SRAM invents rotating 3 FD system
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
SRAM invents rotating 3 FD system
It sounds like this would give the bike a slightly cleaner look, and still not work. Next year, there will be a rotating 1x system.
All of the design’s front shifting mechanisms are built into the crankset. There’s nothing – zero – mounted to the frame. The system includes a wireless receiver, battery, and one motor, all of which enable three separate derailleurs. It’s all tied together with linkages and cams and pivots and springs and sensors in a symphony of electro-mechanical action. I’ll skip over most of the internal fiddly bits, and focus on how shifting actually works.
...
SRAM engineers found a way around this, but it adds significant complexity to the system. Sensors know the rotational position of the cranks, so the downshifting elements only move into shift position when they’re between about 6:30 and 11 o’clock. When one downshift element approaches 11 o’clock, it encounters the side of the chain, and pushes the chain inward and down to the small ring. That’s why there are two downshifting elements: press a shift button, and the system waits until one of them is in the right spot. That means two shift periods per pedal stroke.
https://cyclingtips.com/2020/06/radi...g-derailleurs/
All of the design’s front shifting mechanisms are built into the crankset. There’s nothing – zero – mounted to the frame. The system includes a wireless receiver, battery, and one motor, all of which enable three separate derailleurs. It’s all tied together with linkages and cams and pivots and springs and sensors in a symphony of electro-mechanical action. I’ll skip over most of the internal fiddly bits, and focus on how shifting actually works.
...
SRAM engineers found a way around this, but it adds significant complexity to the system. Sensors know the rotational position of the cranks, so the downshifting elements only move into shift position when they’re between about 6:30 and 11 o’clock. When one downshift element approaches 11 o’clock, it encounters the side of the chain, and pushes the chain inward and down to the small ring. That’s why there are two downshifting elements: press a shift button, and the system waits until one of them is in the right spot. That means two shift periods per pedal stroke.
https://cyclingtips.com/2020/06/radi...g-derailleurs/
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 1,777
Bikes: 2022 Fuel EX 8, 2021 Domane SL6, Black Beta (Nashbar frame), 2004 Trek 1000C for the trainer
Liked 521 Times
in
287 Posts
Interesting the wireless technology allows it. But Looks like it may add expense to the chain rings or a more complex replacement procedure.
#3
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,301
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Liked 1,818 Times
in
1,034 Posts
OMG.
What's wrong with a Schlumpf drive? They work great. They have more range than what a standard 2x can offer. They are all sealed up & have none of this confounding complexity.
I bet this high maintenance proprietary monstrosity will cost well into 4 digits after market maturity...& still won't be supported in 10 years.
Replacement rings, anyone?
SRAM: Do you even bicycle, Bro?
What's wrong with a Schlumpf drive? They work great. They have more range than what a standard 2x can offer. They are all sealed up & have none of this confounding complexity.
I bet this high maintenance proprietary monstrosity will cost well into 4 digits after market maturity...& still won't be supported in 10 years.
Replacement rings, anyone?
SRAM: Do you even bicycle, Bro?
Last edited by base2; 06-17-20 at 01:15 PM.
Likes For base2:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
For a company that thinks 1x is the future, this sure seems like a lot of investment into 2x.
I’ll bet $1.00 that even if SRAM came out with this, which is questionable, people would still prefer di2.
I’ll bet $1.00 that even if SRAM came out with this, which is questionable, people would still prefer di2.
Likes For smashndash:
#6
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Liked 2,434 Times
in
1,187 Posts
I have one word... 1X. Problem solved
#7
This is silly. There's NO WAY you can get it to work without dragging unless it is part of an electronic shifting group and there is a lot of built-in programming to force it into the correct position on top to bottom cog shifts. That would take THREE motors on the front. SRAM does not have good engineering and most of their components are cheap junk that you pay premium prices for.
#8
I did too until I happened to get a Ultegra Di2 group with hydraulic disks on the cheap. After I got it working I was sold on it.
My DuraAce manual group is noisy and very hard to set up properly and I've been working on my bikes for 40 years.
My DuraAce manual group is noisy and very hard to set up properly and I've been working on my bikes for 40 years.
Likes For RiceAWay:
Likes For RiceAWay:
#10
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,631
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Liked 1,318 Times
in
565 Posts
I've said it many times and I stand by it - we will see the return of triples.
Also this is just a patent. I wouldn't hold your breath.
Also this is just a patent. I wouldn't hold your breath.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Likes For Psimet2001:
#11
Senior Member
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,364
Bikes: yes, i have one
Liked 1,210 Times
in
708 Posts
a computer can still shift the FD if done right but this just seems like a cockamamie idea with a lot of moving parts. so many things to go wrong.
#13
Is today April 1st?
Likes For noodle soup:
#16
Full Member
Chances are SRAM never intends to produce this, but is only doing so to file the patents. One of the reasons SRAM went wireless when they developed E-tap was because so many patents already filed was a big hinderance.
#17
Senior Member
No batteries, no bluetooth, no cables, no brifter, and it's French:
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I bet that works better than a yaw DR.
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#19
Full Member
Technology companies often file all sorts of patents for things that may or may not materialize. Sometimes oddball ideas lead to breakthroughs. It’s healthy and normal for parents like this to get filed. Not sure why you guys are getting out the pitchforks and torches.
Likes For justonwo:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,164
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,177 Times
in
2,690 Posts
My rather cynical observation is that SRAM has been burned rather badly by at least one very famous FD mishap. The very public chain jam that cost Tour de France racer Andy Schleck the race, SRAM FDs are widely talked os as inferior to their competitors. I'm inclined to agree after picking up a collection of SRAM, Campy, Shimano and SunTour FDs to see if I can get a low Q-factor triple working well.
If you cannot make an FD work, well, try something else.
Ben
If you cannot make an FD work, well, try something else.
Ben
Likes For 79pmooney:
#21
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,478
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Liked 2,129 Times
in
1,387 Posts
This reminds me of that C&V expanding chain ring.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#23
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,301
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Liked 1,818 Times
in
1,034 Posts
You can now add rear derailleur to the list of garbage SRAM turns out as well...A friend & I took out our mountain bikes the other day. Hers had never been crashed, knocked over etc. & had only been on 1 other ride. A hollow pin of rolled steel in the derailleur bent (& then sheared) from what we can only figure was vibration of riding or just simply the force of the long lever of the derailleur cage necessary to extend up to the 50 tooth cog. To cap it off, while sorting out the derailleur situation, we learned the shifter has enough room internally for the head of the shift cable to turn around & jam up the guts of the shifter. It's just sloppy design. It was a long, slow 7 mile ride/coast down off the mountain.
$125 for a better derailleur with a solid pin, plus labor on a twice riden bike.
I'd send my money elsewhere. Over-priced, poorly engineered & cheaply executed.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
If this becomes a thing in reality, they can call it triple tap.
#25
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Liked 3,685 Times
in
2,028 Posts
So, the strategy is to convince us all that we don't need FDs, wait for us to buy frames with no provisions for FDs, let us realize we still want FDs, then sell an incredibly overengineered system to give us an FD back?
Likes For Bah Humbug: