Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Does rotating weight really matter?

Notices
Road Cycling ďIt is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.Ē -- Ernest Hemingway

Does rotating weight really matter?

Old 05-01-21, 11:29 PM
  #26  
Racing Dan
Senior Member
 
Racing Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,153
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1267 Post(s)
Liked 290 Times in 197 Posts
Originally Posted by sfrider View Post
It matters for acceleration since you not only have to accelerate the wheel mass forward with the rest of the bicycle, but you also have to add rotational energy to the wheels. And the rotational (angular) energy grows with the square of the rotational speed (angular velocity). (For the technical people, there is an w^2 factor where w=omega.) Forward kinetic energy only grows linearly with speed.
No, forward kinetic energy also increases at the square of the speed.
Racing Dan is offline  
Old 05-01-21, 11:42 PM
  #27  
Racing Dan
Senior Member
 
Racing Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,153
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1267 Post(s)
Liked 290 Times in 197 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote View Post
In other words, a guy who makes heavy aero wheels is trying to convince us that rotating mass doesn't matter very much.

Sure, yeah, I trust him.
True :-)

In racing and all else equal, lighter IS better. At the same power you accelerate and ascend faster. Period. However the penalty for adding a few hundred grams or even a kg is small and nothing that will spoil your Sunday ride. And saving a few aero watts is arguably more beneficial than saving a pound of weight, for most riding at least.
Racing Dan is offline  
Old 05-02-21, 12:20 AM
  #28  
Racing Dan
Senior Member
 
Racing Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,153
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1267 Post(s)
Liked 290 Times in 197 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlas Shrugged View Post
People use the rotating mass argument as a justification tool when trying to explain why they are riding multiple thousand dollar wheel sets while they are 20 or 30 lbs overweight.
Or marketing encourages misconceptions that make ppl believe a 200g lighter wheelset is much faster than the stock wheels, even if it likely isn't.

The basic difference between added weight or added rolling and wind resistance is analogue to the difference between a capacitor and a resistor. The former (weight) stores energy, but releases it again, whereas the latter (rolling and wind resistance) convert energy into heat and looses it.
Racing Dan is offline  
Likes For Racing Dan:
Old 05-02-21, 02:52 AM
  #29  
bruce19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,247

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1635 Post(s)
Liked 1,123 Times in 657 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest View Post
Having more than one road bike?
Without question.
bruce19 is offline  
Old 05-02-21, 02:56 AM
  #30  
bruce19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,247

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1635 Post(s)
Liked 1,123 Times in 657 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote View Post
In other words, a guy who makes heavy aero wheels is trying to convince us that rotating mass doesn't matter very much.

Sure, yeah, I trust him.
I don't "trust" anyone. But, I am interested in the science.
bruce19 is offline  
Old 05-02-21, 01:02 PM
  #31  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,415
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 951 Post(s)
Liked 392 Times in 235 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19 View Post
I don't "trust" anyone. But, I am interested in the science.
If you're interested in science, learn to ask a proper question. Of course rotating weight makes a difference, but then again everything makes some difference. The question is either how much of a difference does it make, or is the difference greater than some specified threshold.
asgelle is offline  
Old 05-02-21, 01:10 PM
  #32  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,191

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4443 Post(s)
Liked 1,348 Times in 875 Posts
Let's talk about cassettes.. I don't think they qualify as rotating weight, since they only rotate when pedaling, correct? There'd be no stored kinetic energy, or is there? Same for cranks?
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 05-02-21, 01:19 PM
  #33  
tyrion
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 3,869

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2094 Post(s)
Liked 1,728 Times in 839 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene View Post
Let's talk about cassettes.. I don't think they qualify as rotating weight, since they only rotate when pedaling, correct? There'd be no stored kinetic energy, or is there? Same for cranks?
There is some stored kinetic energy there, but (unlike the energy stored in wheels) it gets "thrown away" when you stop pedalling.
tyrion is offline  
Old 05-02-21, 01:42 PM
  #34  
nomadmax 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,180
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1003 Post(s)
Liked 1,504 Times in 725 Posts
Rotating weight matters to me, regardless of what an "engineer" or "scientist" says.
__________________
nomadmax is offline  
Old 05-02-21, 01:51 PM
  #35  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,415
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 951 Post(s)
Liked 392 Times in 235 Posts
Originally Posted by nomadmax View Post
Rotating weight matters to me, regardless of what an "engineer" or "scientist" says.
Well, as Daniel Patrick Moynihan said, “you’re entitled to your own opinion… .”

Last edited by asgelle; 05-02-21 at 06:52 PM.
asgelle is offline  
Old 05-02-21, 04:56 PM
  #36  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,480

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1493 Post(s)
Liked 700 Times in 495 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlas Shrugged View Post
People use the rotating mass argument as a justification tool when trying to explain why they are riding multiple thousand dollar wheel sets while they are 20 or 30 lbs overweight.
My justification is what a weapon my treadly feels like with a kilo wheelset.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 05-02-21, 06:47 PM
  #37  
dmanthree
Senior Member
 
dmanthree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,645

Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 630 Post(s)
Liked 275 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19 View Post
My take away thus far is that there has been a lot of money spent for not much gain. I am willing to be convinced otherwise but so far that's where I am.
I tried a lighter carbon wheel set a couple of years ago, and found no gain. They felt different but in the end, no noticeable speed gain. For me, at least, a total waste. I'll stick with my Roval SLX 24 wheels.
dmanthree is offline  
Old 05-03-21, 12:34 AM
  #38  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18880 Post(s)
Liked 10,640 Times in 6,050 Posts
Originally Posted by Racing Dan View Post
True :-)

In racing and all else equal, lighter IS better. At the same power you accelerate and ascend faster. Period. However the penalty for adding a few hundred grams or even a kg is small and nothing that will spoil your Sunday ride. And saving a few aero watts is arguably more beneficial than saving a pound of weight, for most riding at least.
​​​​​​No need to argue. 🙂 There's math to understand exactly how much time you'll save with less weight and with less aerodynamic resistance, so you can know which is more beneficial and by how much. We all have so much ride data we can break down how hilly our riding is, what % of our miles are on different steepness ranges, etc, to help with the "for most riding" part. You can even do that for just got favorites. We live in a golden age of cycling.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-03-21, 12:42 AM
  #39  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18880 Post(s)
Liked 10,640 Times in 6,050 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19 View Post
My take away thus far is that there has been a lot of money spent for not much gain. I am willing to be convinced otherwise but so far that's where I am.
Why do roadies have this myopic idea that anything that doesn't make you faster isn't worth doing? Having sex with my girlfriend doesn't affect my average speed on the bike, I wouldn't call it "no gain." Light weight bikes are more fun to ride, people gain more enjoyment of the time they spend cycling, anyone who thinks that's a whole lot of nothing needs to spend some time contemplating the meaning of life. When it's coming to an end none of us will care what kind of average speeds we did, most of us will care how much joy and misery we experienced when we look back.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
Old 05-03-21, 02:48 AM
  #40  
bruce19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,247

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1635 Post(s)
Liked 1,123 Times in 657 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest View Post
Why do roadies have this myopic idea that anything that doesn't make you faster isn't worth doing? Having sex with my girlfriend doesn't affect my average speed on the bike, I wouldn't call it "no gain." Light weight bikes are more fun to ride, people gain more enjoyment of the time they spend cycling, anyone who thinks that's a whole lot of nothing needs to spend some time contemplating the meaning of life. When it's coming to an end none of us will care what kind of average speeds we did, most of us will care how much joy and misery we experienced when we look back.
I'm not crazed about average speed. I do, however like it when what is advertised is what is delivered. And, at age 75 I know full well it''s the journey and not the destination.
bruce19 is offline  
Old 05-03-21, 05:05 AM
  #41  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,330

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20611 Post(s)
Liked 9,283 Times in 4,597 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19 View Post
I'm not crazed about average speed. I do, however like it when what is advertised is what is delivered. And, at age 75 I know full well it''s the journey and not the destination.
What benefits are being advertised as a direct result of wheel weight?
WhyFi is offline  
Old 05-03-21, 05:25 AM
  #42  
hubcyclist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,152

Bikes: 2017 Raleigh RX 1.0, 2018 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 575 Times in 304 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest View Post
Why do roadies have this myopic idea that anything that doesn't make you faster isn't worth doing? Having sex with my girlfriend doesn't affect my average speed on the bike, I wouldn't call it "no gain." Light weight bikes are more fun to ride, people gain more enjoyment of the time they spend cycling, anyone who thinks that's a whole lot of nothing needs to spend some time contemplating the meaning of life. When it's coming to an end none of us will care what kind of average speeds we did, most of us will care how much joy and misery we experienced when we look back.
but I think generally folks are looking for a tangible benefit when they decide to shell out cash on wheels and higher priced bikes. So itís fair to temper peopleís expectations. Iíve seen videos where the time savings of nice carbon wheels vs basic aluminum wheels is about 1min per hour, I certainly canít justify spending that much.

I have the most basic of bikes, a base model allez with Claris and axis sport branded wheels and I get lots of enjoyment on the bike, the only limiter is me. And I go way faster than a lot of folks because Iíve put in the work on myself. I think a lot of people buy into hype and then come up with nebulous things to justify spending way too much in absence of any tangible benefits they may have been looking for. Yeah itís all about fun, but I think most folks have priorities outside of cycling and helping people make smart purchases is just as important as getting enjoyment.
hubcyclist is online now  
Old 05-03-21, 06:18 AM
  #43  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,480

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1493 Post(s)
Liked 700 Times in 495 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo View Post
My justification is what a weapon my treadly feels like with a kilo wheelset.
Whoops, I meant to say, 50mm kilo wheelset...

Aero >≥ weight
Kimmo is offline  
Old 05-03-21, 06:33 AM
  #44  
sced
South Carolina Ed
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,802

Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 310 Post(s)
Liked 215 Times in 106 Posts
Riding a heavier / less efficient bike has merits
sced is offline  
Old 05-03-21, 06:38 AM
  #45  
Symox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 653

Bikes: '07 Specialized Roubaix Comp Triple, '12 Gravity Fixie, '21 Liv Rove 4, '06? Giant EB Spirit

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 334 Post(s)
Liked 215 Times in 136 Posts
There are things called flywheels that rely on the effect of rotating weight - yes it matters

does it matter in your specific case? Probably
Symox is offline  
Old 05-03-21, 07:17 AM
  #46  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,330

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20611 Post(s)
Liked 9,283 Times in 4,597 Posts
Originally Posted by sced View Post
Riding a heavier / less efficient bike has merits
No, not really.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 05-03-21, 08:14 AM
  #47  
aclinjury
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 660
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 497 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times in 128 Posts
Once again GCN does stupid science.
Motorcycle world knows all too well about rotating weight, yes it matters both during acceleration and constant motion.

Reminds when GCN does "keto diet" a few years back. What a bunch of hacks.
aclinjury is offline  
Old 05-03-21, 08:29 AM
  #48  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,415
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 951 Post(s)
Liked 392 Times in 235 Posts
Originally Posted by aclinjury View Post
Once again GCN does stupid science.
Motorcycle world knows all too well about rotating weight, yes it matters both during acceleration and constant motion.
To say it matters is a value judgement. Everyone will have their own value system. There is no blanket answer as to what matters. As to making a difference, any change by definition makes a difference cf. my post above.

p.s. bicycles are not motorcycles.
asgelle is offline  
Likes For asgelle:
Old 05-03-21, 10:35 AM
  #49  
Badger6
Obsessed with Eddington
 
Badger6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,329

Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 531 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times in 368 Posts
Originally Posted by sced View Post
Riding a heavier / less efficient bike has merits
Not for me.
Badger6 is offline  
Old 05-03-21, 10:44 AM
  #50  
terrymorse 
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 5,457

Bikes: Scott Addict R1

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1935 Post(s)
Liked 1,871 Times in 981 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest View Post
When it's coming to an end none of us will care what kind of average speeds we did, most of us will care how much joy and misery we experienced when we look back.
Some of us will care.


__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat

terrymorse is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.