trike wheel size????
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 650
Bikes: 2 Centurian Ironman, Rossin Genisis, Greenspeed GT3, Stowaway (wife)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
trike wheel size????
I am an old road bike rider and I am currently looking at recumbent trikes. Catrike to be specific. I like the idea of the folding version but knowing nothing about trikes, I am curious if the 700c rear wheel is not better than the small 20" rear wheel on the folding version. I would also like to get the wife on a trike since she can't ride a bike. I am concerned about the different rear wheel size. Thanks for your thoughts
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 51
Bikes: RANS Tailwind
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The larger the rear tire, the less takeoff power, and slower to get going, but faster on the top end, in my opinion. If you plan on just cruising around, you would be better off with the 20 rear. Especially if you want folding. Catrike has a 559 with a 26 rear that folds nicely. I have a 26 rear, and I like to go fast as I can to stay up with my wife on a two wheeler. I'm learning that fast and trike don't go together. My average speed over 22 miles this morning was a little under 10 MPH. I working to get to 12 Avg. Only been on the trike 10 days. I think I'll make it soon. Good luck!
#3
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
I went to a 26" rear wheel to get the chain and RD further up out of the dirt. I changed gearing to keep the low gear gearing manageable.
#4
Banned
3_ 20" Wheels also means just 1 spare tube and tire
Rohloff IGH in my 20" wheel* and even the chain tensioner can be short . for plenty of ground clearance.
a 34:15 is going to be lower because of the wheel size but not into the warrantee voiding Low-low,
for high there can be a 2 chainring set,
or the Schlumpf Speed drive, its internal Overdrive gear Functions like a 54t when engaged.
* my bike friday bike, I run a 16:53 .. It's like the 16:38 in a 26" wheel
Rohloff IGH in my 20" wheel* and even the chain tensioner can be short . for plenty of ground clearance.
a 34:15 is going to be lower because of the wheel size but not into the warrantee voiding Low-low,
for high there can be a 2 chainring set,
or the Schlumpf Speed drive, its internal Overdrive gear Functions like a 54t when engaged.
* my bike friday bike, I run a 16:53 .. It's like the 16:38 in a 26" wheel
Last edited by fietsbob; 07-09-15 at 02:45 PM.
#5
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
But------------with a 20 inch rear wheel in some gears the tension wheel on the RD is only a couple of inches off the ground. The spinning wheel blows dirt right on to the chain. Then is there is grass and weeds where you ride, they too get caught up in the RD and chain. As I stated above I went to a 26" rear wheel to get the chain and RD further up out of the dirt and trash.
Additionally with the 26" rear wheel, you can pretty much use standard mountain bike gearing and cassettes.
Additionally with the 26" rear wheel, you can pretty much use standard mountain bike gearing and cassettes.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 650
Bikes: 2 Centurian Ironman, Rossin Genisis, Greenspeed GT3, Stowaway (wife)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the replys fellas....I am well aware that the wheel size greatly affects the overall gear ratio. I did not consider the dirt accumulation on the drive train by it being closer to the road/ground which is a good point. I guess my thought was if the larger wheel will allow less rolling resistance than the smaller wheel and is the difference really noticeable. Since that concern has not been mentioned I kinda assume that it is of no issue.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
You really need to evaluate the entire trike as an entity. Everything on a bike (or a trike) works together so you can never change just one part without it affecting something else.
If the folding feature is important to you either for transportation or for storage, that usually means smaller wheels. A few years ago Mrs. Grouch and I went shopping for a trike that she could fit inside of her car. The limiting factor turned out to be her Saturn's trunk height. A folding Greenspeed GT with 16" wheels did, however, fit. Anything with 20" or larger wheels, even folded, was just too high.
Most people will say, and I agree, that bigger diameter wheels will roll a little bit more easily. I think that it's because they provide a more gradual ramp over all the bumps. Aside from that speed is a function of the power the rider is able to produce and gearing. Gearing is easy to adjust. I've got 60/50/39 chainrings on my SWB Rans rocket with 20" wheels and it shifts great.
I can see why people fret about the derailleur arm hanging too low and I suppose that we'll hear from somebody who has had a bad experience with that but, it hasn't happened to Me or Mrs. Grouch, and I've not talked personally with anybody who has had first hand experience with that. It never happened with Mrs. Grouch's 16" wheeled Greenspeed and it hasn't happened with our Kettweisel deltas which have 20" wheels and the derailleur centered between the two rear wheels. We live only 2 miles from the crushed limestone Katy Trail so we do a lot of dusty environment riding and I haven't felt the need to do any more derailleur pulley maintenance than I have with any other bike. I don't worry about it anymore but I don't try to straddle big logs with our Kett-train either.
If the folding feature is important to you either for transportation or for storage, that usually means smaller wheels. A few years ago Mrs. Grouch and I went shopping for a trike that she could fit inside of her car. The limiting factor turned out to be her Saturn's trunk height. A folding Greenspeed GT with 16" wheels did, however, fit. Anything with 20" or larger wheels, even folded, was just too high.
Most people will say, and I agree, that bigger diameter wheels will roll a little bit more easily. I think that it's because they provide a more gradual ramp over all the bumps. Aside from that speed is a function of the power the rider is able to produce and gearing. Gearing is easy to adjust. I've got 60/50/39 chainrings on my SWB Rans rocket with 20" wheels and it shifts great.
I can see why people fret about the derailleur arm hanging too low and I suppose that we'll hear from somebody who has had a bad experience with that but, it hasn't happened to Me or Mrs. Grouch, and I've not talked personally with anybody who has had first hand experience with that. It never happened with Mrs. Grouch's 16" wheeled Greenspeed and it hasn't happened with our Kettweisel deltas which have 20" wheels and the derailleur centered between the two rear wheels. We live only 2 miles from the crushed limestone Katy Trail so we do a lot of dusty environment riding and I haven't felt the need to do any more derailleur pulley maintenance than I have with any other bike. I don't worry about it anymore but I don't try to straddle big logs with our Kett-train either.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 650
Bikes: 2 Centurian Ironman, Rossin Genisis, Greenspeed GT3, Stowaway (wife)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It sure sounds like 20 inchers all round is quite workable and I see no problem with a 90" top gear to be a problem with a tad unless they are faster than a DF . I seldom use much over 80' gears on my DF. I coast down hill most of the time. The CT has a 52-12 top gear which for this old feller is probably plenty. I took a short ride on a Terra a couple of days ago and I never got to the 42-12 in a large parking lot, course my body hasn't developed correctly for the riding position either.
#9
Old Fart In Training
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
I hopped off the sidewalk at an angle crossing over it once with my 20" wheels on my EZ-1.
The drop of less than 3 inches down Into the grass was Instantly fatal for My RD...
Sure It was my fault.
It was not expensive but the hour walk home In the heat was not much fun...
Not a concern on my Tour Easy with Its 700c rear wheel...
The drop of less than 3 inches down Into the grass was Instantly fatal for My RD...
Sure It was my fault.
It was not expensive but the hour walk home In the heat was not much fun...
Not a concern on my Tour Easy with Its 700c rear wheel...
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 61
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tire size and width plays a massive role in how comfortable a bicycle/trike is to ride. The air filled tire itself acts as a form of suspension, the larger the total air volume, the better the tire is at absorbing shocks (assuming the tire is filled to the ideal PSI). There is a pro and con here to weigh. A larger tire is heavier, but it also rolls better. Hard to say how it all works out, lighter is nicer up a hill, but a softer ride is nicer 100% of the time. Personally, I lean towards wider tires. I actually didn't really understand or realize this was an issue until I got my first recumbent bicycle which had very narrow tires on it, I had always ridden mountain bikes with at least 2" wide tires, plenty soft and comfortable ride.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 650
Bikes: 2 Centurian Ironman, Rossin Genisis, Greenspeed GT3, Stowaway (wife)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have settled on the small wheels. I have one that has 16" and the wife will soon have one with 20". We will see how it goes. I will say it is quite hilly here and low gear is probably far more important than a big inch on the top end. One must get up the hill before getting to go fast down the hill. I see not curbs in our future. Now chuck holes are another issue all together.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SunnyFlorida
Bicycle Mechanics
2
02-09-11 02:49 PM