Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Thomas DeGent no fan of hookless…

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Thomas DeGent no fan of hookless…

Old 02-24-24, 05:48 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
waters60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 563
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked 108 Times in 63 Posts
Thomas DeGent no fan of hookless…

Seems like a pretty damning indictment of this technology…
Grabbing my popcorn!
waters60 is offline  
Old 02-24-24, 06:12 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,935

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 7,279 Times in 2,940 Posts
I heard Primoz Roglic is no fan of popcorn. Seems like a pretty damning indictment of this snack food.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 02-24-24, 06:24 PM
  #3  
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,945

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6173 Post(s)
Liked 4,790 Times in 3,305 Posts
Froome didn't like disc brakes. Everyone has a opinion. Just like us here at BF, I'm not sure why we should expect all the pro's to agree.
Iride01 is offline  
Likes For Iride01:
Old 02-24-24, 08:33 PM
  #4  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,526

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3884 Post(s)
Liked 1,936 Times in 1,382 Posts
Fault of the mechanic or team leadership?
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 02-24-24, 10:29 PM
  #5  
Resident PIA
 
Shadco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: City of Oaks, NC
Posts: 847

Bikes: Gunnar Roadie, Look 765 Optimum, Spesh Aethos

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 355 Times in 185 Posts
He went down hard, not Adam Yates hard but still pretty damn hard.

.
__________________
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
Shadco is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 12:04 AM
  #6  
Pedalin' Erry Day
 
lasauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 1,144
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 755 Post(s)
Liked 365 Times in 196 Posts
One incident that hasn't been fully investigated yet is a damning indictment of an entire technology that has been in use by the peloton and available in the marketplace for several years now?
lasauge is offline  
Likes For lasauge:
Old 02-25-24, 12:20 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,492

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 335 Times in 223 Posts
He's not wrong. There's no benefit for the rider in hookless but there are plenty of disadvantages, like the greatly reduced ability of the rim to hold the tire in place.

Hookless rims are a lot cheaper to produce so there's that.
elcruxio is offline  
Likes For elcruxio:
Old 02-25-24, 01:54 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
Decent balanced analysis https://escapecollective.com/thomas-...arning-to-all/
choddo is offline  
Likes For choddo:
Old 02-25-24, 06:31 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
waters60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 563
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked 108 Times in 63 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
Talk about a can of worms! If a pro team mechanic cannot figure out the mismatch and potential problems such as experienced by DeGent, are mere mortals supposed to absorb all of this information and get the correct combination that will prevent an unprovoked crash such as he experienced. At least I know I won’t have this trouble with my securely mounted Veloflex tubulars!
waters60 is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 07:25 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,373
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4384 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times in 2,981 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
For these reasons I prefer to stick with hooked rims. I don’t see any compelling advantage with hookless rims to make them worth the risk, however small it may be.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 02-25-24, 07:30 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,492

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 335 Times in 223 Posts
Also as it would seem, the ISO standard of tire and rim combinations prevents one getting within the 105% rule, which harms any aero claims hookless might have.

The article did mention the 105% isn't important, but I didn't see any meaningful info why that may be. Just a claim by some random person. Whereas I believe Zipp did quite a bit of research back in the day to arrive to the 105 number.
elcruxio is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 07:38 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,790
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 497 Post(s)
Liked 620 Times in 367 Posts
Face plants will do that.....
wheelreason is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 07:45 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,373
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4384 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times in 2,981 Posts
Originally Posted by elcruxio

The article did mention the 105% isn't important, but I didn't see any meaningful info why that may be. Just a claim by some random person. Whereas I believe Zipp did quite a bit of research back in the day to arrive to the 105 number.
In fairness, JP Ballard is not just some random guy. I don’t know what he actually claimed regarding the “105% rule”, but aero rules of thumb like this are rarely universal. I guess you would have to listen to the quoted podcast to understand more.
PeteHski is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 07:58 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,227

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1097 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
I've run early model Michelin tubeless 28mm tires that aren't hookless approved on 25mm IW hookless rims with no problems. The last one was taken out of service because the bead had stretched so much that it unseated when the air was let out to check the sealant level and would no longer stay seated long enough to reinstall the valve core. I now use Pirelli P-Zero TLR tubeless that are approved for hookless and 28mm tires are rated OK for 25mm IW rims. Regardless of what ETRTO says, follow the manufacturer's recommendations.

I've had the Pirelli tires mounted on a bike for a year and moved the front to the back for another year with no problems.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 08:38 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,227

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1097 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
Originally Posted by elcruxio
Also as it would seem, the ISO standard of tire and rim combinations prevents one getting within the 105% rule, which harms any aero claims hookless might have.

The article did mention the 105% isn't important, but I didn't see any meaningful info why that may be. Just a claim by some random person. Whereas I believe Zipp did quite a bit of research back in the day to arrive to the 105 number.
Zipp says that their 23mm IW 303s wheels are optimized for 28mm tires. Mine worked fine for two years, but I recently sold them to get rid of rim tape. Their 25mm IW rims also work with most 28mm and wider tires.

I now have 3 sets of BTLOS hookless wheels, all 25mm IW, with no rim tape needed. I'm running 28mm front and 30mm rear at the same 50-55 psi pressure.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 10:19 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
Zipp says that their 23mm IW 303s wheels are optimized for 28mm tires. Mine worked fine for two years, but I recently sold them to get rid of rim tape. Their 25mm IW rims also work with most 28mm and wider tires.

I now have 3 sets of BTLOS hookless wheels, all 25mm IW, with no rim tape needed. I'm running 28mm front and 30mm rear at the same 50-55 psi pressure.
Do you find any advantage from hookless? I assume they're supposed to be a bit easier to seat?
choddo is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 10:34 AM
  #17  
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,945

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6173 Post(s)
Liked 4,790 Times in 3,305 Posts
It seems the obvious solution is that we should all use the exact same technology and everything must be cross compatible with everything else. Then there'd be no question what so ever as to what is better. <sarcasm> <grin>
Iride01 is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 10:36 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,107

Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 579 Times in 437 Posts
Originally Posted by waters60
Seems like a pretty damning indictment of this technology…
Grabbing my popcorn!
Are we 100% certain that the incident was caused by the fact that the rim is hookless?

This is the first thing I want to know before even considering to argue on the whole hookless thing. I've owned 2 sets of hookless rims in the last 5 years and my experience was positive.
eduskator is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 10:45 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,457
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1740 Post(s)
Liked 1,369 Times in 718 Posts
I've been around cycling since 1971 and have very fond memories of hookless rims. What a treat they were to deal with when mated to the wrong tire. Then I discovered hooked rims around 1978 and was disappointed that just about any tire made in the appropriate diameter was able to be installed with ease and that they stayed put on the rim, even at high pressures!
WTF is wrong with the bike industry and better yet, what is wrong with the consumers who insist on following the pull on their ring noses?
TiHabanero is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 11:45 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
Originally Posted by eduskator
Are we 100% certain that the incident was caused by the fact that the rim is hookless?

This is the first thing I want to know before even considering to argue on the whole hookless thing. I've owned 2 sets of hookless rims in the last 5 years and my experience was positive.
No
choddo is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 12:46 PM
  #21  
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,641

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1939 Post(s)
Liked 1,461 Times in 1,012 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
For these reasons I prefer to stick with hooked rims. I don’t see any compelling advantage with hookless rims to make them worth the risk, however small it may be.
In additional to those reasons, I am chubby (90 kg) and cannot comply with hookless tire pressure maximum limits.
SoSmellyAir is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 02:47 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times in 1,510 Posts
I think someone else mentioned it, but could we have a rundown on the advantages of hookless for the rider?
seypat is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 03:21 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,358
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2477 Post(s)
Liked 2,947 Times in 1,673 Posts
Originally Posted by seypat
I think someone else mentioned it, but could we have a rundown on the advantages of hookless for the rider?
From the rider's point of view, you mean? In previous threads on the topic, the main one seemed to be the theoretical weight savings. A figure of 50 grams per wheel tended to be mentioned. That's about it for tangible advantages, maybe.

From the company's point of view, the overwhelming advantage is much reduced fabrication cost, owing to the difficulty of devising molds to produce carbon rims with hooks. It's telling that modern hookless rims didn't exist until carbon rims began dominating the upper end of the bike market.

Edit: just did a quick search - a page on the Hunt Wheels website includes the following:

"From our development of hookless rims, we saw clear weight savings (about 10-15g lighter per rim) for the same profile and dimensions, when compared to hooked. There's also a cost reduction owing to a simpler manufacturing process, which we passed on to the rider."

Last edited by Trakhak; 02-25-24 at 03:27 PM.
Trakhak is online now  
Old 02-25-24, 03:48 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times in 1,510 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
From the rider's point of view, you mean? In previous threads on the topic, the main one seemed to be the theoretical weight savings. A figure of 50 grams per wheel tended to be mentioned. That's about it for tangible advantages, maybe.

From the company's point of view, the overwhelming advantage is much reduced fabrication cost, owing to the difficulty of devising molds to produce carbon rims with hooks. It's telling that modern hookless rims didn't exist until carbon rims began dominating the upper end of the bike market.

Edit: just did a quick search - a page on the Hunt Wheels website includes the following:

"From our development of hookless rims, we saw clear weight savings (about 10-15g lighter per rim) for the same profile and dimensions, when compared to hooked. There's also a cost reduction owing to a simpler manufacturing process, which we passed on to the rider."
Thanks.

I remember now the PZMET? person talking about them in detail some time ago. So, there's a thread on here with a lot of info.

Last edited by seypat; 02-25-24 at 06:09 PM.
seypat is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 03:48 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,373
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4384 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times in 2,981 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak

"From our development of hookless rims, we saw clear weight savings (about 10-15g lighter per rim) for the same profile and dimensions, when compared to hooked. There's also a cost reduction owing to a simpler manufacturing process, which we passed on to the rider."
Really not worth anything then at this point then. I can see why the manufacturers are keen, but I don't see any win for the rider. Be interesting to see if they keep pushing this direction or not. Not all manufacturers seem convinced.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.