down, but not quite as quickly and being sure Lance gets his wheel. Lance uses a little extra energy, but not all that much. 3 or 4 attacks down the road that teammate can not catch the guy, but Lance is 3 or 4 attacks ahead. (With good communication Lance may chase down number 3 himself letting his teammate rest then perhaps teammate does the work fot the next 2).
Just having the teammate decreases the chances of an attack.
Then there are the non contenders. If one of them goes Lance really does not want to chase, no tworth the energy. But once gone there is a risk. If later a contender gets away and catches the non contender up the road they will work as a team. If Lance has a team mate cover the non contender it does two things. First the non contender is hopin for a stage win, with someone else sitting on his wheel he is unlikely to get it and may decide the effort is no longer worht it. If he does continue Lance also has his teammate as help up the road, and Lance's help is the fresher rider.
#9
34x25 FTW!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,013
Bikes: Kona Jake, Scott CR1, Dahon SpeedPro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Another, more subtle details to consider is that having a teammate with you increases the size of the group in a favorable way. Consider the extereme case of finishing at the back of the bunch in a big group finish -- the rider still gets the same time. Having a teammate or two to initiate the chase of an escaping opponent gives the the rider a little extra time to react. Small, but I think, ultimately useful. In addition, the teammate provides a little bit of a draft even uphill which would not be there if the opponent's break was well-timed. This stuff can add-up, IMO.
Anyhow, I think it's mostly psychological.
One more thing, you all have to remember that most attacks involve going anaerobic. Speed is not linearly related to your effort. You use up something 18x as much resources per unit of energy produced (yes, going anerobic is very inefficient). This adds all sorts of complications. The rest is left to the student.
Anyhow, I think it's mostly psychological.
One more thing, you all have to remember that most attacks involve going anaerobic. Speed is not linearly related to your effort. You use up something 18x as much resources per unit of energy produced (yes, going anerobic is very inefficient). This adds all sorts of complications. The rest is left to the student.