Aero Helmet Thoughts
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 849 Post(s)
Liked 343 Times
in
246 Posts
I went from a crappy (but light) Rudy Project to Specialized Evade because it looks cool. And I want to look cool.
It's honestly not all that great. The Evade is designed for oblong heads and my head is super round/wide so I had to size up. I basically have an asteroid on my head. The Cd might be lower but the A is way higher than my Rudy. Also, the Evade seems to be optimized for when you're looking almost directly at the horizon. If I dip my head lower than that, the air feels a bit more turbulent. Almost like an air brake. I miss being able to tuck my head in low and feel the wind on the back of my neck. I'd almost say that position with a normal helmet was faster than head up with an aero helmet. But ofc head-low positions are much harder to sustain. It's impossible in a tight peloton/race. It's only good for friendly or solo rides.
I think there's good reason Remco uses the Prevail over the Evade. He frequently uses the head down position, and the evade would act as an air brake in those situations. For $270, I got to look cool but idk if I got any faster. Subjectively, I have less fun with the evade because I feel forced to maintain an optimalTM head position. It's not worth it for casual riders IMO.
Oldschool TT helmets were optimized for head up positions, but newer ones are optimized for a range of positions, especially head down ones. Check out the Danish pursuit team for a good example. The newer helmets have tails that bend down. The evade does not have that because most racing happens in the head-up position.
This is all to say - don't count on the aero helmet being faster for you. And even if it is, is it really worth it?
It's honestly not all that great. The Evade is designed for oblong heads and my head is super round/wide so I had to size up. I basically have an asteroid on my head. The Cd might be lower but the A is way higher than my Rudy. Also, the Evade seems to be optimized for when you're looking almost directly at the horizon. If I dip my head lower than that, the air feels a bit more turbulent. Almost like an air brake. I miss being able to tuck my head in low and feel the wind on the back of my neck. I'd almost say that position with a normal helmet was faster than head up with an aero helmet. But ofc head-low positions are much harder to sustain. It's impossible in a tight peloton/race. It's only good for friendly or solo rides.
I think there's good reason Remco uses the Prevail over the Evade. He frequently uses the head down position, and the evade would act as an air brake in those situations. For $270, I got to look cool but idk if I got any faster. Subjectively, I have less fun with the evade because I feel forced to maintain an optimalTM head position. It's not worth it for casual riders IMO.
Oldschool TT helmets were optimized for head up positions, but newer ones are optimized for a range of positions, especially head down ones. Check out the Danish pursuit team for a good example. The newer helmets have tails that bend down. The evade does not have that because most racing happens in the head-up position.
This is all to say - don't count on the aero helmet being faster for you. And even if it is, is it really worth it?
Last edited by smashndash; 12-13-20 at 04:57 PM.
#27
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,334
Bikes: Venge, Shiv, Factor LS
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 626 Times
in
294 Posts
When I crashed in October, I damaged my Giro Synthe MIPS, but escaped any head injuries. That gave me continued positive vibes about Giro helmets. Combined with the fact that Giro offered a 30% discount on any helmet as a crash replacement, I went with a Giro Vanquish MIPS. Its ventilation is probably not the best, and this test says it's not as aero as others in its class, but I like the visor. I haven't seen direct comparisons about the net power savings of helmets with visors, but I' sure it's beaucoup watts (jk).
Road, aero road and TT cycling helmets: How much difference does the type really make? - 220 Triathlon
Likes For guadzilla:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 695
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 422 Post(s)
Liked 231 Times
in
131 Posts
Back when I rode in the cold (the Kickr and Zwift have made me a cold weather wimp), I LOVED my Giro Attack - the half-face shield, the closable vents. I think it might have given me a few watts advantage... maybe. But the biggest benefit - and the reason I bought it - was the added cold weather comfort.
#29
Hear myself getting fat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Inland Northwest
Posts: 753
Bikes: Black Road Bike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
131 Posts
Here's a test from 2018
https://www.bikeradar.com/features/b...ted-and-rated/
I had the acid flash fade Evade helmet for two years. My LBS had it on sale because it was a Large, Ugly Color, and the clasp was a magnetic one instead of the standard snap one so nobody bought them and I got a great deal. It was the most comfortable helmet I've had. Wearing it back to back with another less "aero" helmet on a hill close to my house I could really tell the difference in wind noise going down the hill. It was striking in that manner. No clue if it made me "faster". I'm an old fat white Fred so I looked completely stupid wearing that helmet. Luckily nobody pays attention to what mediocrities like me are wearing so I didn't get made fun of or anything to my face. But I looked dumber than normal particularly since it was a size large. Sold it to a new owner who probably is faster for wearing it.
If anyone asks, I'd recommend the Evade over all others.
Here's a more recent "study" for some more "data".
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features...cling-helmets/
I went with a MIPS helmet with ANGI (piece of mind for my wife) and a size medium so now I only look 89 percent ridiculous instead of 113 percent ridiculous with an Aero helmet.
Here's some articles and videos (some with actual testing) showing which things for road cycling make you faster and it breaks it down my costs per watt. I think, IIRC that a helmet was up there but certainly not as good as wearing skin tight clothing and getting into a better more aero position on the bike. Wheels were high up there, but frames were not. Shave your legs, that will make you faster too.
https://www.torhans.com/pages/dollars-per-watt
https://www.shopforwatts.co.uk/blogs...watts-it-worth
https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=...J-soSCDKCKR97t
https://www.bikeradar.com/features/b...ted-and-rated/
I had the acid flash fade Evade helmet for two years. My LBS had it on sale because it was a Large, Ugly Color, and the clasp was a magnetic one instead of the standard snap one so nobody bought them and I got a great deal. It was the most comfortable helmet I've had. Wearing it back to back with another less "aero" helmet on a hill close to my house I could really tell the difference in wind noise going down the hill. It was striking in that manner. No clue if it made me "faster". I'm an old fat white Fred so I looked completely stupid wearing that helmet. Luckily nobody pays attention to what mediocrities like me are wearing so I didn't get made fun of or anything to my face. But I looked dumber than normal particularly since it was a size large. Sold it to a new owner who probably is faster for wearing it.
If anyone asks, I'd recommend the Evade over all others.
Here's a more recent "study" for some more "data".
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features...cling-helmets/
I went with a MIPS helmet with ANGI (piece of mind for my wife) and a size medium so now I only look 89 percent ridiculous instead of 113 percent ridiculous with an Aero helmet.
Here's some articles and videos (some with actual testing) showing which things for road cycling make you faster and it breaks it down my costs per watt. I think, IIRC that a helmet was up there but certainly not as good as wearing skin tight clothing and getting into a better more aero position on the bike. Wheels were high up there, but frames were not. Shave your legs, that will make you faster too.
https://www.torhans.com/pages/dollars-per-watt
https://www.shopforwatts.co.uk/blogs...watts-it-worth
Last edited by aplcr0331; 12-14-20 at 01:56 PM.
#30
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,334
Bikes: Venge, Shiv, Factor LS
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 626 Times
in
294 Posts
So interestingly, there was a study a long time ago which claimed that they found wind noise tends to reduce performance - apparently and paraphrasing, it makes your brain think you are working harder than you are, and you have a natural tendency to ease down. They claimed that shutting out the wind noise enabled a rider to put out a little more power.
Likes For guadzilla:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2620 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
So interestingly, there was a study a long time ago which claimed that they found wind noise tends to reduce performance - apparently and paraphrasing, it makes your brain think you are working harder than you are, and you have a natural tendency to ease down. They claimed that shutting out the wind noise enabled a rider to put out a little more power.
Anyway, that was 2004ish, so been around a while.
#32
Hear myself getting fat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Inland Northwest
Posts: 753
Bikes: Black Road Bike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
131 Posts
So interestingly, there was a study a long time ago which claimed that they found wind noise tends to reduce performance - apparently and paraphrasing, it makes your brain think you are working harder than you are, and you have a natural tendency to ease down. They claimed that shutting out the wind noise enabled a rider to put out a little more power.
When I got the helmet I did a "test" where I rode my "usual loop" ride twice; once with each helmet. And the only thing I noticed was that the aero one was indeed quieter (particularly on the fast downhill portions). At the time I rode the hoods all the time. I'm a bit more flexible and spend most of my time riding in the drops so I'm a bit lower than back then. I'm guessing that makes as big of a difference in aero as the helmet probably did.
#33
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,334
Bikes: Venge, Shiv, Factor LS
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 626 Times
in
294 Posts

#34
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,375
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1566 Post(s)
Liked 1,537 Times
in
956 Posts
Position for road or TT matters a lot for the helmet.
Both seem to have helmet designs better suited for "head/eyes way up" or a more "head down" or a more "turtle" style riding position.
The other thing with this is sniffing out the differences you really need a good "protocol" and decent equipment. A wheel speed sensor, GOOD power meter, and a bit of Excel magic and formulas. You can't just ride the same ole loop back to back and say "I went faster" or it "sounds quieter".
I always assumed one helmet I owned was a good one for me in TT. Then found out despite it being one typically testing well on folks......was a bit of a dog.
Both seem to have helmet designs better suited for "head/eyes way up" or a more "head down" or a more "turtle" style riding position.
The other thing with this is sniffing out the differences you really need a good "protocol" and decent equipment. A wheel speed sensor, GOOD power meter, and a bit of Excel magic and formulas. You can't just ride the same ole loop back to back and say "I went faster" or it "sounds quieter".
I always assumed one helmet I owned was a good one for me in TT. Then found out despite it being one typically testing well on folks......was a bit of a dog.
#36
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,375
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1566 Post(s)
Liked 1,537 Times
in
956 Posts
If you've trained all you can train and time trial is your game......go with the faster helmet. I can't imagine a helmet would have so much noise as to be annoying but also be the faster helmet.
As for the testing at 40, 45, and 50kph........for TT at least........not everyone lives where it is pan flat. Sure, in a pan flat area folks doing TT might never sniff 30mph worth of actual airspeed (not ground speed). But with hills, even the slowest TT riders can go over 30mph for enough time that the aero would matter.
I do my own testing to make sure stuff works with my fit and my airspeeds. I don't trust manufacturer claims or tunnel tests on folks with different positions.
Likes For burnthesheep:
#37
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yup. I just ordered an evade and it arrives today. I have an oblong head and have been fighting a giro for eight years that hot spots my forehead ! Looking forward to trying it out !
Likes For snoggin:
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,330
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20611 Post(s)
Liked 9,283 Times
in
4,597 Posts
Off the subject: I'm impressed with the time elapsed between registering with the site and your first comment - kudos!
#39
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
On the subject: I, too, have a Specialized head - I haven't found anything else that fits quite right - and have been thinking about an Evade for my next helmet.
Off the subject: I'm impressed with the time elapsed between registering with the site and your first comment - kudos!
Off the subject: I'm impressed with the time elapsed between registering with the site and your first comment - kudos!
#40
Junior Member
I use an Evade on road/gravel particularly in the winter. I use a Prevail II if its hot and on XC bike. The Evade definitely feels more aero, particularly with the head down. The Prevail is lighter and vents better. Both fit my relatively oval-ish head well.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2620 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I have a propero and evade, myself. Specialized has the best strap system I've found. I like how I don't have to adjust around the ears, and it just fits perfectly without any bunching in the back. Quite important in an aero helmet when floppy helmet straps can so negatively impact aero savings...
#42
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,068
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1335 Post(s)
Liked 501 Times
in
266 Posts
We found a 2mph increase in speed over the 15 mile course. It is a regular course that is ridden by all of us on a weekly basis as a time trial, thus we were all familiar with it. Held on same day for the helmet test and same day for wheel test between three of us, each wearing a different helmet, but using the exact same wheel set and tires. Wind conditions are almost always the same from week to week. It was as controlled a test as we could get. No kidding, the helmet did not help with reducing time over the course. The wheels without question did.
which shows how bad your test was. Based on publicly available information, it is virtually impossible that the wheels made a 2mph difference, even going from something like a 36 spoke box rim to something very aero.
It’s also highly likely that aero helmet would
make some measurable difference in speed.
there are so many variables you failed to control: wind speed and direction, temperature, effort of the rider, the placebo effect of believing you were supposed to be faster, etc, etc,.
you could have at least controlled for a constant power output.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.