Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Proper bike computer or iPhone?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Proper bike computer or iPhone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-18 | 02:34 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 758
Likes: 64
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp

Proper bike computer or iPhone?

I see many riders with a Garmin Edge or another dedicated bike computer, and then an iPhone in their jersey pocket. Are there certain reasons that we can't use the iPhone as the bike computer?
Robert A is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 02:41 PM
  #2  
Trsnrtr's Avatar
Super Modest
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 25,343
Likes: 6,637
From: Central Illinois

Bikes: Trek Domane+x2, Trek Emonda

Nope. The only limitation may be size, battery life, and exposure to the elements. Go for it.
__________________
“Train hard until your legs are tanned, then keep going until the shape arrives.” -Jolanda Neff



Trsnrtr is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 02:44 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
The most common reasons are battery life of your phone and lack of ant+. There are some phones with ant+ now but not iphoiP as far as I know. I used to have a Garmin but now I'm using my Android phone with a mount and I have no complaint . Bike computer apps use GPS so they can drain battery so if you are the type that is going on 4-6+ hour rides that may be a concern . My rides are usually under 2 hrs and my phone gets great battery life so I don't see that as an issue for myself anymore. There are plenty of Bluetooth accessories so that ant+ isn't an issue. I use Bluetooth cadence, speed and heart rate with no problem. Some people claim ant+ is more reliable and less prone to interference but I think the latest Bluetooth protocol gets rid of most of those issues .
rms13 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 02:58 PM
  #4  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,115
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Bigger, heavier, more fragile, more expensive, worse battery life, and doesn't talk to my PM.
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 03:15 PM
  #5  
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 487
Likes: 54
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Trek Domane 4.3

Originally Posted by Robert A
I see many riders with a Garmin Edge or another dedicated bike computer, and then an iPhone in their jersey pocket. Are there certain reasons that we can't use the iPhone as the bike computer?
What do you want it to do? If you want constant display of data - speed, cadence, HR, distance - then you will quickly grow tired of having to touch the screen every few minutes to have it show you that information. You will then also quickly drain the battery during your ride by ensuring a constant display. You will also tire of having this large device mounted to your handlebars, and become angered should you wreck and have it crushed or fly off.

But, if you just want to stick it in your pocket to track your ride for review later, then no need for a computer.
drewguy is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 04:00 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by drewguy
What do you want it to do? If you want constant display of data - speed, cadence, HR, distance - then you will quickly grow tired of having to touch the screen every few minutes to have it show you that information. You will then also quickly drain the battery during your ride by ensuring a constant display. You will also tire of having this large device mounted to your handlebars, and become angered should you wreck and have it crushed or fly off.

But, if you just want to stick it in your pocket to track your ride for review later, then no need for a computer.
I haven't used an iphone for bike computer replacement but I've tested 4 apps on my Android phone and they all display info while I'm riding just the same as my Garmin did. Screen doesn't go to sleep, there is no need to touch the screen during ride to show me any information. I'd assume the apps like Strava, Map My Ride, Wahoo tracker, bike computer all work the same way on iphone The size of the phone is a consideration if you have one of the bigger iphones. I have an android phone with a 5.5" screen and it fits perfectly on my stem but that depends again on size of the phone, size of your stem etc. I have a $20 mount that is shock proof rubber and there is no way the phone is going to fly off. I've been over all kinds of bumps and quick stops and fast descents and it stays put. There are more expensive mounts like Quadlock that are even more substantial. With the correct mounting solution the chance of your phone flying off your bike is about the same as your bike computer flying off your bike and I've never experienced either. If you wreck your bike you will have more problems then just your phone but if you wreck you could break your bike computer and you could break your phone if it's in your jersey pocket as well. If you are worried about that you should probably pay for insurance on your phone. I touched upon battery life and that is a concern depending on your phone and how long your usually ride. I won't argue with anyone that wants a dedicated bike computer but the fact is that any smart phone can provide all of the functionality of a bike computer and more and some of us don't feel the need to spend $250+ on redundant tech when we are carrying our phone anyway
rms13 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 04:12 PM
  #7  
Brofessor's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 136
Likes: 1
From: IL

Bikes: Schwinn Circuit 89'

I use my iPhone with the Panobike app. Third party bluetooth sensors work with the Panobike, I have speed/cadence and HRM. You will need one of the phone holders to use your phone as computer though. I use this one: https://www.morpheus-labs.com/
Brofessor is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 04:23 PM
  #8  
DrIsotope's Avatar
Non omnino gravis
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 1,739
From: SoCal, USA!

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

If you're doing 1-2 hour rides in your local area, the phone will do the job just fine. Start adding sensors to the bike, and going on longer rides, and a dedicated computer is a better solution. I did ~5 hours today, and my phone went through about 30% of it's battery doing nothing but playing Pandora. Ride apps like Strava devour battery.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 05:15 PM
  #9  
DOS's Avatar
DOS
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 76
From: Arlington, VA USA
Size, battery life, better turn by turn functionality is why I got my wahoo.

oh, and wahoo is waterproof.
DOS is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 05:29 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
If you're doing 1-2 hour rides in your local area, the phone will do the job just fine. Start adding sensors to the bike, and going on longer rides, and a dedicated computer is a better solution. I did ~5 hours today, and my phone went through about 30% of it's battery doing nothing but playing Pandora. Ride apps like Strava devour battery.
To be fair, everything devours iPhone batteries. Thanks Apple for planned obsolescence.
rms13 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 05:34 PM
  #11  
DrIsotope's Avatar
Non omnino gravis
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 1,739
From: SoCal, USA!

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

I never said iPhone. Buuuuuttt... I get on average, 3 years out of each iPhone. People "upgrading" annually are doing so out of want, not out of need.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 05:57 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
I never said iPhone. Buuuuuttt... I get on average, 3 years out of each iPhone. People "upgrading" annually are doing so out of want, not out of need.
My wife's iPhone 6 battery only lasted about 3 hours on a full charge after 1.5 years. "Lucky" for us Apple replaced the battery for $30 since they know that their iOS upgrades caused battery issues

coincidentally, new stories about this today:

https://www.cnet.com/news/apples-bat...with-ios-12-1/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspe...ttle-problems/
rms13 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 07:17 PM
  #13  
Flip Flop Rider's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 561
From: South Carolina Upstate

Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850

Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
Nope. The only limitation may be size, battery life, and exposure to the elements. Go for it.
​​​​​​​lol that's 3 limitations
Flip Flop Rider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 09:03 PM
  #14  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
iPhone data is also very inaccurate and all over..the data on bike computer is more accurate as sensors are built for specific purpose.

i also hate operating touchscreen while cycling..buttons are better as u dont have to look at them to operate them.
wayne310 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-18 | 09:21 PM
  #15  
DrIsotope's Avatar
Non omnino gravis
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 1,739
From: SoCal, USA!

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

It's because the GPS in phones doesn't do a great job of plotting points at speed. Standing still, it can place you pretty well-- at 20mph, the margin of error is like 10 meters. The Strava app can also be a bit... wonky.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 12:13 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
I have Wahoo Bluetooth speed, cadence and hr monitor and they work great with my phone and it's just as accurate as my Garmin 520 was
rms13 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 01:28 AM
  #17  
bogydave's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 914
Likes: 25
From: ALASKA , SoCal

Bikes: /Skye/ Torker mt, Sirrus flat bar

Some use vice grips or channel locks on a 1/2” nut
(does many mechanic things ....ok..)

Some use a 1/2” wrench. Designed for a 1/2”
nut.

Both work.

I go with the wrench
bogydave is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 06:34 AM
  #18  
Brofessor's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 136
Likes: 1
From: IL

Bikes: Schwinn Circuit 89'

Originally Posted by wayne310
iPhone data is also very inaccurate and all over..the data on bike computer is more accurate as sensors are built for specific purpose.

i also hate operating touchscreen while cycling..buttons are better as u dont have to look at them to operate them.
Do you have any data to back up your claim? Or is this your “opinion”?

I don’t see how a phone would show different info than a head unit if the sensor used is the same. They don’t “interpret” data, they just read it to you.
Brofessor is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 06:45 AM
  #19  
Trsnrtr's Avatar
Super Modest
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 25,343
Likes: 6,637
From: Central Illinois

Bikes: Trek Domane+x2, Trek Emonda

Originally Posted by Flip Flop Rider
lol that's 3 limitations
​​​​​​​I like to give bonus answers.
__________________
“Train hard until your legs are tanned, then keep going until the shape arrives.” -Jolanda Neff



Trsnrtr is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 06:50 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 375
One issue with the phone (that won't apply to the OP given where he lives) is that in the cold, the batter can drain really quickly. I've had my phone go from 50% down to 5% on a 1/2 hour commute in winter (about -12 degrees that day). Once the phone warmed up, it went back up to something like 35%, but had I been going for a longer ride, I would have missed recording a bunch of it. I don't doubt a cycle computer would potentially experience a similar issue, but it's easier to keep that fully charged as you're not using it for other stuff all the time. Plus, the longer battery life in general will counter this somewhat.
OBoile is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 06:52 AM
  #21  
rumrunn6's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,474
Likes: 4,557
From: 25 miles northwest of Boston

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

following
rumrunn6 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 07:01 AM
  #22  
DrIsotope's Avatar
Non omnino gravis
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 1,739
From: SoCal, USA!

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

I have never, EVER ridden with someone who was using the phone app and had them end up with less distance or elevation. Last time out, the person using the phone app had the most distance, and I knew for an absolute fact I had ridden about 1 mile further, as I had ridden ahead and looped back several times, and made several parking lot loops waiting for others to catch up. Now I can't 100% say it's the phone or the GPS-- as the apps like Strava and RWGPS basically use their own math.

Phone GPS latency also helps guys gobble up short-segment KOMs-- the ones on Strava where their average speed is higher than their max speed.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 06:25 PM
  #23  
wipekitty's Avatar
vespertine member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,473
Likes: 223
From: Land of Angora, Turkey

Bikes: Yes

Battery life, potential damage to the phone, and not wanting something that large on my handlebars are my reasons for not using my phone as a bike computer.

I have a basic GPS bike computer that cost ~$50. It's significantly more accurate than the Strava app I used to run on my Android (results are fairly consistent with the Garmins that my riding companions use), and can pair with heart rate and cadence sensors. It just doesn't have the mapping features that one gets with the higher-end Wahoo or Garmin devices.
wipekitty is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 06:35 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by wipekitty
Battery life, potential damage to the phone, and not wanting something that large on my handlebars are my reasons for not using my phone as a bike computer.

I have a basic GPS bike computer that cost ~$50. It's significantly more accurate than the Strava app I used to run on my Android (results are fairly consistent with the Garmins that my riding companions use), and can pair with heart rate and cadence sensors. It just doesn't have the mapping features that one gets with the higher-end Wahoo or Garmin devices.
My Android phone is not much bigger then a Garmin 1030, weighs about 30g more, pairs with my Wahoo speed, cadence and HR monitors and has GPS/Maps/turn by turn and I already own it.
rms13 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-18 | 07:38 PM
  #25  
nycphotography's Avatar
NYC
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 115
Originally Posted by Robert A
I see many riders with a Garmin Edge or another dedicated bike computer, and then an iPhone in their jersey pocket. Are there certain reasons that we can't use the iPhone as the bike computer?
no reason you can't. lots of reasons why you (me? some people?) prefer not.
nycphotography is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.