MapMyRide or Strava?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 997
Likes: 61
From: Western NC mountains
Bikes: Trek Domane gen 5, Marin Gestalt X10, Diamondback Century 3. Marin Four Corners
MapMyRide or Strava?
Okay, I ran Map My Ride for a while, mostly mtn biking and was satisfied. Now on my road bike, I've also been running Strava lately. Can't tell a bunch of difference between the two. I run them as a phone app, no GPS device, and I run them both as I ride. I hate being undecided but can't seem to firmly come down on one or the other. I probably need to run only one, running two uses more battery power. I recently rode and completed a century with both going but the battery was below 10% when finished at 6.5 hours. I'm currently only using the free apps as I can't see any real benefit to the premium subscription.
So I'm sort of leaning toward Strava now. Strava seems a little more "polished" perhaps. I also like the tracking of my own PR's and the segment sections comparisons with numerous PR's and KOM's. Not that I'm competitive against others, but I like to see how I'm doing, where I stand as an older dude against the real riders. I also like trying to best my PR's on certain segments of routes I ride. MMR doesn't track quite those same stats and particularly segments aren't really followed quite like on Strava. It is apparent Strava is much more popular in my area.
On the other hand, IF I decided to run the premium subscription, MMR is $30 vs $60 for Strava. As I said, at this point I see no reason to upgrade beyond the free service.
As it is, I see no reason to continue using both though I do have a fear of one crashing and losing my data if I use only one. In the great scheme of things, I suppose it isn't like that is a life or death situation. Generally speaking, I use things that are useful in life and don't worry about the rest. I hate being so wishy-washy about something so unimportant but for some reason I cannot decide which one to cut loose.
So those of you who use a phone app, which of these two do you run and why?
So I'm sort of leaning toward Strava now. Strava seems a little more "polished" perhaps. I also like the tracking of my own PR's and the segment sections comparisons with numerous PR's and KOM's. Not that I'm competitive against others, but I like to see how I'm doing, where I stand as an older dude against the real riders. I also like trying to best my PR's on certain segments of routes I ride. MMR doesn't track quite those same stats and particularly segments aren't really followed quite like on Strava. It is apparent Strava is much more popular in my area.
On the other hand, IF I decided to run the premium subscription, MMR is $30 vs $60 for Strava. As I said, at this point I see no reason to upgrade beyond the free service.
As it is, I see no reason to continue using both though I do have a fear of one crashing and losing my data if I use only one. In the great scheme of things, I suppose it isn't like that is a life or death situation. Generally speaking, I use things that are useful in life and don't worry about the rest. I hate being so wishy-washy about something so unimportant but for some reason I cannot decide which one to cut loose.
So those of you who use a phone app, which of these two do you run and why?
#2
Non omnino gravis
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 1,739
From: SoCal, USA!
Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,843
Likes: 17
From: Central PA
Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix
This is mostly a personal preference thing, but for me it's Strava.
Even if you don't pay for the premium, Strava don't bombard you with crap ads and their phone app feels elegantly designed (although not flawless by any means), rather than a jumble of junky UI elements and endless menus.
Even if you don't pay for the premium, Strava don't bombard you with crap ads and their phone app feels elegantly designed (although not flawless by any means), rather than a jumble of junky UI elements and endless menus.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Portage, MI
Bikes: 2016 Emonda ALR 5, 2014 Trek 7.2 FX
The MMR mapping tools are spectacular. I use them for mapping my routes, but exclusively use Strava for recording my activities. I feel like the experience is a little more polished.
#8
This is mostly a personal preference thing, but for me it's Strava.
Even if you don't pay for the premium, Strava don't bombard you with crap ads and their phone app feels elegantly designed (although not flawless by any means), rather than a jumble of junky UI elements and endless menus.
Even if you don't pay for the premium, Strava don't bombard you with crap ads and their phone app feels elegantly designed (although not flawless by any means), rather than a jumble of junky UI elements and endless menus.
Between the two I'd choose Strava and go with the free membership. It sounds like you appreciate the segments and they're popular where you ride, that should be enough.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 13
Unless you have a HRM or power meter I can't recommend strava premium. The free version of strava gives you 98% of the functions if you are just using the app.
You could sign up for a month (or hope for a free trial month) to see for yourself.
I can't comment on MMR premium.
Ride with GPS has the best route maker.
You could sign up for a month (or hope for a free trial month) to see for yourself.
I can't comment on MMR premium.
Ride with GPS has the best route maker.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 880
Likes: 11
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Bikes: Trek Emonda SL6, Trek Madone 4.5, Trek X-Caliber
I like MMR for the reporting capabilities, but Strava for tracking etc. Strava seems more polished in my opinion and I link to Veloviewer for more detailed metrics which I do absolutely nothing with. Best bet is to get a Garmin Edge, it synchs with both so you have your rides logged in both of them and it saves battery life on the phone.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 84
From: Boardman, Oregon, USA
Bikes: Orbea Orca,Raleigh Talus 29er, Centurion Le Mans 12 speed
Strava as I can input my ride from my bike computer easily to Strava, AND Strava and BKool talk to each other so that if I ride the trainer it automatically will report to Strava and when I import my ride to Strava from my bike computer it automatically will send that information to BKool.
I use a BKool Pro trainer/simulator often so that I can get in my ride even if it is windy, hot, cold, dark, icy, or other situations outside, and also with the trainer if I haven't finished the route I can still quit, save my effort for that session and shower out to keep on the schedule I have or to meet an obligation/appointment.
I use a BKool Pro trainer/simulator often so that I can get in my ride even if it is windy, hot, cold, dark, icy, or other situations outside, and also with the trainer if I haven't finished the route I can still quit, save my effort for that session and shower out to keep on the schedule I have or to meet an obligation/appointment.
#12
Custom User Title
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 11,239
Likes: 35
From: SE MN
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
I've never been a fan of Map My Ride. The website is horrible and half the time I can't even get it to load. I've heard it's better for creating maps, but honestly I find Strava routes easier to create especially with the use popularity option since it allows you to pick out often used roads in areas you don't know.
#14
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 169
From: Pinehurst, NC, US
Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade
I use Strava to track/evaluate results. But I use MMR when I want to plan a route. But I'm running with a Garmin Edge device on the road and a laptop at home (pre and post ride). But this seems to be a sensible partitions of duties for me.
dave
dave
#15
I like to know where I have ridden and how I'm doing, and like to follow others, so it's Strava for me. The flyby viewer is really neat. Then there's VeloViewer for awesome stats and graphs.
I rarely map out rides beforehand and do NOT like attempting to follow a map or a cue sheet during a ride (will use the navigation system in my car when I HAVE to be somewhere or if the route is particularly complicated, but otherwise I dislike it), so MMR hasn't piqued my interest.
I rarely map out rides beforehand and do NOT like attempting to follow a map or a cue sheet during a ride (will use the navigation system in my car when I HAVE to be somewhere or if the route is particularly complicated, but otherwise I dislike it), so MMR hasn't piqued my interest.
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
I use Strava for looking at the ride on the computer, but I also use Cyclemeter. Cyclemeter has a lousy web based experience, but really has a ton of stuff in the app- way more than Strava. Has a rundown of every Km, or daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly data shown per ride or as graph. Time spent at a certain value... all kinds of stuff.
Never used MMR or the gps one.
Never used MMR or the gps one.
#17
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 997
Likes: 61
From: Western NC mountains
Bikes: Trek Domane gen 5, Marin Gestalt X10, Diamondback Century 3. Marin Four Corners
Thanks for all the input. I think Strava is going to get the nod, rather than running both apps. I like some of the features of Strava just enough to go with that primarily. I can "log a workout" into MMR if I want a backup to store my ride data, and to get the weekly email updates, as well as the monthly progress updates as well.
I particularly like the segment tracking on Strava and the social feed to see what others are doing in my area and as a comparison to my own performance.
However, at the end of the day, I just want to ride my bike, enjoy it as a great stress reliever and enjoyable exercise option. The apps are just a nice addition to keep tabs on my progress.
I particularly like the segment tracking on Strava and the social feed to see what others are doing in my area and as a comparison to my own performance.
However, at the end of the day, I just want to ride my bike, enjoy it as a great stress reliever and enjoyable exercise option. The apps are just a nice addition to keep tabs on my progress.
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Interesting. More Strava users than MMR.
I tried Strava but end up with MMR because of one feature. MMR offer's instant speed on their display. For a beginner this is kind of nice as you experiment with different riding styles and as positive feedback over similar rides as you improve.
Just my 2 cents.
I tried Strava but end up with MMR because of one feature. MMR offer's instant speed on their display. For a beginner this is kind of nice as you experiment with different riding styles and as positive feedback over similar rides as you improve.
Just my 2 cents.
#19
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 997
Likes: 61
From: Western NC mountains
Bikes: Trek Domane gen 5, Marin Gestalt X10, Diamondback Century 3. Marin Four Corners
Yeah, they both have their positive features that the other doesn't have. And they each have some shortcomings. That's what has made the decision so difficult for me and frankly, I'm not ready to scrap either one of them.
Just that it doesn't make much sense running two apps that essentially do the same thing.
I don't use either for real time tracking such as speed. I have a cateye computer that gives me instant speed and distance readouts.
I DO like the MMR calling out distances and speed every 5 miles. Strava doesn't do that.
There is also a delay when you stop before Strava detects and announces, "Pausing ride". Sometimes as much as 30 seconds and more. That delay, over the time of a long ride, effectively increases your ride time and decreases your average MPH. MMR almost always gives me a slightly higher MPH and seems to agree with the bike computer a little more closely. Again, while somewhat irritating it isn't life and death here and thus not that important. I mean, realistically, what difference does .6 mph or .4 total mileage matter over the course of 74 miles?
So we just have to decide where my priorities are and go with the app that best meets those. For me, the segment tracking of Strava, along with the irritating pop-up ads on MMR, gives the nod to Strava.
Just that it doesn't make much sense running two apps that essentially do the same thing.
I don't use either for real time tracking such as speed. I have a cateye computer that gives me instant speed and distance readouts.
I DO like the MMR calling out distances and speed every 5 miles. Strava doesn't do that.
There is also a delay when you stop before Strava detects and announces, "Pausing ride". Sometimes as much as 30 seconds and more. That delay, over the time of a long ride, effectively increases your ride time and decreases your average MPH. MMR almost always gives me a slightly higher MPH and seems to agree with the bike computer a little more closely. Again, while somewhat irritating it isn't life and death here and thus not that important. I mean, realistically, what difference does .6 mph or .4 total mileage matter over the course of 74 miles?
So we just have to decide where my priorities are and go with the app that best meets those. For me, the segment tracking of Strava, along with the irritating pop-up ads on MMR, gives the nod to Strava.
#20
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 289
From: Vancouver, BC
I have a powermeter and HRM and I still don't see any value in premium. I've had it before on a trial basis and have it now for 3 months as a result of buying a Garmin 520 but I don't use any of the premium features. Live segments on the 520 is cute but also annoying as I don't feel like attacking segments every time I ride them.
#21
I guess I should have clarified. I don't use a phone to track my rides, I use a Garmin Edge 1000 and then I have my rides auto sync to Garmin Connect, Strava and MyFitnessPal when I hit save.
I actually have MyFitnessPal get the data from Strava as their calorie estimator is WAY better than Garmin Connect.
I used to use my phone as my ride computer, but once I switched to the Garmin there's just no going back. Way better.
I actually have MyFitnessPal get the data from Strava as their calorie estimator is WAY better than Garmin Connect.
I used to use my phone as my ride computer, but once I switched to the Garmin there's just no going back. Way better.
#23
Full Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 330
Likes: 13
From: East Central Illinois
Bikes: 2003 Raleigh M40, 2015 Raleigh RX 2.0, 2017 Kinesis Tripster A/T
I use mmr and I find it easy to creating courses(like segments). I also have their premium membership for live tracking for my family members. I also like the live coaching to work on different aspects of my workout.
#24
I am a long time Map My Run user who recently got back into cycling.
As much as I wanted to like the Map My Ride it just wasn't doing it for me, and mostly it just wasn't being used by the other guys I ride with. So now I do all my riding with Strava and all my running with MMR.
It's not really a pain to use both since i use them for different things. I use my phone (in a jersey pocket for riding and in an armband for running) and it doesn't seem to bog down my phone at all having both apps since they are never running at the same time.
As much as I wanted to like the Map My Ride it just wasn't doing it for me, and mostly it just wasn't being used by the other guys I ride with. So now I do all my riding with Strava and all my running with MMR.
It's not really a pain to use both since i use them for different things. I use my phone (in a jersey pocket for riding and in an armband for running) and it doesn't seem to bog down my phone at all having both apps since they are never running at the same time.
#25
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 14,779
Likes: 743
From: Northwest Georgia
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Agreed. Their route planner is blazing fast compared to Strava and has the best features by far.
Map Bike Rides with Elevation Profiles, Analyze Cycling Performance, Train Better. Ride With GPS
Current speed is not just for beginners and unless they fixed it recently, the latest update for Strava does not have it. They show average speed instead which is all but useless on a ride. Many premium members were furious when they lost current speed at the last app update and lack of current speed makes Strava a a non-starter for me as my primary app.
-Tim-
Map Bike Rides with Elevation Profiles, Analyze Cycling Performance, Train Better. Ride With GPS
-Tim-





