Carbon tubulars Mavic 2019 CCU vs Zipp 454 NSW vs Enve 3.4
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Norcal
Posts: 207
Bikes: Moots Vamoots RSL 2018, Passoni Titanio 2020
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
8 Posts
Carbon tubulars Mavic 2019 CCU vs Zipp 454 NSW vs Enve 3.4
Looking to buy a pair of carbon tubulars (let's not have the tubular vs clincher debate here). I like the look of the new Mavic Carbon Ultimate 2019 (will be in USA in September from what I heard from my LBS) and I also like the looks of the Zipp 454 NSW tubular. I added Enve 3.4 because of their technology (no drilling of the carbon rim) and their warranty, good service etc but I find the looks of Enve as being too plain
I am looking at wheels around 40 mm (max 53mm like the Zipp 454) that can be used as a set of everyday wheels; durable and stiff - the stiffer the better
Anybody has any experience with these wheels? Any advice? I am planning to use tape https://www.effettomariposa.eu/en/products/carogna/ for installation if that's of any importance.
I am looking at wheels around 40 mm (max 53mm like the Zipp 454) that can be used as a set of everyday wheels; durable and stiff - the stiffer the better
Anybody has any experience with these wheels? Any advice? I am planning to use tape https://www.effettomariposa.eu/en/products/carogna/ for installation if that's of any importance.
Last edited by Boerd; 08-09-18 at 06:55 AM.
#2
Senior Member
I am waiting for my Campy Bora 35 carbon wheels. The Mavic Aksiums that came with my Synapse are much heavier than the Ambrosio Nemesis aluminum tubular wheels I have been riding. I definitely notice the extra rotational weight.
ProBikeKit had the Boras on sale for $ 1200.00
i would have had my local wheelbuilder but the advent of disc brakes has ushered in a new design concern since there is less symmetry to the braking forces which may make traditional wheelbuilding need to adapt.
ProBikeKit had the Boras on sale for $ 1200.00
i would have had my local wheelbuilder but the advent of disc brakes has ushered in a new design concern since there is less symmetry to the braking forces which may make traditional wheelbuilding need to adapt.
#3
Senior Member
Any wheel building techniques that needed adapting to disc brakes surely must have been worked on during the past decade and a half (at least) that MTBs have been using disc brakes, or so I'd think. I've built a few disc wheels myself now along with numerous rim brake wheels. Used the same ages-old techniques which yielded the same good results in either type of build. YMMV.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I bought clinchers, but faced a similar choice, and went with Enve 4.5 ARs. Zipps were available, too, but they've had a lot of problems with wheels they've sold (hubs, rims cracking at spoke holes) and their service isn't reputed to be very great. I've been absolutely in love with my Enve wheels. So my advice would be the 3.4s based on all of that.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
If you want stiff wheels, go for a 24/28 spoke count on whichever rim/brand you choose.
Even the stiffest rim won't make a stiff wheel with 18/24 or 20/24 lacing. Spokes and spoke gauge is what makes a stiff wheel.
Even the stiffest rim won't make a stiff wheel with 18/24 or 20/24 lacing. Spokes and spoke gauge is what makes a stiff wheel.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Norcal
Posts: 207
Bikes: Moots Vamoots RSL 2018, Passoni Titanio 2020
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
8 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fujiraf
Road Cycling
0
07-25-18 12:17 PM