![]() |
Originally Posted by Offhoff
Yeah Britain was weird because you have to retrain to drive on the wrong side of everything, damn backwards british. I loved just about everywhere else in Europe, especially Vienna. Nothing like getting hit on by really really hot Austrian girls on a bike (come on Toronto girls get with the program!) Though I have to admit the cobblestones did get a little jarring after awhile.
|
Originally Posted by gboy
Had fun biking down to the Hart House breakfast, and then found out about the grassroots breakfast on bloor/brunswick ave.; so I had both. And then elevensies at the bagel stop at college/beverly. Hmm, I;ll probably be riding around town later today, and might still go for the 8pm CV...
|
Originally Posted by somnambulant
I might be interested. Depends on how zonked I am from the velodrome on Saturday. :)
P.S Way to suck server. |
YO! sr20det look what I found on another forum I frequent.
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/331/sr20det5rq.gif |
Originally Posted by operator
Ditto
P.S Way to suck server. |
Originally Posted by jeremywhitehorn
oh yeah, i forgot to mention that there is a fixed ride happening this sunday AM, starting at 10 from Balzac's Roastery (in the distillery district); 100km or so, social pace. so far some of the toronto fixed group are showing up so who here is interested?
Definitely interested. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by jeremywhitehorn
(pun intended).
|
Originally Posted by operator
*explodes
|
Originally Posted by Offhoff
Its the exact reason why, even with the vastly lower property values, total cost of living is actually more expensive in the suburbs especially once you have kids of driving age. The entire amount of money I spend on my bike in a year wouldn't put a dent in what my car insurance would be. I think what will be most interesting in Toronto is the change to higher density housing. Besides rosedale, single family dwellings are going to become a rarity in downtown Toronto over the next 20 years.
higher density housing is silly, but i guess there is no way around it now with the escalading cost of land and also the fact that developers are no longer allowed to develop new land. housing with a small footprint but rise high up are....still small. i dont care how many square feet it actually is! each floor is miniscule!! and u have to scale flights of stairs to get anywhere. d'ah well. what can you do? |
Originally Posted by somnambulant
I kept an eye out for you at the Hart House one, but I didn't see you. What time were you there? I was there from probably around 8:15 - 8:45.
|
56cm bianchi.. 100 bucks!
http://toronto.craigslist.org/bik/168929327.html nice beater... operator, i'd buy it for you if you were my girlfriend. |
Originally Posted by boroSS
higher density housing is silly, but i guess there is no way around it now with the escalading cost of land and also the fact that developers are no longer allowed to develop new land. housing with a small footprint but rise high up are....still small. i dont care how many square feet it actually is! each floor is miniscule!! and u have to scale flights of stairs to get anywhere. d'ah well. what can you do?
Oh well, I guess it's just not a "toronto thing". :P I think modern architecture like that (big windows, lots of light, etc) is probably happier in a hilly area anyway because of the views and "natural privacy" (homes behind you are downhill and therefore can't see into the back of your house) afforded by building on the side of a hill. The only real hills in toronto are the ravines which are either protected (rightfully so) and/or prohibitively expensive. I'll point to http://www.livemodern.com/, even though they appear to be having server issues right now. :) http://www.cdnarchitect.com/issues/I...262006&btac=no http://www.vanartgallery.bc.ca/exhib...fabricated.cfm Of course, at this stage I'm living in a 1-bdrm apartment so I guess I shouldn't worry too much about not being able to have my perfect modern home, should I? Patience Wesley, patience! :) edit for fixie content: http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive...gear_bike.html |
I've got a front and back yard, two off street parking spaces and a fully detached house. I'm livin' large except that any changes to the house have to be approved. This takes forever and is very restrictive. In Toronto apparently new houses have to reflect the character of the older houses, so no buying a lot on an old street and plunking in a super modern solar/wind powered house. Seems a shame, there are alot of good housing solutions that people are simply not allowed to experiment with.
|
Originally Posted by TRaffic Jammer
YO! sr20det look what I found on another forum I frequent.
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/331/sr20det5rq.gif its actually a pretty popular japanese plush toy/character called domo-kun. |
that gif CAN be used as an avatar if you want
|
Originally Posted by somnambulant
I just wish there was room to build a house in Toronto without being stupid rich enough to buy a house and tear it down just for the property. :) I'd love to live in a house designed with modern architecture that takes things like sustainability, environmental impact and efficiency into account. The likelyhood of finding something like that in Toronto is slim, and the ability to build it is pretty much nil.
Oh well, I guess it's just not a "toronto thing". :P I think modern architecture like that (big windows, lots of light, etc) is probably happier in a hilly area anyway because of the views and "natural privacy" (homes behind you are downhill and therefore can't see into the back of your house) afforded by building on the side of a hill. The only real hills in toronto are the ravines which are either protected (rightfully so) and/or prohibitively expensive. I'll point to http://www.livemodern.com/, even though they appear to be having server issues right now. :) http://www.cdnarchitect.com/issues/I...262006&btac=no http://www.vanartgallery.bc.ca/exhib...fabricated.cfm Of course, at this stage I'm living in a 1-bdrm apartment so I guess I shouldn't worry too much about not being able to have my perfect modern home, should I? Patience Wesley, patience! :) edit for fixie content: http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive...gear_bike.html |
Originally Posted by boroSS
higher density housing is silly, but i guess there is no way around it now with the escalading cost of land and also the fact that developers are no longer allowed to develop new land.
|
Originally Posted by gokiburi
56cm bianchi.. 100 bucks!
http://toronto.craigslist.org/bik/168929327.html operator, i'd buy it for you if you were my girlfriend. |
I'm bailing out tonight (probably) because after several false alarms, I am actually getting kittens. I might show up if everything's done with by 8 though, so you guys should still meet at Honest Ed's so that I can show up. Otherwise, someone PM me a cell phone number to call to find you. Kittens!
|
Boo hiss?
|
Kittens!
|
Originally Posted by Shiznaz
What gives you that idea? The majority of development is on 'green' land these days, as it has always been. the GTA's suburbs are growing at the fastest pace ever despite loophole filled legislation designed to curb urban sprawl. Density doesn't mean building sky-scrapers, it means using what land you already have in a more efficient manner. This would mean building in deindustrialized brown fields (the don lands), improving substandard housing (regent park)and the transportation network to deal with a more densely arranged population. Its about building mixed use neighbourhoods that are self sufficient, turning bedroom communities into fully fledged neighbourhoods. This city has so much space to rationlize outside of the downtown core as well; the inner suburbs should be where we look to increase density rather than already functionally sustainable downtown neighbourhoods.
additionally, the whole higher density building thing is out of whack. i agree with what you have to say, but all new homes/townhomes/appartments are entirely different from those of yesteryear (and have not been built in an efficient manner). look at how much smaller everything has gotten. a step into any new condo development will show you just that. sure, they are larger buildings...but typically smaller units. i personally just moved to a new development in the yonge/yorkmills are and my home is something like 2000sq ft--but it has 5 floors. so yes, they are fitting more homes into a smaller space...and yes, it is 2000sq ft. but it doesnt help that virtually every floor is a mere 400 feet :D anywhoo...who cares? it's all about cycling! |
Originally Posted by 32flavours
Kittens!
|
So who is going to CV
|
if your going to ride you should go tonight there is wierd weather Thurs/Fri
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.