Clipless really worth it?
#26
Arizona Dessert

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 2,170
From: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Originally Posted by Phantoj
The downside of clipless is that you always have to wear the fancy shoes when you want to ride. So you can't just hop on and ride a mile or two to the library or whereever. Or Starbucks, ha ha. But road bikes aren't ideal for that kind of utility riding, and you can buy inserts for your clipless pedals if that's important.
Al
#27
Yes, it makes a world of difference.
As all the other posters have said:
- much more efficient pedal stroke;
- safer on the road (when you crash the bike tends to separate from the rider).
Just do it!
As all the other posters have said:
- much more efficient pedal stroke;
- safer on the road (when you crash the bike tends to separate from the rider).
Just do it!
#28
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Also using a system (like SPD) with a recessed cleat give one a lot of flexibility to get regular looking shoes (or sandals) with clipless that are easy to walk in.
Al
Al
#29
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Just an anecdote, take it for what its worth: when I was in college (dating myself here) a buddy of mine upgraded his "big red" Trek 970 mtn bike with clipless pedals. Several months later, he got himself a Rock Shox Mag 21. Because I was looking to upgrade my bike, but only had money to afford either clipless pedals/shoes OR front suspension, I asked him which he thought was a better upgrade. No hesitation, he said the clipless pedals.
BTW, aren't most of those track riders clipped AND strapped in? That is what I understand is common, though I honestly can't tell from those photos. I may be wrong on that.
Also, as someone may have noted above, the trackies' straps are much tighter than you would ordinarily run, if you ever want to tae your foot out at a stoplight, etc. I actually find clipless easier to get out of than anything other than the very loosest clip/strap setup.
BTW, aren't most of those track riders clipped AND strapped in? That is what I understand is common, though I honestly can't tell from those photos. I may be wrong on that.
Also, as someone may have noted above, the trackies' straps are much tighter than you would ordinarily run, if you ever want to tae your foot out at a stoplight, etc. I actually find clipless easier to get out of than anything other than the very loosest clip/strap setup.
#31
Buddha Khan
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
There was quite a noticeable difference in going from platforms to clips/straps; but there was a very small difference in going from clips/straps to clipless. If you're more of a masher, there's probably no difference. If you're more of a spinner, then that might make some difference.
#32
Avatar out of order.

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
From: North of the border, just
Bikes: Fuji Absolut '04 / Fuji 'Marlboro' Folder
I've taken the first step -- gotten some ATB shoes that are SPD compatible. Just the extra stiffness seems to have given my clipped arrangement a 1-2 MPH increase. But now I'm a little worried. Had a bike mechanic tell me this weekend that she once was ticketed for riding at night without reflectorized pedals. Well, clipless are usually un-reflectorized, and the reflectors they put on the "legal" clipless pedals tend to come off.
Anyone else have run-ins with the law over clip-less pedals?
Anyone else have run-ins with the law over clip-less pedals?
#33
Cat None
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Bikes: LOOK KG 461, LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er 0
Originally Posted by meme
There was quite a noticeable difference in going from platforms to clips/straps; but there was a very small difference in going from clips/straps to clipless. If you're more of a masher, there's probably no difference. If you're more of a spinner, then that might make some difference.
#34
Cat None
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Bikes: LOOK KG 461, LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er 0
Originally Posted by MarkS
I've taken the first step -- gotten some ATB shoes that are SPD compatible. Just the extra stiffness seems to have given my clipped arrangement a 1-2 MPH increase. But now I'm a little worried. Had a bike mechanic tell me this weekend that she once was ticketed for riding at night without reflectorized pedals. Well, clipless are usually un-reflectorized, and the reflectors they put on the "legal" clipless pedals tend to come off.
Anyone else have run-ins with the law over clip-less pedals?
Anyone else have run-ins with the law over clip-less pedals?
#35
Warning:Mild Peril
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 3
From: Seattle Refugee in Los Angeles
Bikes: Cilo, Surly Pacer, Kona Fire Mountain w/Bob Trailer, Scattante
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Kind of... I use SPD 'mountain' pedals (MO520) and even though they really don't have a platform, I find it no problem at all riding a mile or so to the coffee shop in regular shoes or even flip flops. Also using a system (like SPD) with a recessed cleat give one a lot of flexibility to get regular looking shoes (or sandals) with clipless that are easy to walk in.
Al
Al
I know folks will say that there is a huge difference in stiffness and other BS, but I really doubt that mtn bike racers would settle for second rate flexy pedals and shoes. Plus as I gaze at my fall pasta belly I don't think it's my shoes that are holding me back.
The other benefits of double sided mtn pedals for a clydesdale are if one side breaks you have the other side to get you home.
Me, I'll never go back to walking like a duck.
__________________
Non semper erit aestas.
Non semper erit aestas.
#36
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SDRider
Most (if not all) road shoes have reflective material on the heel and side. This should satisfy that requirement.
#37
Living the n+1

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,746
Likes: 2
From: Off the back
Bikes: 2019 RM Pipeline, 2019 RM Blizzard, 2013 SuperX, 2007 Litespeed Vortex, 1970 Falcon Olympic, 2008 RM Metropolis IGH, 2004 Specialized Enduro, 2006 Langster
Get them. We haven't had any "Clipless Newb tips over at lights" threads lately. 
Unless your clips are strapped really tight to your shoes, (to the point where you can't pull out) there will be more inefficiencies than using clipless. IMO
T.J.

Unless your clips are strapped really tight to your shoes, (to the point where you can't pull out) there will be more inefficiencies than using clipless. IMO
T.J.
#38
"Great One"
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 0
From: Might as well be underwater because I make less drag than a torpedoE (no aero bars here though)
Originally Posted by Phantoj
The downside of clipless is that you always have to wear the fancy shoes when you want to ride. So you can't just hop on and ride a mile or two to the library or whereever. Or Starbucks, ha ha. But road bikes aren't ideal for that kind of utility riding, and you can buy inserts for your clipless pedals if that's important.
Look at the clearance stuff in Nashbar, and you can get a pair of shoes and some basic pedals for a lot less than $150.
However, IMO, better shoes (Sidis) are worth it if you ride a lot.
Look at the clearance stuff in Nashbar, and you can get a pair of shoes and some basic pedals for a lot less than $150.
However, IMO, better shoes (Sidis) are worth it if you ride a lot.
They are super fast to clip into also. In fact, I've clipped in accidently more than once when I was planning on coming to a stop.
#39
Arizona Dessert

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 2,170
From: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Originally Posted by 53-11_alltheway
I've clipped in accidently more than once when I was planning on coming to a stop.
Al
#40
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
I was in the same boat. Just bought a new bike and am not used to clipless. I asked the LBS to put on a pedal and straps until I got used to riding again (I will try clipless on a roller this winter.) When I go all clipless, I will return the pedal and straps back to them if they want. I clipless shoes are coming on Friday so I will get a chance to try them out soon hopefully. So far I've been riding two days with straps and haven't fallen yet- although I did come close once when I decided to stop on a slight uphill.
#41
Thread Starter
Flying Pig
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Bikes: 06 Specialized Allez Sport, '10 Trek Fuel EX 7
Wow, I could imagine a crowd just screaming "Just DO it"
I AM a college student and in a tight@$$ budget after all, so wanted to be 100% sure going clipless is worth my allowance - and I'm now pretty much convinced
I will now pedal to mach speed to my LBS. Thanks for the feedback.
I AM a college student and in a tight@$$ budget after all, so wanted to be 100% sure going clipless is worth my allowance - and I'm now pretty much convinced
I will now pedal to mach speed to my LBS. Thanks for the feedback.
#42
My toilet-Floyd's future
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
Yeah, why is it they make road shoes impossible to walk in with that cleat sticking out of the bottom of the shoe so far?
#43
Cat None
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Bikes: LOOK KG 461, LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er 0
Originally Posted by Cycling Giraffe
For whatever its worth, Sidi Genius, which is probably the most popular road shoe there is, do not. Or at least mine don't appear to have any. I don't think my old Diadoras did either, but I'll have to check on that. You can correct me if I'm wrong.
#44
Cat None
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Bikes: LOOK KG 461, LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er 0
Originally Posted by Tequila Joe
Get them. We haven't had any "Clipless Newb tips over at lights" threads lately. 
Unless your clips are strapped really tight to your shoes, (to the point where you can't pull out) there will be more inefficiencies than using clipless. IMO
T.J.

Unless your clips are strapped really tight to your shoes, (to the point where you can't pull out) there will be more inefficiencies than using clipless. IMO
T.J.
#45
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
It may be theoretically possible for a rider using clips and straps to be just as efficient on the upstroke as one using clipless, but I bet you that efficiency will degrade over time.
I have owned decent shoes, clips, and straps. No matter what the setup, all of the straps become loose during the course of the ride. My foot begins to wobble around inside the pedal. This has got to decrease efficiency.
Clipless pedals don't have this problem. You are always connected and don't ever feel a loss.
Note that all of the track sprinters in the pictures above use DOUBLE straps. This is, presumably, becuase single straps loosen over time. Also, are these double-strap setups commercially available? How easy are they to get into and out of? They look pretty difficult to me, and the extra effort would presumably negate any safety advantage of clips and straps for us non-track riders.
I have owned decent shoes, clips, and straps. No matter what the setup, all of the straps become loose during the course of the ride. My foot begins to wobble around inside the pedal. This has got to decrease efficiency.
Clipless pedals don't have this problem. You are always connected and don't ever feel a loss.
Note that all of the track sprinters in the pictures above use DOUBLE straps. This is, presumably, becuase single straps loosen over time. Also, are these double-strap setups commercially available? How easy are they to get into and out of? They look pretty difficult to me, and the extra effort would presumably negate any safety advantage of clips and straps for us non-track riders.
#46
'07 Dean El Diente
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
My Trek 2100 came with SPD clipless pedals. I had them switch to toe clips to make it easy for me to get back into cycling. I didn't want to hassle with learning clipless while learning new bike routes. I also didn't want to spend money on shoes right away until I knew what I wanted.
I had trouble using the toe clips with certain shoes. I would keep the toe clips loose, I never adjusted them. When I cycled in my two pairs of walking shoes, it felt like I was pedaling with my toes. The only shoes that felt good was a pair of canvas topsiders, so I could pedal with the ball of my foot.
After two months and 300 miles, I decided to switch to the clipless pedals since I would hardly ever have to get out of the toe clips. I purchased the Shimano touring shoes that let you walk easily with the SPD clips. I adjusted the pedals on the loose setting and have been using them ever since.
I had trouble using the toe clips with certain shoes. I would keep the toe clips loose, I never adjusted them. When I cycled in my two pairs of walking shoes, it felt like I was pedaling with my toes. The only shoes that felt good was a pair of canvas topsiders, so I could pedal with the ball of my foot.
After two months and 300 miles, I decided to switch to the clipless pedals since I would hardly ever have to get out of the toe clips. I purchased the Shimano touring shoes that let you walk easily with the SPD clips. I adjusted the pedals on the loose setting and have been using them ever since.
#47
Wer wagt, gewinnt.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: NJ
lol...the majority of the responses run like a commercial for clip-in pedals!
Rolliepollie, I can tell one mans opinion, which won't be popular with the masses. I bought my road bike in 2004, with toe straps. I rode all of 2004 and early 05 with the straps. I made the switch partly due to all the hoopla touted by so many riders in my club. I installed the clip-ins and rode them from late June until October, about 873 miles. I didn't like them from day one. I wanted to take them off immediately but I gave them a chance to see if I would adjust to wearing them, but I didn't.
I made sure my measurements were correct, I aligned my cleats with my foot position on the pedal etc...I followed advice from experienced riders, and carmichael's book to no avail. It didn't matter what adjustment I made or position the shoes/clips were in - they were uncomfortable. I also did not notice any significant difference in efficiency and/or power. I coudn't climb any faster or longer etc. I was not faster in any way, nor did I gain any more noticable efficiency.
I did not feel any more 'connected' to my bike at all. In fact, I felt just the opposite.
With the clip-ins it seems that only a small portion of the shoe is in contact with the pedal, whereas with the toe straps there is more of your foot on the pedal, it feels more secure and stable. It may be a perception but I like being in the toe straps and cinched down tight. But I believe that most who boast of this new found improvement is really just a case of perception as well.
I have to laugh when you get new riders geting exclamatory on how you will improve 20%! Geez...it really is funny how a lot of new riders are brainwashed by marketing and shop owners/sales people. Perhaps if your in the pro peleton and are one of the best cyclists on the planet, then and only then could you maybe see a 20% increase. I would say that most if not all new riders have bikes that are better than them. So pedals are not going to make a huge difference. Work on endurance, strength, power, and smoothness first. Which isn't going to happen overnight, in fact it won't happen for a few years or more. Spend money on things that matter, such as a good helmet, safety, clothing gear, and a trainer.
Now, it seems that most of riders who favor clip-ins like the way they feel, so then that is the choice for each of them. I also have no doub t that if riders who like them are going to fully believe that they are better off using the clip-ins.
If they feel good, they ride better, they are happier. Which is the real point anyway.
Bottom line is, there is not the marked claimed 20% improvement for the typical average rider with average capability. I believe it is more hype than reality, because every individual is different, with varying needs. You should ride both before making a decision, if that is possible. Go with what feels best, and makes riding fun.
Rolliepollie, I can tell one mans opinion, which won't be popular with the masses. I bought my road bike in 2004, with toe straps. I rode all of 2004 and early 05 with the straps. I made the switch partly due to all the hoopla touted by so many riders in my club. I installed the clip-ins and rode them from late June until October, about 873 miles. I didn't like them from day one. I wanted to take them off immediately but I gave them a chance to see if I would adjust to wearing them, but I didn't.
I made sure my measurements were correct, I aligned my cleats with my foot position on the pedal etc...I followed advice from experienced riders, and carmichael's book to no avail. It didn't matter what adjustment I made or position the shoes/clips were in - they were uncomfortable. I also did not notice any significant difference in efficiency and/or power. I coudn't climb any faster or longer etc. I was not faster in any way, nor did I gain any more noticable efficiency.
I did not feel any more 'connected' to my bike at all. In fact, I felt just the opposite.
With the clip-ins it seems that only a small portion of the shoe is in contact with the pedal, whereas with the toe straps there is more of your foot on the pedal, it feels more secure and stable. It may be a perception but I like being in the toe straps and cinched down tight. But I believe that most who boast of this new found improvement is really just a case of perception as well.
I have to laugh when you get new riders geting exclamatory on how you will improve 20%! Geez...it really is funny how a lot of new riders are brainwashed by marketing and shop owners/sales people. Perhaps if your in the pro peleton and are one of the best cyclists on the planet, then and only then could you maybe see a 20% increase. I would say that most if not all new riders have bikes that are better than them. So pedals are not going to make a huge difference. Work on endurance, strength, power, and smoothness first. Which isn't going to happen overnight, in fact it won't happen for a few years or more. Spend money on things that matter, such as a good helmet, safety, clothing gear, and a trainer.
Now, it seems that most of riders who favor clip-ins like the way they feel, so then that is the choice for each of them. I also have no doub t that if riders who like them are going to fully believe that they are better off using the clip-ins.
If they feel good, they ride better, they are happier. Which is the real point anyway.
Bottom line is, there is not the marked claimed 20% improvement for the typical average rider with average capability. I believe it is more hype than reality, because every individual is different, with varying needs. You should ride both before making a decision, if that is possible. Go with what feels best, and makes riding fun.
#48
Cat None
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Bikes: LOOK KG 461, LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er 0
Originally Posted by dc70
lol...the majority of the responses run like a commercial for clip-in pedals!
Rolliepollie, I can tell one mans opinion, which won't be popular with the masses. I bought my road bike in 2004, with toe straps. I rode all of 2004 and early 05 with the straps. I made the switch partly due to all the hoopla touted by so many riders in my club. I installed the clip-ins and rode them from late June until October, about 873 miles. I didn't like them from day one. I wanted to take them off immediately but I gave them a chance to see if I would adjust to wearing them, but I didn't.
I made sure my measurements were correct, I aligned my cleats with my foot position on the pedal etc...I followed advice from experienced riders, and carmichael's book to no avail. It didn't matter what adjustment I made or position the shoes/clips were in - they were uncomfortable. I also did not notice any significant difference in efficiency and/or power. I coudn't climb any faster or longer etc. I was not faster in any way, nor did I gain any more noticable efficiency.
I did not feel any more 'connected' to my bike at all. In fact, I felt just the opposite.
With the clip-ins it seems that only a small portion of the shoe is in contact with the pedal, whereas with the toe straps there is more of your foot on the pedal, it feels more secure and stable. It may be a perception but I like being in the toe straps and cinched down tight. But I believe that most who boast of this new found improvement is really just a case of perception as well.
I have to laugh when you get new riders geting exclamatory on how you will improve 20%! Geez...it really is funny how a lot of new riders are brainwashed by marketing and shop owners/sales people. Perhaps if your in the pro peleton and are one of the best cyclists on the planet, then and only then could you maybe see a 20% increase. I would say that most if not all new riders have bikes that are better than them. So pedals are not going to make a huge difference. Work on endurance, strength, power, and smoothness first. Which isn't going to happen overnight, in fact it won't happen for a few years or more. Spend money on things that matter, such as a good helmet, safety, clothing gear, and a trainer.
Now, it seems that most of riders who favor clip-ins like the way they feel, so then that is the choice for each of them. I also have no doub t that if riders who like them are going to fully believe that they are better off using the clip-ins.
If they feel good, they ride better, they are happier. Which is the real point anyway.
Bottom line is, there is not the marked claimed 20% improvement for the typical average rider with average capability. I believe it is more hype than reality, because every individual is different, with varying needs. You should ride both before making a decision, if that is possible. Go with what feels best, and makes riding fun.
Rolliepollie, I can tell one mans opinion, which won't be popular with the masses. I bought my road bike in 2004, with toe straps. I rode all of 2004 and early 05 with the straps. I made the switch partly due to all the hoopla touted by so many riders in my club. I installed the clip-ins and rode them from late June until October, about 873 miles. I didn't like them from day one. I wanted to take them off immediately but I gave them a chance to see if I would adjust to wearing them, but I didn't.
I made sure my measurements were correct, I aligned my cleats with my foot position on the pedal etc...I followed advice from experienced riders, and carmichael's book to no avail. It didn't matter what adjustment I made or position the shoes/clips were in - they were uncomfortable. I also did not notice any significant difference in efficiency and/or power. I coudn't climb any faster or longer etc. I was not faster in any way, nor did I gain any more noticable efficiency.
I did not feel any more 'connected' to my bike at all. In fact, I felt just the opposite.
With the clip-ins it seems that only a small portion of the shoe is in contact with the pedal, whereas with the toe straps there is more of your foot on the pedal, it feels more secure and stable. It may be a perception but I like being in the toe straps and cinched down tight. But I believe that most who boast of this new found improvement is really just a case of perception as well.
I have to laugh when you get new riders geting exclamatory on how you will improve 20%! Geez...it really is funny how a lot of new riders are brainwashed by marketing and shop owners/sales people. Perhaps if your in the pro peleton and are one of the best cyclists on the planet, then and only then could you maybe see a 20% increase. I would say that most if not all new riders have bikes that are better than them. So pedals are not going to make a huge difference. Work on endurance, strength, power, and smoothness first. Which isn't going to happen overnight, in fact it won't happen for a few years or more. Spend money on things that matter, such as a good helmet, safety, clothing gear, and a trainer.
Now, it seems that most of riders who favor clip-ins like the way they feel, so then that is the choice for each of them. I also have no doub t that if riders who like them are going to fully believe that they are better off using the clip-ins.
If they feel good, they ride better, they are happier. Which is the real point anyway.
Bottom line is, there is not the marked claimed 20% improvement for the typical average rider with average capability. I believe it is more hype than reality, because every individual is different, with varying needs. You should ride both before making a decision, if that is possible. Go with what feels best, and makes riding fun.
Anyway, I finally decided to give clipless a try on my road bike while commuting. I was aprehensive at first and my riding buddies all told me that it was only a matter of time until I fell over but as I rode them I got more comfortable with them and now I can't imagine going back to toe clips. Man, that would be a real step back...might as well suggest that downtube shifters are the wave of the future...or 5 speed freewheels...or centerpull brakes.
#49
Aluminium Crusader :-)

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,050
Likes: 11
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Joe Schmoe
It may be theoretically possible for a rider using clips and straps to be just as efficient on the upstroke as one using clipless, but I bet you that efficiency will degrade over time.
I have owned decent shoes, clips, and straps. No matter what the setup, all of the straps become loose during the course of the ride. My foot begins to wobble around inside the pedal. This has got to decrease efficiency.Clipless pedals don't have this problem. You are always connected and don't ever feel a loss.Note that all of the track sprinters in the pictures above use DOUBLE straps. This is, presumably, becuase single straps loosen over time. Also, are these double-strap setups commercially available? How easy are they to get into and out of? They look pretty difficult to me, and the extra effort would presumably negate any safety advantage of clips and straps for us non-track riders.
I have owned decent shoes, clips, and straps. No matter what the setup, all of the straps become loose during the course of the ride. My foot begins to wobble around inside the pedal. This has got to decrease efficiency.Clipless pedals don't have this problem. You are always connected and don't ever feel a loss.Note that all of the track sprinters in the pictures above use DOUBLE straps. This is, presumably, becuase single straps loosen over time. Also, are these double-strap setups commercially available? How easy are they to get into and out of? They look pretty difficult to me, and the extra effort would presumably negate any safety advantage of clips and straps for us non-track riders.
Velco straps are just as likely to work loose over time, and leather straps are just as easy to re-tighten.
Track riders use double straps coz of their freaky power, and they can't risk pulling a foot in such short events.
Hinault, et al, and the bazillion other superstars before him had no problem with 'efficiciency' using single toe-straps -- in fact, perhaps LeMond decided to increase his efficiency be adding a strap to his TIme pedals in '89.



Perhaps the toe-straps helped LeMond snag the '89 World's

Last edited by 531Aussie; 11-02-05 at 09:51 PM.
#50
Aluminium Crusader :-)

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,050
Likes: 11
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by dc70
lol...the majority of the responses run like a commercial for clip-in pedals!
.
.
All this 'increase you power' BS.
A bunch of youngins regurgitating what the guy at the bike shop told them. Ask Curt Harnett if he thinks clipless pedals would've made him beat his 200m time of 9"865
The number 1 reason by a gazillion miles why clipless became so popular is the comfort factor
Last edited by 531Aussie; 11-02-05 at 09:55 PM.




