Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

ERTO width chart and Hed Jets

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

ERTO width chart and Hed Jets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-18 | 11:32 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
ERTO width chart and Hed Jets

Over the years, I have frequently come across the ERTO tire width chart on Sheldon Brown's website with which most of you are undoubtedly familiar

Tire Sizing Systems

And then, just today I was looking at the specs of the Hed Jet 6 Plus

https://www.hedcycling.com/jet-6-plus/

...which lists the internal rim width as being 21 mm. So according to that chart, that would mean that the narrowest tire I should use on a Jet 6+ would be 35 mm. But, the Hed-recommended tire size is 23 mm

That has got to be wrong (the chart, I mean, not Hed's recommendation).

Now I realize this chart is merely for recommended widths. The note right under it says that it errs on the side of caution. but these two width numbers are so far apart that I feel certain I must be missing something obvious.

Could someone with a clearer understanding (or better eyes) tell me what I am missing?
JoeO is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-18 | 11:48 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 1,304
From: Seattle
HED recommends a 23mm tire for the Jet because tires of that size will combine with the external profile of the rim to form a nice aerodynamic shape.

The ETRTO chart is very conservative, and also fairly old. My guess would be that the minimum-width recommendations are based on assumptions which simply don't apply in current wide-rim road use cases, such as that the 21mm internal-width rim might not be designed to handle road inflation pressures, and that a user will pump their 23mm tire to 130PSI.
HTupolev is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-18 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 52

Bikes: Super Cheap gc3 approved Bike

That chart is useless for the newer rims. These rims are wider because as HTupolev stated, it's for aerodynamic purpose, to reduce the transition from rim to tire. The bulbous shape of the tire is where most of the turbulance/aerodynamic issues occur on the wheel. That's why the rims are getting wider, 27mm rims with 28mm tires. Of course the wider tires have the added benefit of reduced pressure = comfort and wider surface area = reduced rolling resistance. For 28mm tires for example, I would definitely look at minimum 25mm wide rims.

Of course these are not set rules, if you want to ride 32mm tires on 21mm rims, and it works, go for it.
zymphad is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-18 | 12:30 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
OK, great that makes a lot of sense. Thanks
JoeO is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-18 | 12:40 PM
  #5  
tyrion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 2,015
From: San Diego, California

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Originally Posted by JoeO
Over the years, I have frequently come across the ERTO tire width chart on Sheldon Brown's website with which most of you are undoubtedly familiar

Tire Sizing Systems

And then, just today I was looking at the specs of the Hed Jet 6 Plus

https://www.hedcycling.com/jet-6-plus/

...which lists the internal rim width as being 21 mm. So according to that chart, that would mean that the narrowest tire I should use on a Jet 6+ would be 35 mm. But, the Hed-recommended tire size is 23 mm

That has got to be wrong (the chart, I mean, not Hed's recommendation).

Now I realize this chart is merely for recommended widths. The note right under it says that it errs on the side of caution. but these two width numbers are so far apart that I feel certain I must be missing something obvious.

Could someone with a clearer understanding (or better eyes) tell me what I am missing?
The aero rims are a whole new ballgame that the Sheldon Brown chart predates. The HED recommendation for 23mm is to achieve the aerodynamics the rim was designed for.
tyrion is offline  
Reply
Old 02-14-18 | 10:00 PM
  #6  
MakiNn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 192
Likes: 17
From: Minnesota

Bikes: Spooky Mulholland

Also to put a spin to the mix, HED Jet 6+ wheels with a 25mm tire are actually super aero and fast with low low rolling resistance. I think you can find their wind tunnel experiments
MakiNn is offline  
Reply
Old 02-15-18 | 01:37 PM
  #7  
Iride01's Avatar
Facts just confuse people
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 19,317
Likes: 7,049
From: Mississippi

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

The chart on the Sheldon Brown site has been there forever. Tires and rims today are different than back then. The chart was also just a guideline for when you lacked specific recommendations. The HED site gives you a specific recommendation.

Sheldon's chart is still useful, but remember it has to be very conservative because it doesn't account for variables of rim type, variable of tire bead type, etc.
Iride01 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pistard
Bicycle Mechanics
6
01-31-16 06:52 PM
robert schlatte
Bicycle Mechanics
3
04-13-15 02:59 PM
wanderoo222
Road Cycling
20
10-27-14 03:55 PM
mstraus
Commuting
21
03-25-14 07:52 PM
billydonn
Fifty Plus (50+)
12
06-08-10 07:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.