Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Power-speed question

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Power-speed question

Old 05-08-16, 09:16 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 335

Bikes: Mosaic RT-1, Trek Boone, Cervelo R3 Team, Surly Cross Check, Bike Friday Pocket Rocket

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Power-speed question

I have always thought that given wind, weight, etc., power determines speed. But I was fooling around in a group ride today and noticed that going a steady speed (behind some guy), shifting between gears altered the power (and yes I did let the power meter settle down). I believe it was the case that easier gears (and thus higher cadence) led to higher power. Again, that's maintaining the same speed.

Physics nerds, what gives?

And if I'm right (and I saw it with my own eyes), is it possible to overvalue power?
profjmb is offline  
Old 05-08-16, 09:38 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by profjmb
I have always thought that given wind, weight, etc., power determines speed. But I was fooling around in a group ride today and noticed that going a steady speed (behind some guy), shifting between gears altered the power (and yes I did let the power meter settle down). I believe it was the case that easier gears (and thus higher cadence) led to higher power. Again, that's maintaining the same speed.

Physics nerds, what gives?

And if I'm right (and I saw it with my own eyes), is it possible to overvalue power?
That's not exactly a controlled environment for a test. Firstly you don't know if the rider in front of you was putting out constant power. Secondly power reported by a meter is quite stochastic so you'd need to carefully average over a reasonable period of time to get meaningful numbers to do a comparison.

There can be small changes in drivetrain efficiency between different gears which might be measureable with a crank-based powermeter but as I said above the conditions for your test are too variable to measure the small differences that exist.

Suspect you were just seeing coincidental changes in power.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 05-08-16, 09:55 PM
  #3  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 900 Post(s)
Liked 1,122 Times in 482 Posts
Originally Posted by profjmb
I have always thought that given wind, weight, etc., power determines speed.
Continue to think that.

But I was fooling around in a group ride today and noticed that going a steady speed (behind some guy), shifting between gears altered the power (and yes I did let the power meter settle down).
Which power meter?
RChung is offline  
Old 05-08-16, 10:08 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
For your own safety and that of others, please look up rather than stare at your computer.
caloso is offline  
Old 05-09-16, 03:00 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 335

Bikes: Mosaic RT-1, Trek Boone, Cervelo R3 Team, Surly Cross Check, Bike Friday Pocket Rocket

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
I have a Stages Power meter.

I did it several times and it showed the same effect. Why don't you try it the next time you can?

It is not necessary to stare at the power meter in order to get the idea.
profjmb is offline  
Old 05-09-16, 03:31 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
The power needed is determined by the product of the total drag force (incl. aerodynamic, rolling, gravitational, and mechanical losses) and your speed. But there could be small changes in the drag force depending on the gear ratio you choose - aero drag could change with cadence as your legs move faster or your body positioning changes slightly, mechanical losses can change with a different chainline and chain tension. However, I'd expect the changes to be pretty small.

Another cause for what you saw would be inaccuracies in the power meter. It has sensors to measure your pressure on the crank and therefore the effective torque and also determines your cadence in order to estimate your power input to the bike. If those sensors aren't perfectly linear then you'd get a different reading in a lower gear with decreased torque but higher cadence even if the actual power didn't change.
prathmann is offline  
Old 05-09-16, 04:08 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,514
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1028 Post(s)
Liked 447 Times in 263 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
Another cause for what you saw would be inaccuracies in the power meter. It has sensors to measure your pressure on the crank and therefore the effective torque and also determines your cadence in order to estimate your power input to the bike. If those sensors aren't perfectly linear then you'd get a different reading in a lower gear with decreased torque but higher cadence even if the actual power didn't change.
The white horse was 1/8 inch shorter than the black one. OP is using a Stages.
asgelle is offline  
Old 05-09-16, 05:30 PM
  #8  
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 42,957

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22513 Post(s)
Liked 8,843 Times in 4,113 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
For your own safety and that of others, please look up rather than stare at your computer.
Why? Staring at computer works for that Froome guy, from what I can tell.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 05-09-16, 05:59 PM
  #9  
SuperGimp
 
TrojanHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Whittier, CA
Posts: 13,346

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 147 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 47 Posts
How much of a power change are you talking about here?
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old 05-09-16, 06:19 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by profjmb
I have a Stages Power meter.

I did it several times and it showed the same effect. Why don't you try it the next time you can?

It is not necessary to stare at the power meter in order to get the idea.
It's entirely possible your power balance changes with cadence. If you follow at a constant pace your power output will be constant but the number reported by your meter will vary depending on the balance between your left and right legs. Tough to do accurate measurements with stages unfortunately.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 05-09-16, 09:45 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
That's not exactly a controlled environment for a test. Firstly you don't know if the rider in front of you was putting out constant power. Secondly power reported by a meter is quite stochastic so you'd need to carefully average over a reasonable period of time to get meaningful numbers to do a comparison.

There can be small changes in drivetrain efficiency between different gears which might be measureable with a crank-based powermeter but as I said above the conditions for your test are too variable to measure the small differences that exist.

Suspect you were just seeing coincidental changes in power.
I agree. This is why I usually have my Garmin display a 10s avg for more reasonable smoothing.
caloso is offline  
Old 05-09-16, 10:03 PM
  #12  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 900 Post(s)
Liked 1,122 Times in 482 Posts
Originally Posted by profjmb
is it possible to overvalue power?
Originally Posted by profjmb
I have a Stages Power meter.
Ah. So you may be undervaluing power.
RChung is offline  
Old 05-09-16, 11:23 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
trainsktg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 475
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
Ah. So you may be undervaluing power.
? In the context of the right leg potentially averaging more power than the left?

Keith
trainsktg is offline  
Old 05-10-16, 05:00 AM
  #14  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 900 Post(s)
Liked 1,122 Times in 482 Posts
In the context of using the Stages to raise and answer questions about power. People often buy the Stages for its (relatively) low price, but subsequently are puzzled by some aspect of the data they collect. They're undervaluing good quality power data. Many power meter users, not just Stages owners, claim that consistency is what matters, not accuracy or precision. The OP appears to have noticed a consistent pattern of varying behavior in the power reported at a constant speed while varying gear ratios, which challenges physics.

Not everyone needs high quality data from their power meter but there's danger in using lower quality data to try to overturn physics. If you're trying to overturn physics, you need accuracy and precision, too. That's why when someone presents a power conundrum you can save a lot of time if the first question is "which power meter are you using?"
RChung is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whitemax
Road Cycling
44
06-17-17 01:23 PM
Thomas90
Adaptive Cycling: Handcycles, Amputee Adaptation, Visual Impairment, and Other Needs
1
04-29-16 12:43 PM
AZSkeptic
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
3
04-13-16 10:35 AM
Alias530
Road Cycling
19
07-02-15 02:48 PM
rangerdavid
Road Cycling
21
12-10-11 08:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.