Does a smaller frame "wind up" faster than a large frame?
05-01-05, 10:03 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Does a smaller frame "wind up" faster than a large frame?
Do most racers use frames that are a little to small rather than a little too big and just put long-assed stems on them?
What are the advantages of a smaller frame, if any?
What are the advantages of a smaller frame, if any?
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
05-01-05, 10:18 PM
#2
Industry Maven
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936
Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most cyclists should aim for a 100-120mm stem on their bikes, although more flexible and fitter pros sometimes go 130. Just depends. 100-120 appears to give the best weight balance though in my experience.
In terms of frame design, the longer the seatpost and the shallower the angle between the seat and chinastays usually means more vertical compliance with means a softer ride in the saddle. This is over-simplified however, as the material and design of both seatstays and chainstays do play a role.
How's that for succinct?
In terms of frame design, the longer the seatpost and the shallower the angle between the seat and chinastays usually means more vertical compliance with means a softer ride in the saddle. This is over-simplified however, as the material and design of both seatstays and chainstays do play a role.
How's that for succinct?
