Proper bike computer or iPhone?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 758
Likes: 64
From: Los Angeles
Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp
Proper bike computer or iPhone?
I see many riders with a Garmin Edge or another dedicated bike computer, and then an iPhone in their jersey pocket. Are there certain reasons that we can't use the iPhone as the bike computer?
#2
Super Modest



Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 25,343
Likes: 6,637
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Domane+x2, Trek Emonda
Nope. The only limitation may be size, battery life, and exposure to the elements. Go for it.
__________________
“Train hard until your legs are tanned, then keep going until the shape arrives.” -Jolanda Neff
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
The most common reasons are battery life of your phone and lack of ant+. There are some phones with ant+ now but not iphoiP as far as I know. I used to have a Garmin but now I'm using my Android phone with a mount and I have no complaint . Bike computer apps use GPS so they can drain battery so if you are the type that is going on 4-6+ hour rides that may be a concern . My rides are usually under 2 hrs and my phone gets great battery life so I don't see that as an issue for myself anymore. There are plenty of Bluetooth accessories so that ant+ isn't an issue. I use Bluetooth cadence, speed and heart rate with no problem. Some people claim ant+ is more reliable and less prone to interference but I think the latest Bluetooth protocol gets rid of most of those issues .
#4
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,115
From: Sacramento, California, USA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Bigger, heavier, more fragile, more expensive, worse battery life, and doesn't talk to my PM.
#5
Full Member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 487
Likes: 54
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Trek Domane 4.3
But, if you just want to stick it in your pocket to track your ride for review later, then no need for a computer.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
What do you want it to do? If you want constant display of data - speed, cadence, HR, distance - then you will quickly grow tired of having to touch the screen every few minutes to have it show you that information. You will then also quickly drain the battery during your ride by ensuring a constant display. You will also tire of having this large device mounted to your handlebars, and become angered should you wreck and have it crushed or fly off.
But, if you just want to stick it in your pocket to track your ride for review later, then no need for a computer.
But, if you just want to stick it in your pocket to track your ride for review later, then no need for a computer.
#7
I use my iPhone with the Panobike app. Third party bluetooth sensors work with the Panobike, I have speed/cadence and HRM. You will need one of the phone holders to use your phone as computer though. I use this one: https://www.morpheus-labs.com/
#8
Non omnino gravis
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 1,739
From: SoCal, USA!
Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu
If you're doing 1-2 hour rides in your local area, the phone will do the job just fine. Start adding sensors to the bike, and going on longer rides, and a dedicated computer is a better solution. I did ~5 hours today, and my phone went through about 30% of it's battery doing nothing but playing Pandora. Ride apps like Strava devour battery.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
If you're doing 1-2 hour rides in your local area, the phone will do the job just fine. Start adding sensors to the bike, and going on longer rides, and a dedicated computer is a better solution. I did ~5 hours today, and my phone went through about 30% of it's battery doing nothing but playing Pandora. Ride apps like Strava devour battery.
#11
Non omnino gravis
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 1,739
From: SoCal, USA!
Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
coincidentally, new stories about this today:
https://www.cnet.com/news/apples-bat...with-ios-12-1/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspe...ttle-problems/
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 561
From: South Carolina Upstate
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850
#14
Member
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
iPhone data is also very inaccurate and all over..the data on bike computer is more accurate as sensors are built for specific purpose.
i also hate operating touchscreen while cycling..buttons are better as u dont have to look at them to operate them.
i also hate operating touchscreen while cycling..buttons are better as u dont have to look at them to operate them.
#15
Non omnino gravis
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 1,739
From: SoCal, USA!
Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 914
Likes: 25
From: ALASKA , SoCal
Bikes: /Skye/ Torker mt, Sirrus flat bar
Some use vice grips or channel locks on a 1/2” nut
(does many mechanic things ....ok..)
Some use a 1/2” wrench. Designed for a 1/2”
nut.
Both work.
I go with the wrench
(does many mechanic things ....ok..)
Some use a 1/2” wrench. Designed for a 1/2”
nut.
Both work.
I go with the wrench
#18
I don’t see how a phone would show different info than a head unit if the sensor used is the same. They don’t “interpret” data, they just read it to you.
#19
Super Modest



Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 25,343
Likes: 6,637
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Domane+x2, Trek Emonda
#20
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 375
One issue with the phone (that won't apply to the OP given where he lives) is that in the cold, the batter can drain really quickly. I've had my phone go from 50% down to 5% on a 1/2 hour commute in winter (about -12 degrees that day). Once the phone warmed up, it went back up to something like 35%, but had I been going for a longer ride, I would have missed recording a bunch of it. I don't doubt a cycle computer would potentially experience a similar issue, but it's easier to keep that fully charged as you're not using it for other stuff all the time. Plus, the longer battery life in general will counter this somewhat.
#22
Non omnino gravis
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 1,739
From: SoCal, USA!
Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu
I have never, EVER ridden with someone who was using the phone app and had them end up with less distance or elevation. Last time out, the person using the phone app had the most distance, and I knew for an absolute fact I had ridden about 1 mile further, as I had ridden ahead and looped back several times, and made several parking lot loops waiting for others to catch up. Now I can't 100% say it's the phone or the GPS-- as the apps like Strava and RWGPS basically use their own math.
Phone GPS latency also helps guys gobble up short-segment KOMs-- the ones on Strava where their average speed is higher than their max speed.
Phone GPS latency also helps guys gobble up short-segment KOMs-- the ones on Strava where their average speed is higher than their max speed.
#23
Battery life, potential damage to the phone, and not wanting something that large on my handlebars are my reasons for not using my phone as a bike computer.
I have a basic GPS bike computer that cost ~$50. It's significantly more accurate than the Strava app I used to run on my Android (results are fairly consistent with the Garmins that my riding companions use), and can pair with heart rate and cadence sensors. It just doesn't have the mapping features that one gets with the higher-end Wahoo or Garmin devices.
I have a basic GPS bike computer that cost ~$50. It's significantly more accurate than the Strava app I used to run on my Android (results are fairly consistent with the Garmins that my riding companions use), and can pair with heart rate and cadence sensors. It just doesn't have the mapping features that one gets with the higher-end Wahoo or Garmin devices.
#24
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Battery life, potential damage to the phone, and not wanting something that large on my handlebars are my reasons for not using my phone as a bike computer.
I have a basic GPS bike computer that cost ~$50. It's significantly more accurate than the Strava app I used to run on my Android (results are fairly consistent with the Garmins that my riding companions use), and can pair with heart rate and cadence sensors. It just doesn't have the mapping features that one gets with the higher-end Wahoo or Garmin devices.
I have a basic GPS bike computer that cost ~$50. It's significantly more accurate than the Strava app I used to run on my Android (results are fairly consistent with the Garmins that my riding companions use), and can pair with heart rate and cadence sensors. It just doesn't have the mapping features that one gets with the higher-end Wahoo or Garmin devices.
#25






