Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

We are all crazy.

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

We are all crazy.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-19 | 07:57 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 429
Likes: 51
What really makes me shake my head and smile every time is seeing fat guys on light carbon bikes, talking about how light their bikes are. They don't seem concerned about dropping those 30-40 pounds at all
kansukee is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 08:25 AM
  #27  
noodle soup's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,946
Likes: 1,901
Originally Posted by MyTi
Even if you race unless you are a paid to race, sponsored professional, it makes zero sense to spend thousands on a bike.


So how much is your Ti bike worth?
noodle soup is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 08:29 AM
  #28  
PepeM's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Likes: 120
Originally Posted by MyTi
Even if you race unless you are a paid to race, sponsored professional, it makes zero sense to spend thousands on a bike.
Why would a sponsored professional be paying for his own bike?
PepeM is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 09:17 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 256
Likes: 8
Used to spend ~$10k per year for moto racing before this. Not even on upgrades. Just getting there, paying track/race fees for practice sessions, races, buying tires.
And that's on years that I haven't crashed and had to replace moto parts.


So yeah I'll take this

Having said that, not all upgrades have to have actual functional purpose. I'd argue that IF getting that gear you want for whatever stupid reason makes you ride it more, it was worth it. I'm also type of guy who laser focuses on one hobby. I'm sure others are similar. Bike gear killed my desire for all other gear or "things" I don't want a better car. I don't want better phone. I don't want better cameras... All that stuff..
gurk700 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 09:37 AM
  #30  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,116
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Originally Posted by MyTi
Even if you race unless you are a paid to race, sponsored professional, it makes zero sense to spend thousands on a bike.
It would make even less than zero sense for a professional, since their teams provide the bikes. In fact, in the lower ranks one of the few perks is that riders can sometimes sell off their old equipment at the end of the season to augment their meager salaries. Phil Gaimon covers this in one of his books.
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 09:49 AM
  #31  
noodle soup's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,946
Likes: 1,901
Originally Posted by caloso
It would make even less than zero sense for a professional, since their teams provide the bikes. In fact, in the lower ranks one of the few perks is that riders can sometimes sell off their old equipment at the end of the season to augment their meager salaries. Phil Gaimon covers this in one of his books.
In the 80s + 90s I would get a new bike every year(at EP from the manufacturer), and sell it the following Spring. I'd basically break even, and always ride the latest gear.

Back then, employee prices were less than dealer cost.
noodle soup is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 09:56 AM
  #32  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 122
Likes: 8
From: TN
I like a comfortable somewhat fast bike but beyond that I don't get too crazy as I'm never going to race and I do this for fitness and mental health so 12k bike won't really help with that.. to each their own though.
Adonis72 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 09:58 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,841
Likes: 2,859
Originally Posted by kansukee
What really makes me shake my head and smile every time is seeing fat guys on light carbon bikes, talking about how light their bikes are. They don't seem concerned about dropping those 30-40 pounds at all
That would be me...........minus the light carbon bikes. No reason to ride something above my ability.
seypat is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 12:24 PM
  #34  
6-4 Titanium
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 330
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by noodle soup


So how much is your Ti bike worth?
Seems to sell around $2-3k on ebay. I’m about $1100 in after upgrades but it is a 16 pound bike, lighter than $2k-4K carbon road bikes at my LBS in the same size and yes we weighed them on a professional scale and the lbs owner was surprised that my litespeed vortex was so light. Of course some of those road bikes had disc brakes.
MyTi is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 12:45 PM
  #35  
noodle soup's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,946
Likes: 1,901
Originally Posted by MyTi
Seems to sell around $2-3k on ebay. I’m about $1100 in after upgrades but it is a 16 pound bike, lighter than $2k-4K carbon road bikes at my LBS in the same size and yes we weighed them on a professional scale and the lbs owner was surprised that my litespeed vortex was so light. Of course some of those road bikes had disc brakes.
So it made zero sense for you to buy that bike.
noodle soup is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 12:55 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 261
Originally Posted by MyTi
Even if you race unless you are a paid to race, sponsored professional, it makes zero sense to spend thousands on a bike.
So you don't own anything more than the basic minimum requirement to achieve its purpose?
Anyone that has anything over and above this is crazy?
Whether it be nice cars, bikes, house, shoes, clothes, phone etc, etc.
Dean V is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 12:59 PM
  #37  
Abe_Froman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 57
From: Chicago

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Originally Posted by seypat
That would be me...........minus the light carbon bikes. No reason to ride something above my ability.
That's a bit of a fallacy though. A fat person gets precisely the same benefit from equipment as a skinny guy. Or a slow guy gets just as much benefit from equipment as a fast guy.

The real question is whether the gains are what the individual considers relevant, or wanted.
Abe_Froman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 02:43 PM
  #38  
seau grateau's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,948
Likes: 400
From: PHL

Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block

Originally Posted by Abe_Froman
That's a bit of a fallacy though. A fat person gets precisely the same benefit from equipment as a skinny guy. Or a slow guy gets just as much benefit from equipment as a fast guy.

The real question is whether the gains are what the individual considers relevant, or wanted.
Not really. Lighter weight riders are disproportionately affected by weight of equipment because their bikes are a greater proportion of the total weight they have to carry uphill and aerodynamic gains are more significant at higher speeds.
seau grateau is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 03:11 PM
  #39  
Abe_Froman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 57
From: Chicago

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Originally Posted by seau grateau
Not really. Lighter weight riders are disproportionately affected by weight of equipment because their bikes are a greater proportion of the total weight they have to carry uphill and aerodynamic gains are more significant at higher speeds.
But a pound on the bike will slow each rider down the exact same mph.
Abe_Froman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 03:14 PM
  #40  
seau grateau's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,948
Likes: 400
From: PHL

Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block

No, but OK.
seau grateau is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 03:38 PM
  #41  
Abe_Froman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 57
From: Chicago

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Originally Posted by seau grateau
No, but OK.
Yes, actually.

In fact, on a percentage of speed, a heavier rider will experience a larger % increase in speed than a lighter rider would.

edit: hrmm. Now I'm not so sure lol. I worked out a couple scenarios using bikecalculator.com. 150lb rider gained 6% going up a grade losing 10lbs. 200lb rider gained 5% speed going up the same grade losing the same weight. I'm a bit confused by this if I'm being honest

Last edited by Abe_Froman; 06-18-19 at 03:44 PM.
Abe_Froman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 03:41 PM
  #42  
seau grateau's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,948
Likes: 400
From: PHL

Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block

Ok.
seau grateau is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 03:47 PM
  #43  
Abe_Froman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 57
From: Chicago

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

You're talkative.
Abe_Froman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 03:56 PM
  #44  
seau grateau's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,948
Likes: 400
From: PHL

Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block

I see you played yourself up there, so I'm good.
seau grateau is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 04:23 PM
  #45  
Abe_Froman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 57
From: Chicago

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Ok
Abe_Froman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 05:56 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 1,429
From: Music City, USA

Bikes: bikes

Originally Posted by seau grateau
Not really. Lighter weight riders are disproportionately affected by weight of equipment because their bikes are a greater proportion of the total weight they have to carry uphill and aerodynamic gains are more significant at higher speeds.
Not really. Slower people get more of an advantage (total time saved) from aero equipment than faster people.
rubiksoval is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 06:19 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 261
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
Not really. Slower people get more of an advantage (total time saved) from aero equipment than faster people.
He would be referring to percentage gains, not absolute time differences.
Dean V is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 06:50 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 1,429
From: Music City, USA

Bikes: bikes

Originally Posted by Dean V
He would be referring to percentage gains, not absolute time differences.
Doesn't matter. Slower people save more time with aero equipment than fast people. Simple fact.

The adage that you need to be able to go a certain speed or be at a certain weight to benefit is wrong.
rubiksoval is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 06:54 PM
  #49  
GlennR's Avatar
On Your Left
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,373
Likes: 2,440
From: Long Island, New York, USA

Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303

A 10 watt saving for someone putting out 100 watts is a 10% saving. For someone putting out 250 watts it's a 4% saving.

Simple math.
GlennR is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-19 | 07:05 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 1,429
From: Music City, USA

Bikes: bikes

Originally Posted by GlennR
A 10 watt saving for someone putting out 100 watts is a 10% saving. For someone putting out 250 watts it's a 4% saving.

Simple math.
A 5% improvement for a 60 min 40k time trial is 3 mins, for a 50 min 40k time trial is 2.5 mins.

3 mins is more than 2.5 mins.

Simple math.
rubiksoval is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.