Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

How do you find % grade of a road?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

How do you find % grade of a road?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-06, 03:55 PM
  #51  
Calamari to go
Thread Starter
 
cc_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,113

Bikes: Trek 750

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just a follow up.
My orginal question was how to get the data to calculate grade. The math part is easy.

August last year I bought a "Sky Mounti" inclinometer.
https://www.velimpex.com/about_inclin...t_inclinometer
Totally unnecessary purchase but a fun gadget to have. Cheap, simple and easy to install. Doesn't give me the average grade of a hill, but it gives the actual grade at any given point. Would be a good supplement to a GPS with altimeter. Couple minor disadvantages: it only reads to a 20% grade, and if I am wobbling and bouncing too much the bubble jumps around (that has helped me to ride steadier.)
Generally easy to use. Accurate enough for my purposes.

On the first time out, I used it check Hog Back Mountain near Leesburg, VA. Turned out it wasn't as steep (or as high) as I thought, between 12% and 15% for 1/4 mile and 10% to 12% for another 1/4. Later I confirmed it with topo maps. Gave me a better appreciation of the cyclists who tackle the "real" mountains.

Last edited by cc_rider; 03-24-06 at 05:27 PM.
cc_rider is offline  
Old 03-24-06, 04:03 PM
  #52  
Used to be a climber..
 
GuitarWizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 6,849

Bikes: 2016 Ridley Fenix SL, 2020 Trek Emonda ALR (rim brake)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
My Ciclosport CM434 seems to work fairly well in the atltimeter/% grade department.
GuitarWizard is offline  
Old 03-24-06, 04:34 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
This is a bit of a hobby of mine.

There are a number of ways of getting data:

1) Altimeter-based cycling computer (like a Polar 720, which I have). You can get a rough idea, but the resolution of the computer isn't very great, so the results won't be great.

2) GPS-based cycling computer. Better than the altimeter, *but* elevation is the least accurate of the GPS measurements, and it's easy to get in cases where you don't have a good view of the sky. If you can give your GPS a few minutes at the top and bottom, you will get better data. Collected in realtime, GPS data tends to be fairly noisy, and some gps units will interpolate if they lose signal.

3) Topo maps. I have TopoUSA from DeLorme, which is okay, though it has a terrible user interface and is slow. I have come up with similar data on it vs a gps-based cyclocomputer for a century - within at least a couple of percent. This will give you pretty good data on the overall climb *but* the road overlay may not be correctly aligned on the topo data *or* the road may be graded differently, so it's not great for trying to figure the maximum climb.

You could go to my website at https://www.bicycleclimbs.com, enter a climb, and then see what the statistics are. I pull elevation data from the USGS, which I think is the same source that delorme uses, with the same sort of problems. It's good at overall climbs and average gradient, not really worth much on maximum gradient. If you want to do this you'll need to create a login and then request the ability to enter climbs.

I have a couple of designs for building a direct-measuring instrument that would record the gradient the whole way up a hill, but I haven't gotten around to building them yet.
__________________
Eric

2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

Read my cycling blog at https://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto https://www.bicycleclimbs.com
ericgu is offline  
Old 03-24-06, 08:37 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 194

Bikes: Trek 5200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I believe % grade is sin(x), as someone earlier said. A 45 degree angle will be a 70.7% grade and a 90 degree cliff would be 100% grade. This is NOT rise over run, that would be tan(x), tan(45degree)=100%. Grade, sin(x) is rise over linear distance travelled, or rise divided by the hyponeteus of the triangle. This makes sense as sin(x)*m*g is the vector component of the gravitational force with respect to the direction travelled.
Silver Litz is offline  
Old 03-24-06, 09:24 PM
  #55  
synapses firing
 
bluecd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: leesburg, va.
Posts: 682
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i go here https://www.gmap-pedometer.com/ to map out a particular climb im curious about. then i input the rise & distance here https://www.csgnetwork.com/inclinedeclinegradecalc.html and let it do the math for me.
bluecd is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 08:21 AM
  #56  
Calamari to go
Thread Starter
 
cc_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,113

Bikes: Trek 750

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Silver Litz
I believe % grade is sin(x), as someone earlier said. A 45 degree angle will be a 70.7% grade and a 90 degree cliff would be 100% grade. This is NOT rise over run, that would be tan(x), tan(45degree)=100%. Grade, sin(x) is rise over linear distance travelled, or rise divided by the hyponeteus of the triangle. This makes sense as sin(x)*m*g is the vector component of the gravitational force with respect to the direction travelled.
Incorrect.
The industry definition of grade as used by traffic engineers, civil engineers, architects, etc. is RISE/RUN * 100 = % GRADE.
You can play with the angle if you want, but it won't be in accordance with the industry accepted standard. We have other definitions and standards that involve the angles.
PS I do this for a living. If I get it wrong, I can cost my clients big $$$ and could get sued.


Originally Posted by bluecd
i go here https://www.gmap-pedometer.com/ to map out a particular climb im curious about. then i input the rise & distance here https://www.csgnetwork.com/inclinedeclinegradecalc.html and let it do the math for me.
Nice calculator. And good explanation. Thanks.
So ... how about that Woodburn Road

Last edited by cc_rider; 03-25-06 at 08:30 AM.
cc_rider is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 08:34 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,564
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
use Nasa worldwind, and zoom into your ride loop with
the 1 meter topo map overlay. then you have your rise and run
right at your fingertips. calculate and you're done.
edzo is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 08:42 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 194

Bikes: Trek 5200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks cc_Rider. It is good to have a professional road engineer to give a definitive answer. The reason for my assumption of sin(x), not tan(x) was from the following from Swain, D.P. Cycling: Uphill and Downhill. In: Encyclopedia of Sports Medicine and Science; https://www.sportsci.org/encyc/cyclin...ngupdown.html:


"As indicated in the following equation, there are three primary forces to be overcome in bicycling: rolling resistance, air resistance and gravity:


W = krMs + kaAsv2 + giMs

where W is power, kr is the rolling resistance coefficient, M is the combined mass of cyclist and bicycle, s is the bicycle speed on the road, ka is the air resistance coefficient, A is the combined frontal area of cyclist and bicycle, v is the bicycle speed through the air (i.e. road speed plus head wind speed), g is the gravitational acceleration constant, and i is the road incline (grade; however, this is only an approximation, as the sine of the road angle to the horizontal should technically be used)."


The way i was used in the equation would imply that it is sin(x). Rereading this citation, the author hints that "grade" is just an approximation for "incline" (and is a reasonable approximation for low angles).
Silver Litz is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 08:57 AM
  #59  
synapses firing
 
bluecd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: leesburg, va.
Posts: 682
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cc_rider
Nice calculator. And good explanation. Thanks.
So ... how about that Woodburn Road

woodburn is a good one. sunday rides include taylorstown rd then stumptown rd back to back (brutal) with woodburn towards the end. if you havent tried taylorstown & stumptown and you like to climb, you should try to check them out.
bluecd is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 09:01 AM
  #60  
Calamari to go
Thread Starter
 
cc_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,113

Bikes: Trek 750

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Silver Litz
Thanks cc_Rider. It is good to have a professional road engineer to give a definitive answer.
No prob.
Architect, not traffic engineer, but I've laid out major sites, like shopping centers, office parks, apartment complexs and RV campgrounds.
Spent yesterday morning with a client trying to figure our how to get ramps on the site of an existing warehouse so they could drive trucks in at the 4 ft high loading docks.


Originally Posted by Silver Litz
...The reason for my assumption of sin(x), not tan(x) was from the following from Swain, D.P. Cycling: Uphill and Downhill. In: Encyclopedia of Sports Medicine and Science.....
"....grade; however, this is only an approximation, as the sine of the road angle to the horizontal should technically be used)."
Yep. There's a lot of misinformation out there.
Looks right for physics of power consmuption, but he misses the technical definition of grade, conflates it with incline.
Bad scientist, no tenure.
cc_rider is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 09:18 AM
  #61  
Calamari to go
Thread Starter
 
cc_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,113

Bikes: Trek 750

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bluecd
woodburn is a good one. sunday rides include taylorstown rd then stumptown rd back to back (brutal) with woodburn towards the end. if you havent tried taylorstown & stumptown and you like to climb, you should try to check them out.
Haven't done Taylorstown and Stumptown yet, but I've heard about them. Usuall take Milltown back to Waterford.
Woodburn is just so easy to get to, since I'm on Dry Mill anyway. And I like the ride back on Harmony Church. Learned that route a few Reston Centurys ago.
cc_rider is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 09:24 AM
  #62  
Calamari to go
Thread Starter
 
cc_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,113

Bikes: Trek 750

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Sky Mounti works well for most riding, but the 20% limit is a minor annoyance.

For hills over 20% I've got a device that measures angles accurate to 1/2 degree. Just a pro quality plumber's protractor, but I've added a chart with all of the common slopes and their angles. I use it at work to measure ramps, roofs, sidewalks, parking lots, etc.
Carry it with me when riding sometimes, but to use it I have to stop and get off the bike.

Here's my reference chart. Set it up graphically on CAD and just listed the angles. The number after the % grade is the angle of the slope.

1% 0.6
2% 1.2
3% 1.7
4% 2.3
5% 2.9
6% 3.4
7% 4.0
8% 4.6
9% 5.1
10% 5.7
11% 6.3
12% 6.8
13% 7.4
14% 8.0
15% 8.5
16% 9.1
17% 9.7
18% 10.2
19% 10.8
20% 11.3
21% 11.9
22% 12.4
23% 13.0
24% 13.5
25% 14.0
26% 14.6
27% 15.1
28% 15.7
29% 16.2
30% 16.8
32% 17.8
34% 18.8
36% 19.8
38% 20.8
40% 21.8
42% 22.8
44% 23.7
46% 24.7
48% 25.6
50% 26.6

Last edited by cc_rider; 03-25-06 at 09:31 AM.
cc_rider is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 09:49 AM
  #63  
synapses firing
 
bluecd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: leesburg, va.
Posts: 682
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cc_rider
Haven't done Taylorstown and Stumptown yet, but I've heard about them. Usuall take Milltown back to Waterford.
Woodburn is just so easy to get to, since I'm on Dry Mill anyway. And I like the ride back on Harmony Church. Learned that route a few Reston Centurys ago.
harmony church is one of my favorites also. especially the recently paved section. there are a couple long decents where you can really fly. it's getting a bit crowded with car traffic but it's worth it.
bluecd is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 10:09 AM
  #64  
Calamari to go
Thread Starter
 
cc_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,113

Bikes: Trek 750

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bluecd
harmony church is one of my favorites also. especially the recently paved section. there are a couple long decents where you can really fly. it's getting a bit crowded with car traffic but it's worth it.
I like Milltown from Lovettsville to Waterford. The views are great, and there's not too much traffic.
Other favorites out there are Mountain Road to Irish Corner, and Lincoln Road to North Fork.

Is Taylorstown and/or Stumptown bigger than the Saint Louis Road at Goose creek? That's a BIG hill at the Notre Dame Academy.

Last edited by cc_rider; 03-25-06 at 03:22 PM.
cc_rider is offline  
Old 03-25-06, 06:45 PM
  #65  
部門ニ/自転車オタク
 
NomadVW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 3,173

Bikes: 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, 2012 Blue Norcross CX, 2016 Blue Axino SL, 2016 Scott Scale, Fixie, Fetish Cycles Road Bike (on the trainer)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Anyone own that inclinometer that was listed before from Velimpex? Looking to find the mount diameter. Don't know if it will fit the oversized bars on the roubaix.

VW
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
NomadVW is offline  
Old 03-26-06, 10:33 AM
  #66  
Calamari to go
Thread Starter
 
cc_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,113

Bikes: Trek 750

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NomadVW
Anyone own that inclinometer that was listed before from Velimpex? Looking to find the mount diameter. Don't know if it will fit the oversized bars on the roubaix.

VW
Do you mean the Sky Mounti?
If so, then yes. I got mine last August. Velimpex is a distributor, but other people carry it too.
About $25. Doesn't take up much space. The mount is a 2-piece with 2 screws. Looks like it can fit over a pretty big bar, I have it on the fattest part of mine and still had to use the shim-pad.
cc_rider is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.